EricBloodAxe:


For every action there's a reaction... there's no proof that the target was a rebel store house used to store sarin. If it were so then the syrians should have gone to the UN with proof.

Besides nerve agents are not chemicals u just put together using a bunsen burner and tubes, u need a laboratory with standard materials and procedures.

Mind u most of these materials used in the preparation of chemical agents are banned. So tell me how possible it is for rebel units to process such WMDs.

The syrians should recognise that Obama is nomore in power, Trump is not someone with a calculative mindset, he works instinctively.

Al Assad should better not keep his hopes any longer on the battle weary russians or the manipulative Iranians...once beaten, twice shy.

Well, the proof is very clear. The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons has stated in 2013 that all of Syria's chemical weapons were received and destroyed.

So why should a country that has accepted destruction of it's chemical arsenal later decide to create new chemical weapons if it could've easily rejected the Russian-brokered proposal to destroy said chemical weapons arsenal?

There's no proof Assad used chemical weapons.

ollah2:



Well, the proof is very clear. The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons has stated in 2013 that all of Syria's chemical weapons were received and destroyed.

So why should a country that has accepted destruction of it's chemical arsenal later decide to create new chemical weapons if it could've easily rejected the Russian-brokered proposal to destroy said chemical weapons arsenal?

There's no proof Assad used chemical weapons.

The OPCW last inspected the syrian arsenal in 2013. Inspections of such nature in a war torn country should be annually. The syrians have rejected calls for new chemical weapons inspection ever since d russians and iranians set foot on their soil.

EricBloodAxe:


The OPCW last inspected the syrian arsenal in 2013. Inspections of such nature in a war torn country should be annually. The syrians have rejected calls for new chemical weapons inspection ever since d russians and iranians set foot on their soil.

Why would Assad use a chemical weapon on a war he is already winning. Bro, all these is just for USA to have a direct impact in Syria. They are there illegally.

ollah2:


Why would Assad use a chemical weapon on a war he is already winning. Bro, all these is just for USA to have a direct impact in Syria. They are there illegally.

U can't be so sure assad is winning d war...we have close to 7 factions in syria fighting d war...and all are enemies to d syrian govt.

We have the free syrian rebels, daesh (isis), the kurds fighting isis still in syria, al qaeda, al nusra and recently the united states sent atleast 900 special forces plus some pockets of british special forces into syria.

So this war is far from over, and from d look of things there can be no winners.

Ps: one more post from you and u got d mark of the beast on ur profile...gudluck

EricBloodAxe:


U can't be so sure assad is winning d war...we have close to 7 factions in syria fighting d war...and all are enemies to d syrian govt.

We have the free syrian rebels, daesh (isis), the kurds fighting isis still in syria, al qaeda, al nusra and recently the united states sent atleast 900 special forces plus some pockets of british special forces into syria.

So this war is far from over, and from d look of things there can be no winners.

Ps: one more post from you and u got d mark of the beast on ur profile...gudluck

All The groups you listed are just to confuse the average Joe who happens to be the masses. USA can't provide any evidence Assad used chemical weapons matter of fact, they are afraid of real investigation into Syria chemical weapon incident.