Question: Why does “orthodox medicine” (i.e. the American Medical Assoication (AMA), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the pharmaceutial industry) all strongly endorse the use of chemotherapy, radiation and surgery, for the treatment of cancer, over the cancer treatments of natural medicine researchers and natural medicine practitioners?

Here are your five options (Choose All Correct Answers):
A) Because the cancer researchers in natural medicine don't know anything about cancer,
B) Because the cancer treatments of natural medicine are weak and ineffective,
C) Because chemotherapy can be patented, orthodox cancer treatments are massively more profitable,
D) Because orthodox medicine wants to maximize their cure rates for their cancer patients,
E) Because cancer is caused by DNA damage and natural medicine researchers don't have enough money to do that kind of research.

The only correct answer: C. In fact, the other four options are total nonsense. Safe and gentle natural cancer treatments (with 90 percent cure rates) have existed for decades.

Isn't cancer caused by DNA damage? Absolutely not. But even if it were, why would it be difficult to target and kill cancer cells even if they had DNA damage? How does DNA damage prevent cancer cells from being targeted and killed.

Many cancer researchers have developed cancer treatments which have far higher cure rates than orthodox medicine, but their cancer treatments are not being used by the medical community.

For example, the late Dr. William D. Kelley treated more than 33,000 cancer patients. Dr. Kelley was able to cure more than 90 percent of the cancer patients who went to him first. This means only 10 percent of his cancer patients died within five years. His cure rate is highly documented and he even wrote a book detailing his protocol.

So why doesn't the medical establishment use Dr. Kelley's cancer treatments? And why did the American Medical Association help get Dr. Kelley thrown in jail?

The reason is simple.

Dr. Kelly did not use chemotherapy, radiation and surgery. His treatments were not profitable enough for the American Medical Association and the pharmaceutical industry.

Are you sitting down. Dr. Kelley was a doctor of dentistry, turned natural medicine cancer researcher, whose cancer treatments safely targeted and killed the cancer cells (well, actually the immune system killed the cancer cells). Dr. Kelley used special diets, proteolytic enzymes, and other natural substances which allowed the immune system to identify the cancer cells and kill them.

The problem is that nothing from Mother Nature can be patented, thus it is impossible to make obscene profits using natural cancer treatments.

The bottom line is that the medical community could easily have a painless, 90 percent cure rate on newly diagnosed cancer patients, if they wanted to. All they have to do is read Dr. Kelley's book: Cancer: Curing the Incurable Without Surgery, Chemotherapy or Radiation, which is available on Amazon. But don't hold your breath.

Don't believe the nonsense that the pharmaceutical industry, medical establishment, large cancer charities and our federal government are “looking” for new cancer cures. The medical establishment could have a 90 percent cure rate for cancer tomorrow if they really wanted to cure cancer. But they never want to cure cancer because that would cut into their profits.

In fact, the FDA and AMA KNOW how to cure cancer with a 100 percent cure rate because they shut down Dr. Royal Rife, a microbiologist, whose equipment had a 100 percent cure rate against cancer. They could have stolen his ideas and created a device with a 100% cure rate or cancer. But they have no desire to cure cancer.

“Everyone should know that the ‘war on cancer' is largely a fraud.”
Linus Pauling, PhD, Two Time Nobel Prize Winner

Why such a low cure rate?

Treating diseases as “chronic diseases” is a lot more profitable than curing diseases. Curing cancer patients safely with natural products would dramatically reduce the profits of the medical community and the pharmaceutical industry. Chemotherapy, for example, is highly profitable to the medical community and pharmaceutical industry, but does far more harm than good to cancer patients (with rare exceptions).

“In 1975, the respected British medical journal Lancet reported on a study which compared the effect on cancer patients of (1) a single chemotherapy, (2) multiple chemotherapy, and (3) no treatment at all. ‘No treatment' proved a significantly better policy for patients' survival and for quality of remaining life.'”

Barry Lynes,

The Healing of Cancer – The Cures – the Cover-ups and the Solution Now. – page 9

Dr. Kelley did better than “no treatment at all” because he helped the immune system instead of ignoring it.

With this in mind, why does the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) routinely approve worthless chemotherapy drugs and persecute those who use effective natural treatments for cancer?? The reason is that the FDA has been the private police force of the pharmaceutical industry for several decades. For example, the FDA has shut down many cancer clinics which were curing cancer and has shut down many vendors of products which could cure cancer.



Ready To Get Started?

We're experts on cancer management strategies, health care guidance, and taking your life back outside the clinic.

SUBSCRIBE NOW

But by far the main job of the FDA is to rig their regulations to make it impossible for any cancer treatment from Mother Nature to be “approved” by the FDA. In this way natural medicine cannot compete with the highly profitable and worthless chemotherapy and other highly profitable patented drugs.

For example, when the FDA intentionally declares all highly effective natural cancer treatments to be “unproven” the totally corrupt medical labor union (i.e. the American Medical Association – AMA) can prohibit its members from curing cancer patients with these “unproven” cancer treatments.

Yet many of these “unproven” natural cancer treatments are painless and have a 30 times higher cure rate than the “proven” orthodox cancer treatments.

The truth is that the FDA is effectively an appendage of the pharmaceutical industry. The FDA only cares about what Big Pharma (the pharmaceutical industry) wants and they couldn't care less whether cancer patients survive their cancer. Ditto for Congress and the American Medical Association (AMA). The AMA jumped in bed with the newly emerging pharmaceutical industry in about 1907, but the AMA had been corrupt long before then.

Congress and the “medical schools” sold-out to the pharmaceutical industry shortly after the pharmaceutical-funded Flaxner Report was released in 1910.

Because of the FDA and AMA; Big Pharma makes billions of dollars a year selling dangerous and worthless drugs which are approved by the FDA and are then used by the AMA members.

But the most important ally of the pharmaceutical industry is neither the FDA nor the AMA, it is the media.

Because of the media, when a person is diagnosed with cancer they cannot run fast enough to their doctor to get filled with chemotherapy, radiation and surgery. Television show after television show glorifies the medical profession and because of this, medical doctors are exactly where people go when they get sick.

“No one understood better than Stalin that the true object of propaganda is neither to convince nor even to persuade, but to produce a uniform pattern of public utterance in which the first trace of unorthodox thought immediately reveals itself as a jarring dissonance.”
Hitler and Stalin: Parallel Lives, Alan Bullock

By using the constant repetition of seeing “medical doctors” on television, people are conditioned (the “uniform pattern of public utterance“) to believe that anyone who is not a “medical doctor” must be a quack (the “jarring dissonance“).

The media uses a tactic that can be compared to an iceberg. You hear precisely the things they want you to hear over and over and over and over again, to create the “uniform pattern of public utterance.” The things they do not want you to hear (e.g. that there are hundreds of cures for cancer in Mother Nature) are very carefully buried beneath the water where you cannot see or hear them. This is called “blacklisting.” Nothing is blacklisted more methodically than natural cures for cancer.

You simply cannot believe all of the things that are buried beneath the water that the general public knows nothing about. The media is very adept at making you think you are seeing the whole iceberg, when in fact you are only seeing a small part of the iceberg and much of what you do see is expertly designed to control your thinking.

And when you trust your television
What you get is what you got
Cause when they own the information
Oh, they can bend it all they want
John Mayer: “Waiting on the World to Change”

The goal of the media is not to inform, but to control. Four gigantic corporations (which are owned by multi-billionaires), plus the federal government, control virtually 100% of what you see and hear in the media. “Freedom of speech” was dead and cremated even before the discovery of television. I personally remember seeing television shows glorifying medical doctors when television first came out in the 1950s. Movies were glorifying smoking and medical doctors long before the 1950s.

The pharmaceutical industry pays the media well for their loyalty. Their payment is in the form of advertising fees.

The skill of the media is why virtually every human being absolutely refuses to believe that there are alternative natural treatments to cure cancer.

Need I even mention the massive number of things that the FDA, Big Pharma and the Department of Agriculture do to make you sick so you will need drugs? The percent of people today who are diagnosed with cancer today is about 10 times higher than it was in 1900.

The FDA approves things like mercury in vaccinations, aluminum in pots and pans (which causes dementia), aluminum in vaccinations, trans-fatty acids in foods (which causes type 2 diabetes and many other health conditions), aspartame and high fructose corn syrup in drinks, etc.

And thanks to the Department of Agriculture we have toxic poisons sprayed on our crops, we have genetically modified foods (GMO) and every year the soil has less and less trace minerals, ad nauseum.

In short, the great deception is that Big Medicine and its allies want to convince the general public that there will never be a cure for cancer. They want to convince everyone that a cure for cancer is 50 years away. A cure for cancer has always been 50 years away and a cure for cancer will always be 50 years away if they had their way.

Jesus summarized them in two words: “whited sepulcher” (Matthew 23:27). On the outside the general public sees the whitewash and believes the medical establishment is concerned about their welfare. But on the inside of the sepulcher are the dead bones of those who trust them.

Now let us talk about how natural medicine researchers deal with cancer and their amazing success at dealing with cancer.

Can Cancer Be Cured?

First, if you can safely target and kill cancer cells (as Dr. Kelley did by letting the immune system kill the cancer cells), what difference does it make that the cancer cells have DNA damage? The cancer cells are dead.

As another example, a natural molecule called laetrile (a molecule found in apple seeds, apricot seeds, etc.) can target and kill cancer cells. Dr. Philip Binzel, M.D., and Dr. John Richardson, M.D. both used liquid laetrile by I.V. to cure cancer.

In the 1920s Johanna Brandt had a 100% cure rate using purple grapes (i.e. the Brandt Grape Cure). Her treatment was ignored by the medical community long before chemotherapy was introduced. It is now known that purple grapes have at least 12 molecules that can safely kill cancer cells.

Many people have been cured of cancer by drinking a quart of carrot juice (mixed with a little beet juice) every day and having a healthier diet. And so on.

However, those cancer patients who have had chemotherapy and/or radiation will likely need some of the newer protocols that are more potent than the older protocols.

Second, did you know that cancer cells can be reverted into normal cells? This would be impossible with today's technology if DNA damage caused cancer, but it is true and it is another evidence that cancer is not caused by DNA damage.

Dr. Royal Rife, a microbiologist, was reverting cancer cells into normal cells in the 1930s, long before the discovery of DNA. Dr. Rife also had a 100 percent cure rate. The AMA (American Medical Association) wanted his cure shut down and offered to buy him out. Dr. Rife refused their “offer,” so the FDA came in and shut him down. Rife's technology has now been replicated using modern electronics, as will be discussed below.

Third, while it is true that cancer cells have DNA damage, that is not what causes cancer. The real cause of cancer was discovered in 1890 by William Russell (1852-1940). Also, Dr. Rife, in the 1930s, knew exactly what caused cancer and this knowledge led him to his 100 percent cure rate. Both of these discoveries were made long before the discovery of DNA.

The Dr. Virginia Livingston, M.D. team of researchers, who knew about DNA, were the first to describe what was causing the DNA damage. They discovered that the DNA damage cannot occur until after the cell is cancerous.

Cancer is caused by a very special type of microbe that blocks the cell's production of ATP molecules in two different ways. Dr. Livingston's researchers saw this pleomorphic microbe inside the cell nucleus where it could damage the cell's DNA. The truth is that the cell's DNA damage is caused by the same microbe which causes the cancer.

The fact is that even if orthodox medicine could “fix” the DNA damage, that would not cure cancer.

Independent Cancer Research Foundation, Inc. (ICRF) researchers discovered how the microbes block the production of ATP and they have demonstrated, as did Dr. Rife in the 1930s, that if you can target and kill all of the microbes, that are inside the cancer cells, the cancer cells will revert into normal cells. Dr. Rife used gentle electromedicine to kill these microbes, but the ICRF researchers used DMSO and chlorine dioxide.

The ICRF knows of more than 25 natural cancer treatments that revert cancer cells into normal cells. Most of these treatments were developed by the ICRF researchers. See item #2 in the ICRF Reference Manual.

The article on this website: What Causes Cancer

The media, the movie industry, the FDA, the medical establishment, all large cancer charities, all medical schools, all state governments, Congress, several government agencies (e.g. the NIH, NCI, FCC, etc.), etc. have “sold out” the cancer patients to get a piece of Big Pharma's massive money pie. “Modern medicine” is like a giant octopus, with the pharmaceutical industry in the center.

So where does all of this corruption in the media, FDA, AMA, etc. leave cancer patients? In many of the cases it leaves them dead. The “Golden Rule” has been burned and buried.

Now you know why orthodox medicine has such a low cure rate for cancer instead of a 90 percent cure rate. In fact, the worldwide cure rate for cancer is too low because the pharmaceutical industry is a worldwide entity. Only one country in the world has “Freedom of Choice in Medicine” (Ecuador).

Natural Cancer Treatments

So what is the truth about natural cancer treatments? Alternative cancer treatment researchers have refined and combined Mother Nature's treatments and now have stronger treatments than what Dr. Kelley had.

However, it must be emphasized that the cure rate of “newly diagnosed cancer patients” (who have not had chemotherapy) is about twice the cure rate of “advanced cancer patients” (who have had extensive chemotherapy and/or they have a very aggressive cancer). The gap is getting smaller, but it is still very significant.

Not even Dr. Kelley had a 90 percent cure rate on cancer patients who had been sent home to die by orthodox medicine before they went to him.

While most natural cancer treatments today include some nutritional parts of the Kelley protocol; the development of newer nutritional products, newer tactics, newer discoveries about why it is so difficult to cure certain types of cases, the development of very gentle electromedicine, etc. have allowed modern researchers to surpass the results of Dr. Kelley.

But even those cancer patients who do not survive can have a higher quality of life, their life can be extended significantly, they can be in less pain, and so on. Every year alternative cancer treatments get better and better.

Having said all of that, there are rare situations where the services of orthodox medicine are essential during an alternative cancer treatment. For example, if a tumor on the pancreas is pressing against the bile duct it is critical to seek medical help immediately to keep the patient alive. Do not depend on alternative cancer treatments to quickly shrink dangerous tumors.