TRYGO:
@Gazzuzz. You de funny o! I'm both o! Engineer, not a mechanic*

TRYGO:
OK. Nice feedback. We'd look for time to send our responses on autos someday.
@Gazzuzz. I think you're terribly mistaken in your analysis.

You mustn't give me a thumps up, if I don't respond on the threads you've talked about. I
don't think I need such a score from you. If the time permits, I'd respond to stuff I see, or better still, you could kindly just send me any link of car issues you think I should respond on.

¶¶¶¶¶
PS: Responding to such threads, does not necessarily mean you're competent. In some instances it could show some sort of competency. But don't always assume some kinda response on such threads, are some form of approval rating.¶¶¶¶¶¶

¶¶¶¶
Here's a scenario. You're in a class, with some dude, and each time the lecturer asks a ?, you're always the guy that answers the every of the s. In that instance, in the class, you might be tempted to make people believe that its in the answering of the lecturers questions, that shows that you're such a brilliant guy, and all of your dudes are dullards. When examination comes, you might(probability) pass the exam. But when the results of the exam finally comes out, you might say, "oboy, na me go pass the exam". You'd discover that those dudes in class you called dullards, outperformed you. ¶¶¶¶¶


As regards the wire mesh catalytic converter thing, I think you still ha e some problems deciphering in details what was done there.

######You can still just reread that thread.
The Ford Explorer 2004 V8 has being fixed some three months ago. I would definitely write on the cause effect of what really caused that engine to SEIZE, and perhaps, proffer some recommendations.########

The 149..blablabla thing. That, you already know wasn't deliberate. That was supposed to be F, and not C degrees. Except maybe you wanna say, you're a perfect human being. But for me, if there's a mistake in that article, would accept and make corrections.

My responses on that issues isn't ....as you might be insinuating.

Responding for two days? This in my view is ridiculous. I don't think I need to respond to that. But I think it would be cool you know it took those days you alleged.

Want to know the reason for the "two" days you've alleged? ITS SIMPLY BECAUSE THERE WASN'T POWER.

TRYGO:
@timifakay. That's their popular saying. Google has almost helped they that even claimed they know what they claim they don't...
How morning na?

TRYGO:
@timifakay. Have for a scan tool. Would do that so e other time. But bear in mind that this misfiring stuff occurred at 149F FFD.
But still remember, operating temperature is approx 100°C.

timifakay:

The misfiring doesn't just happen and stop at a time... It's usually continuous till rectified
Operating temperature is a range not a single temperature value.

TRYGO:
@timifakay. Are you saying you don't have intermittent misfires?
Definitely a range, got you.

TRYGO:
@timifakay. Are you saying you don't have intermittent misfires?
Definitely a range, got you.

TRYGO:
@timifakay. I don't think so sir. If you do realise that there are intermittent misfires, that would make me accept your inferences.

Well, "anyhow you want it sha".