This pictorial thread is for all those my mama say I be Igbo and efulefus who don't know the evil that Nigeria did to us. After watching this, u will understand why we hold this day dear to us

Horrible

Wao

Chai

Then stop beating the drum of war again.

Another second war gives birth to a new nation because no country on earth has survived second civil war.

Anything war again is disintegration whether the war is won by Biafrans or Nigeria.
Nothing more nothing less.

That's why some enlightened politicians especially @bokis are doing everything possible to avoid another war outbreak because they already know what the outcome would b after the war.

Dumaknesset:
Then stop beating the drum of war again.

Afonja...you can never reason with them...not at all!

This is sad.


God rest the dead and purge our land of all evil doers and drum-war beaters!

TheCabal:
Nnamdi Kanu like...
Buhari is COMING ..........

That is exactly the way Ewedu eaters run away from their fears.

see as they be ;Dsee as they be

Afonjas would soon flood this thread

This is pitiable.... Nigeria owe the former Eastern region a big public apology, we can't keep pretending, the wound is too big to heal too soon

If Biafra had d power, they would have done worse.

No one is a lesser devil in war

Who cares if u forget or not

May God help us achieve our Biafra.. Nigeria z no longer a nation

those colour pictures are so so not from biafra. coloured picture quality wasn't that good in the 60s. I'm not debunking your claim anyway.

People (mostly civilians) starved but that's because the food meant for them were being taken by the Biafra soldiers so the FG had no choice but to stop food supply to the region.

it's common sense 101. you can't keep feeding your enemies and expect to win the war on time

even the allied army attempted to starve the Germans during world war too. siege is basic war fare strategy

War is not carried on by arms alone. It is lawful to starve the hostile belligerent, armed or unarmed, so that it leads to the speedier subjugation of the enemy. … When a commander of a besieged place expels the non-combatants, in order to lessen the number of those who consume his stock of provisions, it is lawful, though an extreme measures, to drive them back, so as to hasten on the surrender.
As recently as World War II, it was still understood that a belligerent could lay siege to a place and drive fleeing civilians back to areas controlled by the enemy in order to put pressure on available food and other resources. Indeed, in the so-called High Command Case, a US post-war military commission acquitted Field Marshall Wilhelm von Leeb for his role in the brutal siege of Leningrad (September 1941–January 27, 1944) on this rationale. The opinion states:
A belligerent commander may lawfully lay siege to a place controlled by the enemy and endeavor by a process of isolation to cause its surrender. The propriety of attempting to reduce it by starvation is not questioned. Hence the cutting off every source of sustenance from without is deemed legitimate

https://www.justsecurity.org/29157/siege-warfare-starvation-civilians-war-crime/


with war comes starvation. if you can't feed your people there is no point fighting. common sense 101 more people died of starvation in WW2 than those that died in combat

One of the things doom watchers like to frighten us with is the coming world food crisis. We had an intense attack of it this week.
Sir John Eddington, our Chief Scientific Adviser, warned: ‘We have 20 years to deliver something like 40 per cent more food, 30 per cent more fresh water and 50 per cent more energy.’
The rising cost of food has been a main cause of the recent riots in Tunisia and Egypt. Empty bellies make people angry as well as hungry. Prophets predict that the next World War will be over ever-scarcer food. Well, here is news for us all. We have already had a World War over food. It was World War II.
This amazing book traces the war’s course without once mentioning the fighting. For Lizzie Collingham, an immensely learned nutritionist-historian, the war was not about the triumph of democracy over fascism. It was the ­victory of adequate diet over starvation.
She makes it impossible to think of the war in the old terms. Just to shock you into paying attention she begins with a statistic: at least 20 million people died during the war of starvation. The number of military deaths was 19.5 million. In other words, the deadliest weapon was starvation.

www.dailymail.co.uk/home/books/article-1351152/Q-What-deadliest-weapon-World-War-II-A-Starvation-killed-20-million-people-THE-TASTE-OF-WAR-BY-LIZZIE-COLLINGHAM.html