Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,151,286 members, 7,811,853 topics. Date: Sunday, 28 April 2024 at 09:21 PM

Anglican Bishop Accused Of Embezzling N260m - Nairaland / General - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Anglican Bishop Accused Of Embezzling N260m (325 Views)

Youth Day: Anglican Bishop Task Parents On Moral Upbringing Of Children / Husband Of Popular Twitter Feminist (lekan Akinjide) Accused Of Rape / Anglican Bishop Said, Biafra Be Realistic About Agitation, Lack Off Unity Among (2) (3) (4)

(1) (Reply)

Anglican Bishop Accused Of Embezzling N260m by OrientDailyNews: 7:21am On Jun 06, 2018
By Olisemeka Sony (With Agency’s report)

Fresh crisis has erupted in the Lagos Diocese of the Angli­can Communion as some aggrieved members of the church have filed three applications be­fore a Lagos Division of the Feder­al High Court seeking justice over alleged embezzlement of N260 million church funds and manipu­lation of election of new bishop in the diocese by its trustees.

In addition to claiming that the election was manipulated, the ag­grieved members alleged that one of the Trustees of the church and the current Bishop of Lagos Dio­cese, Adebola Ademowo, should be ordered to refund N260 million he allegedly collected from the Diocese and used for his personal purpose.

In a statement of claim accompa­nied by statement on oath of plain­tiffs, the petitioners alleged that as Mr Ademowo’s tenure as bishop began to wind down, the trustees of the church commenced steps to­wards the election of a new bishop, and Messrs Olumakaiye and Fape were nominated for the position.

They averred that, contrary to the established principles con­tained in the constitution of the church which stipulates that elec­tions are to be conducted by secret ballot, the outgoing bishop, Mr Ademowo, began campaigning for the election of Mr Olumakaiye and took various steps to influence Mr Okoh, the Primate of the Church, and other bishops who were re­quired to vote.

These steps, they claimed, includ­ed the approval of the publication of photographs of Messrs Ademowo and Olumakaiye in the church’s calendar wherein the latter was de­scribed as the ‘godson’ and succes­sor of Mr Ademowo; the distribution of cash gifts to the bishops who were to vote as well as the exercise of undue influence on Mr Okoh.

In a complaint, some of the plain­tiffs, Messrs. Osibo and Ajayi-Bem­be, as well as another financial member of the church, Bamidele Onafeko, wrote a petition to Mr Okoh highlighting the breaches of the church’s constitution but did not receive any response. Mr Olumakaiye was later elected as the church’s new bishop.

After the election, the plantiffs wrote another letter to Mr Okoh complaining about the irregularities that marred the electoral process.

This time, the church respond­ed through its Episcopal Secretary and Registrar who wrote on Mr Okoh’s behalf urging the plaintiffs to desist from making such allega­tions. Not satisfied, the plaintiffs wrote another letter to Mr Okoh re­iterating their complaints and also stating the various acts of financial impropriety allegedly committed by Mr Ademowo in office.

The allegations include causing division and hatred among mem­bers, receipt of funds from the Di­ocesan Board for his personal use and the placing of his family mem­bers in strategic positions.

In their letter, the plaintiffs ex­pressed their concern that Mr Olumakaiye being Mr Ademowo’s “godson” would cover up the said acts committed by the Bishop while in office.

In his reply, Mr Okoh told the plaintiffs their letter had been for­warded to Mr Ademowo for his reaction. In his response to the Primate, Mr Ademowo admitted the receipt of N200 million and N60 million for the construction of his personal residence and the pur­chase of a car respectively.

The registrar of the church then wrote a letter to the plaintiffs on behalf of Mr Okoh stating that their complaints as regards the financial impropriety would be referred to the Diocesan Board of Lagos Diocese and that the Dean of the Church would constitute an independent committee to consid­er the allegations of pre-electoral malpractices against Messrs Ade­mowo and Olumakaiye.

The plaintiffs averred that Mr Okoh is one of the appointers of the Dean of the Church of Nigeria, and a committee set up by him to inves­tigate the manipulation of electoral process in which the Primate him­self is implicated cannot be said to be independent or impartial.

The plaintiffs averred further that the Diocesan Board of Lagos Dio­cese, to which the allegations of Mr Ademowo’s financial impropriety were referred, was the body that released the sums admitted to have been received by the former bishop and, therefore, cannot possibly be relied upon to give an impartial de­cision on their complaints.

The plaintiffs then contended that Mr Okoh breached his fiducia­ry duty by failing to countenance the allegation of pre-electoral breaches made by them, and fail­ing to prevent the conduct of the election, despite having been noti­fied of the actions of Messrs Ade­mowo and Olumakaiye.

The plaintiffs also averred that Mr Ademowo breached his fidu­ciary duties to the plaintiffs and members of Lagos Diocese in influ­encing the outcome of the election to the office of Bishop of Lagos Di­ocese, and various acts of financial impropriety committed by him
Consequently, the plaintiffs sought a declaration of the court compelling Mr Ademowo to imme­diately refund to the church the 260 million with interest at the rate of 22 per cent per annum from March 1 until full and final liquidation.


They also sought an order directing the conduct of fresh election for the po­sition of Bishop of the Lagos Diocese.

In a notice of preliminary objec­tion filed by four Senior Advocates of Nigeria, Bambo Adesanya, Babatunde Ajibade, Wale Olawo­yin and Adeniyi Adegbomire, on behalf of Mr Ademowo, they con­tended that the issues raised in the plaintiffs’ action are not justifi­able in a court of law.

According to them, the issues be­long to the domestic terrain of the Church of Nigeria Anglican Com­munion as enshrined in the consti­tution and canon of the Church of Nigeria and the constitution of the Diocesan Synod of the Diocese of Lagos Anglican communion.

They stated further that, even if the Federal High Court had juris­diction to entertain the plaintiffs’ action, the court should in this case, decline jurisdiction as the plaintiffs have not exhausted the remedies provided by the constitution of the Church of Nigeria and the Diocese of Lagos before filing the action.

The lawyers further argued that it was the High Court of Lagos State that has the jurisdiction to entertain the action, adding that the plaintiffs had no legal right to institute the suit. They, therefore, urged the court to dismiss or strike out the suit for want of jurisdiction.

Meanwhile, the petitioners, in their latest suits, are seeking, among other things, a relief for the judge handling the suit, Mojisola Olatoregun, to excuse herself from the case. Another relief by the plain­tiffs is a prayer to join one Abimbola Bode-Thomas, one of the concerned elders of the Lagos Diocese, as a plaintiff while Adebola Ayodeji Ojo­feitimi, a reverend and the Provost of the Lagos Diocese, who played a pivotal role in the installation and enthronement of bishops, be made a defendant in the suit.

This is to enable them to be bound by the court’s decision, the members said.

The plaintiffs are also urging the court to restrain the defen­dants and their agents from taking any step to enthrone Humphrey Olumakaiye as the new Bishop of Lagos Diocese pending the hear­ing and determination of the suit.

The plaintiffs, who identified themselves as prominent financial members and elders of the church, are suing for themselves and on behalf of concerned members of the Lagos Diocese of the Church of Nigeria (Anglican Communion). They include Fola Osibo, Modupe Alakija, Oluyomi Finnih, Femi Ad­eniyi-William, Layi Ajayi-Bembe, Laide Sasegbon, Modupe Sagoe, Ade Abisogun, Bukola Meadows, and Molara Otuyelu.

Joined as defendants in the suit are the Registered Trustees of the Church of Nigeria (Anglican Com­munion); The Lagos Diocese of the Church of Nigeria (Anglican Com­munion); and Reverends Nicholas Okoh; Adebola Ademowo; Hum­phrey Olumakaiye; Michael Fape.

The case was initially assigned to Chuka Obiozor, a professor and judge at the Lagos Division of the Federal High Court, but later re-as­signed to Ms Olatoregun. Howev­er, the defendants wrote a letter to Ms Olatoregun asking her to re­cuse herself on the ground that she is a communicant and a devoted member of the church.

At the last hearing, the judge, in open court, transferred the case file to another judge, Rilwan Aikawa, of the same Lagos Division.
The case has now been ad­journed till June 21 for hearing.


https://orientdailynews.com.ng/news/anglican-bishop-accused-embezzling-n260m/



lalasticlala seun mynd44

(1) (Reply)

Why Are Nairaland Igbos Cry Babies? / Swiss Garde Aloe Power / Houses For Rent In Lekki

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 41
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.