OLAADEGBU:
What does the Bible mean when it says, "The fool says in his heart, 'There is no God'"? Is atheism foolish? Are all atheists fools?

generalbush:
Even the ones that can't afford a 3 square meal

hopefulLandlord:


I'm curious

what led to this?

QueenSuccubus:




What verse in the Bible?

hopefulLandlord:


I'm curious

what led to this?

generalbush:
[s][/s]

hopefulLandlord:


I thought as much

Mummyjoy:
I think atheists are worst than fools, if the Bible qualified a thought as foolishness, how much more an open declaration that there's no God

OLAADEGBU:
What does the Bible mean when it says,
"The fool says in his heart, 'There is no God'"?

OLAADEGBU:
Is atheism foolish?

OLAADEGBU:
Are all atheists fools?

frank317:
At least athesits don't eat grass or drink rat poison, or dedicate 80% of their time worshipping an imaginary being or give allow themselves to get scammed by God of men or or accept they are not worthy, or worship a dead Jew or..
If not doing all these will make me a fool, then i am gladly a fool.

OLAADEGBU:
What does the Bible mean when it says, "The fool says in his heart, 'There is no God'"? Is atheism foolish? Are all atheists fools?

hopefulLandlord:
Toooo Much Fallacies in that empty rhetoric Christians spill from that verse in that book of theirs


"The fool has said in his heart, 'There is no God.' They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that does good." (Psalms 14:1)

Fallacies committed:

ad hominem fallacy : An argument is discounted based on attacking the character of the person making the argument. ("He is wrong when he says there is no God, because he is a fool." )

strawman fallacy : Arguing against a position by creating a different, weaker, or irrelevant position and refuting that position instead of the original. ("There is no God" misrepresents "There isn't sufficient evidence that God exists." )

circular reasoning : The truth of the conclusion is assumed in order to justify the premises. ("The fool says there is no God, because anyone who says there is no God is a fool." )

begging the question : The argument creates a secondary proposition that is related to the primary proposition, which requires a similar argument that is missing. (The existence of God is assumed, while addressing propositions of whether God exists.)

fallacy of inconsistency : The argument is inconsistent with other arguments within the same context.
In the Christian context, Jesus commands against the invective in Psalms 14:1, warning that
"whoever says 'You fool!' shall be liable to the hell of fire" in Matthew 5:22.

special pleading : The inappropriate attribution of emotive functions to objects that do not have that capability. (Hearts are not capable of "knowing" or of feeling emotions.)

redundancy : Psalm 53 is identical to Psalm 14.

questionable premise : It is obviously not the case that all atheists do nothing but bad deeds. This premise is invalidated by a single example of an atheist doing a single charitable act.

those are the different fallacies committed by just one verse

lmao!

lazsnaira:
ATHEISTS are not fools and they are NOT really doubting the existence of GOD! ...they are just curious cats who want to SEE GOD FACE TO FACE.

Strawman:


Whenever you copy a post from somewhere else, always make reference to the source to avoid being guilty of plagiarism. http://freelink.wildlink.com/fallacy.php

Strawman:
Whenever you copy a post from somewhere else, always make reference to the source to avoid being guilty of plagiarism. h t tp ://freelink.wildlink.com/fallacy.php

MuttleyLaff:

This isnt covering all cases or instances
because all atheists are fools,
only in the context of concluding and deciding in the heart that there's no ''power authority and influence'' (i.e. God)

hopefulLandlord:


Kingebukasblog wannabe


talk about the message

Strawman:


So anyone who cordially advises someone to stop plagiarising is a "Kingebukasblog wannabe"? That just makes him a good example to follow

You've posted that stuff at least 3 times since last year, each time masquerading it as a new post just to garner 'likes'. Don't be butthurt I caught you, just take correction and make reference next time.

analice107:
But is there any atheist who hasn't concluded and decided in his/her heart that there's no "power authority and influence" (i.e. God)?

hopefulLandlord:
Toooo Much Fallacies in that empty rhetoric Christians spill from that verse in that book of theirs

"The fool has said in his heart, 'There is no God.' They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that does good."
(Psalms 14:1)

Fallacies committed:

ad hominem fallacy:
An argument is discounted based on attacking the character of the person making the argument.
("He is wrong when he says there is no God, because he is a fool." )

hopefulLandlord:
strawman fallacy:
Arguing against a position by creating a different, weaker, or irrelevant position and refuting that position instead of the original. ("There is no God" misrepresents "There isn't sufficient evidence that God exists." )

hopefulLandlord:
circular reasoning:
The truth of the conclusion is assumed in order to justify the premises.
("The fool says there is no God, because anyone who says there is no God is a fool." )

hopefulLandlord:
begging the question:
The argument creates a secondary proposition that is related to the primary proposition, which requires a similar argument that is missing.
(The existence of God is assumed, while addressing propositions of whether God exists.)

hopefulLandlord:
fallacy of inconsistency:
The argument is inconsistent with other arguments within the same context.
In the Christian context, Jesus commands against the invective in Psalms 14:1, warning that
"whoever says 'You fool!' shall be liable to the hell of fire" in Matthew 5:22

hopefulLandlord:
special pleading:
The inappropriate attribution of emotive functions to objects that do not have that capability.
(Hearts are not capable of "knowing" or of feeling emotions.)

hopefulLandlord:
redundancy:
Psalm 53 is identical to Psalm 14.

hopefulLandlord:
questionable premise:
It is obviously not the case that all atheists do nothing but bad deeds.
This premise is invalidated by a single example of an atheist doing a single charitable act

hopefulLandlord:
those are the different fallacies committed by just one verse

hopefulLandlord:
lmao!

hopefulLandlord:
Edit:

hopefulLandlord:
Kingebukasblog googles every post I make, maybe you'll also go that route
oh! you caught me
I masqueraded it as a new post?
Hahahahahahahahaha abeg swerve
you got anything to say about the message?

hopefulLandlord:
what's funny is that no one has anything to say about the message

MuttleyLaff:
It is not covering all cases or instances of atheists' lives
because atheists are smart, intelligent, clever, witty and wise in a range of other things
They are wise in their own right BUT,
note ''but'' is in capitals for purpose of emphasis,
again, BUT, the atheists' Achilles heel, fault and shortcoming is the failure to accept
and/or to admit the existence of the true and one only ''power authority & influence'' (i.e. God)

The ''fool'' criterion has nothing to do with eating grass, drinking rat poison, getting scammed etcetera but centres on
not meeting an expected standard of accepting & admitting the existence of the true and one only ''power authority & influence'' (i.e. God)

On this premise and criterion alone (i.e. not covering all cases or instances of atheists' lives), is when atheists are deemed fools,
out of lack of wisdom, to make a right, correct & good decision
on acknowledging the existence of the true and one only ''power authority & influence'' (i.e. God)