Risks of man-made brainpower (Artificial Intelligence (Ai))

Artificial intelligence (AI) is making an extraordinary passageway into relatively every aspect of society in anticipated and unexpected ways, causing both fervor and anxiety.

As robotization turns out to be progressively advanced, there is no doubt that AI is upsetting individuals' everyday occupations. Thus, the buzz has generally centered around whether AI will put individuals out of work versus whether it will move work to more gainful undertakings, as computerization takes the snort work off of everyone's plate.

A report as of late composed by artificial consciousness specialists from industry and the scholarly world has a reasonable message: Every AI progress by the great folks is a progress for the awful folks, as well.

The paper, titled "The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigation," calls this the "double utilize" trait of AI, which means the innovation's capacity to settle on a large number of complex choices consistently could be utilized to both help or mischief individuals, contingent upon the individual outlining the framework.

The specialists considered the noxious employments of AI that either right now exists or could be created throughout the following five years, and broke them out into three gatherings: computerized, physical, and political.

Here is a chosen rundown of the potential damages:

Computerized

•Automated phishing, or making counRead all here

AI is the only part of technology that I don't really appreciate. It's making life boring and taking people's jobs away.

Simonrom:
AI is the only part of technology that I don't really appreciate. It's making life boring and taking people's jobs away.

I disagree with you it's actually making life interesting.. But i hate the fact that people are loosing jobs because of it

Story story,

I once read an article, the author evaluated the expectations of the tech oriented people (half a century ago) of how the future (half a century forward - which is now) would be. People dreamt of working in underwater cities, living in 'capsules', consuming food as pills, finding a solution to death among others...

The author abruptly stopped to first, remind us we are in the future (half a century forward from their time) and how the pants/trousers you're using was invented about 5000 years ago and still basically the original idea!.

Why did I bring this story up?

I've worked/I work with and understand AI systems to a certain degree and I can assure you that most of what we (humans) think of AI is unrealistic/not feasible in the nearest future and are mostly influenced by man made propaganda.

Lets talk about one of the most recent AI achievements (which is closest to 'stealing' jobs) from google which is: AI can now organise appointments/schedule your work.
You may now say "Oh no, AI has stolen the job from personal assistants!" but ask yourself, how efficient is it? How many people are willing to use that kind of service? Are you one of them?
Whatever your answers are, it would be key to note that "scheduling appointments" is just a tiny portion of the overall job of who ever does it, say PA.

********

Abandon a human in a forest and return after a long time, you're most likely to find him alive and fresh.

For AI to accomplish 75% of what people fear, they must have evolved into a notable species. When they (computers) wouldn't need human help for 90% of what must keep them alive/recognizable as a specie.
Not just, in most cases, sitting on a desk and 'thinking'.

In the post, subtle but dangerous 'takeover' measure that could be employed by AI were highlighted. But those are things we've signed up for. If you read the post you see something like "ARTIFICIAL CONSCIOUSNESS", such phrase makes it clear that we are knowingly/unknowingly OK with AI evolving into an independent specie.
Dan Brown in his 2017 novel, Origin, (fictionally) explained how it is imminent for a specie to dominate humans someday, how we (evidently) dominated other species and by implication made many go extinct, how the biological clock is still ticking AND how whatever WILL dominate us must not necessarily be a biological specie.

In sum: Many of our inventions go wrong, many don't. AI is our invention.

Other tools/inventions includes your phone, kekenapep, cars, shoes, radio, cloths, nuclear weapons, tv, simcards, pen and paper, bed/matrass, PC.

We can only hope for the best and expect/prepare for the worse.


########

As for Simonrom,
if (you have not heard of Mitsuku (an AI application)){
You can have a chat with her on www.mitsuku.co.uk now and please give us feedback of your experience and conclusion of AI boring things.
}



Sincerely, badthinds.

badthinds:
Story story,

I once read an article, the author evaluated the expectations of the tech oriented people (half a century ago) of how the future (half a century forward - which is now) would be. People dreamt of working in underwater cities, living in 'capsules', consuming food as pills, finding a solution to death among others...

The author abruptly stopped to first, remind us we are in the future (half a century forward from their time) and how the pants/trousers you're using was invented about 5000 years ago and still basically the original idea!.

Why did I bring this story up?

I've worked/I work with and understand AI systems to a certain degree and I can assure you that most of what we (humans) think of AI is unrealistic/not feasible in the nearest future and are mostly influenced by man made propaganda.

Lets talk about one of the most recent AI achievements (which is closest to 'stealing' jobs) from google which is: AI can now organise appointments/schedule your work.
You may now say "Oh no, AI has stolen the job from personal assistants!" but ask yourself, how efficient is it? How many people are willing to use that kind of service? Are you one of them?
Whatever your answers are, it would be key to note that "scheduling appointments" is just a tiny portion of the overall job of who ever does it, say PA.

********

Abandon a human in a forest and return after a long time, you're most likely to find him alive and fresh.

For AI to accomplish 75% of what people fear, they must have evolved into a notable species. When they (computers) wouldn't need human help for 90% of what must keep them alive/recognizable as a specie.
Not just, in most cases, sitting on a desk and 'thinking'.

In the post, subtle but dangerous 'takeover' measure that could be employed by AI were highlighted. But those are things we've signed up for. If you read the post you see something like "ARTIFICIAL CONSCIOUSNESS", such phrase makes it clear that we are knowingly/unknowingly OK with AI evolving into an independent specie.
Dan Brown in his 2017 novel, Origin, (fictionally) explained how it is imminent for a specie to dominate humans someday, how we (evidently) dominated other species and by implication made many go extinct, how the biological clock is still ticking AND how whatever WILL dominate us must not necessarily be a biological specie.

In sum: Many of our inventions go wrong, many don't. AI is our invention.

Other tools/inventions includes your phone, kekenapep, cars, shoes, radio, cloths, nuclear weapons, tv, simcards, pen and paper, bed/matrass, PC.

We can only hope for the best and expect/prepare for the worse.


########

As for Simonrom,
if (you have not heard of Mitsuku (an AI application)){
You can have a chat with her on www.mitsuku.co.uk now and please give us feedback of your experience and conclusion of AI boring things.
}



Sincerely, badthinds.

Nice man