Fuckingmallam45:

I feel u, copy nd paste names. Name wey u no fit pronounce

You look like a dumb ass. Mr man, I can never be so dumb that i cannot spell any word I set my eyes on. You have already concluded that you can't spell Srivaddhanaprabha. Lazy brain. Srivaddhanaprabha! Srivaddhanaprabha!! Srivaddhanaprabha!!! What about Blaszczykowski. Henrikh Mkhitaryan. We no be mate for spelling!

Pekele007:

You complained against Chelsea and still complained against Bournemouth again

.Na the extra time u take win today o.

it's injury time not extra time sir.

msylva2147:
it's injury time not extra time sir.

who got injured?

Aystarz:


With love from Arsenal ko. Why not use the right words : With love from your bet9ja slips.

Sharp G

PureMe01:
pass me the weed bruv

i dont smoke. u supos no say na typo error. #peace

igwefivestar:
oga put the sentiment in ur bag, the players are fantastic they just need a good coach.

U still don't ans my question...5man u players that wld mk man city,Liverpool or Chelsea team 1st eleven?

Geist:
They are all good players playing badly as a team. If Alexis did not come in cheap due to his contract almost running out do you know how much he would have cost Manu? Lets talk about how much martial cost Manu. If not that his career has stagnated due to bad coaches he ought to be in the bracket of the likes of mpape what of pogba? None of those team would have a pogba and bench him. It is the same Chelsea team that played last season that is playing this season with the exception of jorginho. Football is a team sport and not an individual sport and that's one thing morinho seems to have lost. He can't seem to keep his team playing as one for more than a season. Infact I can argue that all his teams often seem to rely on exploiting the oppositions weakness rather than harnessing it's own strength. So his players always look crap.

U still don't ans my question...5man u players that wld mk man city,Liverpool or Chelsea team 1st eleven?

GGMU!

ncoolsome:



U still don't ans my question...5man u players that wld mk man city,Liverpool or Chelsea team 1st eleven?

Dude you dey ask question like say you no sabi football. What do you want to use the five players for? If your question aims at questioning the quality of Manu players then I have already answered you. All four of Manu strikers are either better or and least equal to Chelsea strikers. De gea is a better goalkeeper to Kepa. To make my point clearer look at Juan Mata. Mata was in the same team harzard played for two seasons and outshines him anytime any day. Then morinho came and instead of playing Mata where he is best at, the center. He decides to move him to the right. Why? So that he play a more defensive minded midfielder. Since then we have never seen the Mata we once knew at Chelsea. Hazard his playing arguably his beat football right now why? Because of the system Sarri is playing. Before now he never had an offensive minded coach at Chelsea. Morinho was at Chelsea sold sala and debryune. Manu has arguably spent as much as man city have spent yet nothing to show for it. Morinho bought Sanchez who is not even needed in that team as far as I am concerned. Fred is yet to hit his heights, heck we are even yet to see pogba at his full potential for Manu and he his crying the board did not back him with the players he wants. I laugh my brother.

igwefivestar:
oga put the sentiment in ur bag, the players are fantastic they just need a good coach.

So Van Gaal and Mourinho who has won two champion leagues are not good?

Geist:
Dude you dey ask question like say you no sabi football. What do you want to use the five players for? If your question aims at questioning the quality of Manu players then I have already answered you. All four of Manu strikers are either better or and least equal to Chelsea strikers. De gea is a better goalkeeper to Kepa. To make my point clearer look at Juan Mata. Mata was in the same team harzard played for two seasons and outshines him anytime any day. Then morinho came and instead of playing Mata where he is best at, the center. He decides to move him to the right. Why? So that he play a more defensive minded midfielder. Since then we have never seen the Mata we once knew at Chelsea. Hazard his playing arguably his beat football right now why? Because of the system Sarri is playing. Before now he never had an offensive minded coach at Chelsea. Morinho was at Chelsea sold sala and debryune. Manu has arguably spent as much as man city have spent yet nothing to show for it. Morinho bought Sanchez who is not even needed in that team as far as I am concerned. Fred is yet to hit his heights, heck we are even yet to see pogba at his full potential for Manu and he his crying the board did not back him with the players he wants. I laugh my brother.

Who is a good 11 at the level or quality of Hazard and Mane apart from Sanchez? What is Manu without those players Mourinho bought?

Why does Mourinho bench Herrera while playing small boys? Maybe the Manu board holds the answers to that. How can Manu do well without best among them; Herrera?

princfred:
Who is a good 11 at the level or quality of Hazard and Mane apart from Sanchez? What is Manu without those players Mourinho bought?

Abeg I don tire for Una argument. Maybe you want to go look at the the teams sir Alex used before he retired and compare them with what city and Chelsea had. Do you know how old rashford is? Do you know how many caps he has for both club and country? When did you start regarding mane as a quality player? I bet it was only when he started playing for klopp. Look Kevin debryne. Mourinho actually had such quality player in Chelsea but choose to sell him cheap to gladbarch and what he spent only a season there before man city bought him for more than thrice the amount Chelsea sold him. If I may ask how do you identify a top quality player?

Geist:
Abeg I don tire for Una argument. Maybe you want to go look at the the teams sir Alex used before he retired and compare them with what city and Chelsea had. Do you know how old rashford is? Do you know how many caps he has for both club and country? When did you start regarding mane as a quality player? I bet it was only when he started playing for klopp. Look Kevin debryne. Mourinho actually had such quality player in Chelsea but choose to sell him cheap to gladbarch and what he spent only a season there before man city bought him for more than thrice the amount Chelsea sold him. If I may ask how do you identify a top quality player?

Chelsea squad had an excess of quality players then most detected and bought by Mourinho so some decided to leave because they were not getting regular shirt. Fergie was winning more by his clout over referees than quality. Make was always a good player even before Lfc bought him I ask you questions answer them. Small boys football which the board insist Mourinho does don't work in contemporary football for big teams. Small boys make good first in small/medium teams to earn being bought by big teams not big teams dumbing down their team with inexperienced unproven learners which is what overhyped (based on being English) Rashford is. Imagine who wears no 19 jersey for united. Mourinho's first year was good until the club insisted on him always playing small boys. Imagine Herrera being benched while Rashhord sees regular shirt. That's an aberration .

princfred:
Chelsea squad had an excess of quality players then most detected and bought by Mourinho so some decided to leave because they were not getting regular shirt. Fergie was winning more by his clout over referees than quality. Make was always a good player even before Lfc bought him I ask you questions answer them. Small boys football which the board insist Mourinho does don't work in contemporary football for big teams. Small boys make good first in small/medium teams to earn being bought by big teams not big teams dumbing down their team with inexperienced unproven learners which is what overhyped (based on being English) Rashford is. Imagine who wears no 19 jersey for united. Mourinho's first year was good until the club insisted on him always playing small boys. Imagine Herrera being benched while Rashhord sees regular shirt. That's an aberration .

Which board is insisting on who mourinho plays? Abegi, I can bet you mourinho would be the first to resign his job if the board starts telling him who to play. Based on what you have said which manu players has not played for small teams and improved those teams aside rashford? All. I don't want to go on and argue with you about rashfords quality. Anthony martial was the golden boy of Monaco before Manu bought him. Lukaku was an ever present force for Everton and scored an average of 20 goals in his last two seasons with Everton before Manu. Sanchez is a whole story all together. What about your midfield? Pogba from juve. Matic from Chelsea, Mata from Chelsea. I can go on and on. What of Marcos rojo that playing for sporting, smalling played for Fulham and reached the Europa league final with Fulham before joining Manu abeg go and read all your players profile and tell me which one had an average season before joining. Infact unlike clubs like Chelsea that buy players that the coach sometimes does not ask for. It's only the players that are recommended by the coach that Manu buys. I don't know how you can turn round now and say they are not good.

Geist:
They are all good players playing badly as a team. If Alexis did not come in cheap due to his contract almost running out do you know how much he would have cost Manu? Lets talk about how much martial cost Manu. If not that his career has stagnated due to bad coaches he ought to be in the bracket of the likes of mpape what of pogba? None of those team would have a pogba and bench him. It is the same Chelsea team that played last season that is playing this season with the exception of jorginho. Football is a team sport and not an individual sport and that's one thing morinho seems to have lost. He can't seem to keep his team playing as one for more than a season. Infact I can argue that all his teams often seem to rely on exploiting the oppositions weakness rather than harnessing it's own strength. So his players always look crap.

Its the club management who always makes things hard for Mourinho. He comes into a delipidated team, they have no face to tell him sh*t since their team is akready in a mess so he does his thing his way and gets good results suddenly the club managenent remembers they are the boss, want to ride on the new found glory and starts making counterproductive demands by trying to dictate game style, starting 11 for him based on some expired team tradition, wet dreams etc for him he gets too distracted trying to appease the board soo much that the entire team implodes.

In his last season at chelsea, i remember how they were all bugging him to always start, play and turn loftus cheek into the next Paul Scholes just because he is an Englishman and just like Manu is doing with Rashford now, how they wanted barca fancy style so Mou had to play Fabregas till the teams performance plumetted. Now, no one is bugging Sari ( and even Conte then) on those issues.

princfred:
Its the club management who always makes things hard for Mourinho. He comes into a delipidated team, they have no face to tell him sh*t since their team is akready in a mess so he does his thing his way and gets good results suddenly the club managenent remembers they are the boss, want to ride on the new found glory and starts making counterproductive demands by trying to dictate game style, starting 11 for him based on some expired team tradition, wet dreams etc for him he gets too distracted trying to appease the board soo much that the entire team implodes.

In his last season at chelsea, i remember how they were all bugging him to always start, play and turn loftus cheek into the next Paul Scholes just because he is an Englishman and just like Manu is doing with Rashford now, how they wanted barca fancy style so Mou had to play Fabregas till the teams performance plumetted. Now, no one is bugging Sari ( and even Conte then) on those issues.

from where are you getting all these information from? They are pure lies or just mere conspiracy theories with no shred of evidence. I repeat Mourinho is not the type of coach whom anybody would force to play any player. He can decide to bench pogba if he so pleases. The worst that would happen is the club would fire him and another club would snap him up. Go and look at all top coaches, they really don't have much to loose other than their ego if they decide to bench any fucking player. Loftus cheek ko, soft lips ni. and right after forcing mourinho to play him they would then sack mourinho then employ anthonio conte to loan the same loftus cheek to crystal palace abi. Abegi come up with something else.

Geist:
from where are you getting all these information from? They are pure lies or just mere conspiracy theories with no shred of evidence. I repeat Mourinho is not the type of coach whom anybody would force to play any player. He can decide to bench pogba if he so pleases. The worst that would happen is the club would fire him and another club would snap him up. Go and look at all top coaches, they really don't have much to loose other than their ego if they decide to bench any fucking player. Loftus cheek ko, soft lips ni. and right after forcing mourinho to play him they would then sack mourinho then employ anthonio conte to loan the same loftus cheek to crystal palace abi. Abegi come up with something else.

If you dont know that management does pressure and influence coaches or just claiming so then you are way too out of touch to discuss football. They may not tell him who to bench but pressure him on who they would love to see play which inevitably means some else has to be benched. Example Manu lays emphasize that their tradition is youth development how can Mourinho achieve that. You think normal classic Mourinho will give Rashford jersy 10 and manU gave Rashford 10 jersey to sit on the bench?


Where was manu before Mourinho came that you now want to put all Manu woes on him? Why was Van sacked ? Was he such a wrong and terrible coach too? Whats the constant between Van Gaals failure then and that of Mourinho now?

princfred:
Of you font know that management does pressure and influence coaches or just claiming so then you are way too out of touch to discuss football. They may not tell him who to bench but pressure him on who they would love to see play which inevitably means some else has to be benched. Example Manu lays emphasize that their tradition is youth development how can Mourinho achieve that. You think normal classic Mourinho will give Rashford jersy 10 and manU gave Rashford 10 jersey to sit on the bench?


Where was manu before Mourinho came that you now want to put all Manu woes on him? Why was Van sacked ? Was he such a wrong and terrible coach too? Whats the constant between Van Gaals failure then and that of Mourinho now?

There's only two things any board cares about and that's winning trophies and making money. Any other thing they may seem to care about are always linked to those two I mentioned and this is because a clubs success are measured by how many trophies and how much they make. Since sir Alex departure, the board has spent crazy amount of money. From di Maria to pogba. Racking up wage bills. I remember the crazy wage offered to Luke Shaw which Chelsea even refused to pay but Manu because they wanted to overall the team then agreed to it. Luke Shaw by the way was a Chelsea fan and only choose Manu ahead of Chelsea because of the money. Chelsea later went for azpilicueta. Lukakus case was also similar. This board has been spending like crazy with no results on the coaches end. The acquisition of Sanchez is another example of how the board is spending money on crazy wage bills on players they don't need who are even under performing. If you are in that board and people are asking you for more money to buy foreign players won't you tell the coach to go and look into the academy? I repeat non of the board members give a Bleep who is playing. Some are not even football fanatics like us. So as long as the team is winning they will always support the coach. An example of this is with Chelsea under anthonio Conte. Even though the board has been shouting about how they want an attractive brand of football they still wen ahead and supported Conte with his defensive brand of football. Bought 3 or 4 defensive midfielders just because he carried the premier league but the time he lost that winning touch they sacked him. Loaned out bakayoko. Danny drinkwater will be the next to leave soon. So you see not all his as clear as black and white. Me I don't see the spending that Manu want to do again to improve this team. They have been spending since. Go and check wage bill of all the Chelsea players and compare them with Manu. You will be shocked. Manu is gradually turning to Chelsea of old that will buy a player for excessive amount and the player will not do anything. Just look at how depay is now playing for Lyon but was crap with Manu. I rest my case bros

Geist:
There's only two things any board cares about and that's winning trophies and making money. Any other thing they may seem to care about are always linked to those two I mentioned and this is because a clubs success are measured by how many trophies and how much they make. Since sir Alex departure, the board has spent crazy amount of money. From di Maria to pogba. Racking up wage bills. I remember the crazy wage offered to Luke Shaw which Chelsea even refused to pay but Manu because they wanted to overall the team then agreed to it. Luke Shaw by the way was a Chelsea fan and only choose Manu ahead of Chelsea because of the money. Chelsea later went for azpilicueta. Lukakus case was also similar. This board has been spending like crazy with no results on the coaches end. The acquisition of Sanchez is another example of how the board is spending money on crazy wage bills on players they don't need who are even under performing. If you are in that board and people are asking you for more money to buy foreign players won't you tell the coach to go and look into the academy? I repeat non of the board members give a Bleep who is playing. Some are not even football fanatics like us. So as long as the team is winning they will always support the coach. An example of this is with Chelsea under anthonio Conte. Even though the board has been shouting about how they want an attractive brand of football they still wen ahead and supported Conte with his defensive brand of football. Bought 3 or 4 defensive midfielders just because he carried the premier league but the time he lost that winning touch they sacked him. Loaned out bakayoko. Danny drinkwater will be the next to leave soon. So you see not all his as clear as black and white. Me I don't see the spending that Manu want to do again to improve this team. They have been spending since. Go and check wage bill of all the Chelsea players and compare them with Manu. You will be shocked. Manu is gradually turning to Chelsea of old that will buy a player for excessive amount and the player will not do anything. Just look at how depay is now playing for Lyon but was crap with Manu. I rest my case bros

What you are saying is way too black and white and out of touch with reality to be anywhere near the truth. Likely you are speaking from your young naïve sense of elderado. Local NFF which gave Rohr free hand before are now talking about him inviting more local league players after he seems to be doing just fine yet if things happen to go wrong as he tries to adapt to their new demands, thesame board will sack him. Humans in nature want and demand for more. Boards look into more things than just money and trophy. They are very much interested in style of play, club tradition, fans satisfaction etc.

Which big team in contemporary times are doing well based on academy players? Because other coaches spent money and didn't get it right does not mean spending big to land big players is wrong or does not work neither does it mean that Mourinho will fail after spending big like the others nor that not spending but relying on academy players will work.

Depay and others may be more psychologically fitter for a smaller club first before transiting to bigger ones.
I asked you lots of questions which will help you understand but you prefer to beat around. Answer those questions and learn. How many players of Rashfords level are regualer starters in Chelsea now or LFc, Zidanes madrid, Mancity that you want Mourinho to mimic? Manu now is more like Arsenal of old with small small boys who win today lose tomorrow and couldn't win any trophy beyond FA cup..

princfred:
What you are saying is way too black and white and out of touch with reality to be anywhere near the truth. Likely you are speaking from your young naïve sense of elderado. Local NFF which gave Rohr free hand before are now talking about him inviting more local league players after he seems to be doing just fine yet if things happen to go wrong as he tries to adapt to their new demands, thesame board will sack him. Humans in nature want and demand for more. Boards look into more things than just money and trophy. They are very much interested in style of play, club tradition, fans satisfaction etc.

Which big team in contemporary times are doing well based on academy players? Because other coaches spent money and didn't get it right does not mean spending big to land big players is wrong or does not work neither does it mean that Mourinho will fail after spending big like the others nor that not spending but relying on academy players will work.

Depay and others may be more psychologically fitter for a smaller club first before transiting to bigger ones.
I asked you lots of questions which will help you understand but you prefer to beat around. Answer those questions and learn. How many players of Rashfords level are regualer starters in Chelsea now or LFc, m Zidanes madrid Mancity that you want Mourinho to mimic? Manu now is more like Arsenal of old with small small boys who win today lose tomorrow and couldn't win any trophy beyond FA cup..

Oga I have heard. You are more knowledgeable and well versed than I am. The fact that you would compare a club board with football federation or the Nigerian football fedration already speaks to the wealth of knowledge of knowledge. NFF that even Buhari can tell them to sack and unsack coach. Abeg I gree

Geist:
Oga I have heard. You are more knowledgeable and well versed than I am. The fact that you would compare a club board with football federation or the Nigerian football fedration already speaks to the wealth of knowledge of knowledge. NFF that even Buhari can tell them to sack and unsack coach. Abeg I gree

It is similar approach of the board towards a coach am talking about not relationship with presidiency. A board when the team is in mess gives a coach, especially new one free hand to just do his thing, but immediately the winning ensues, they demand more than just winning nudging the coach to do more of this or that yet sacks the coach if the team stops winning in his bid to adapt to the boards new demands. You must be a teenager or something if this is too hard for you to understand. Why do you think its unlikely for FC Barca to make Mourinho their coach unless maybe they are in serious mess of long term trophy drought even if he wins extra 3 ECL? Let me help you with the answer to this one before your brain goes into mental gymnastics and shagallo on that - Not the two options you limits the board's concern to (money making nor lack of potential to win trophies) but because his style of football does not concur with theirs not minding his trophy-winning capability
Mourinho being wiser after his debacle with Chelsea board and knowing this got himself a very fat pay-off if Manu sacks him knowing fully well he be liable to be sacked since the he knows the small boys the board wants him to work with can't do jack.

Don't just say you've won because my aim is not to win or lose but to help you understand football realities instead answer the questions I asked rather than resorting to reading history, unrelated sarcasm and misrepresentative innuendos.
You want ManU to be like Zidane's Madrid or Conte's Chelsea with a Rashford and Mctominay in the starting 11. Are you high on piss? You see their mate and level for those big teams?
In contemporary times, unproven academy players dont do enough consistency to win big trophies such as EPL and ECL only FA cups and big players are costly if thats beyond your observation scope or brain processing power even when its glaringly pointed out then stop talking football with senior men of the beautiful and just stick to watching from the back of the the big screen.

princfred:
It is similar approach of the board towards a coach am talking about not relationship with presidiency. A board when the team is in mess gives a coach, especially new one free hand to just do his thing, but immediately the winning ensues, they demand more than just winning nudging the coach to do more of this or that yet sacks the coach if the team stops winning in his bid to adapt to the boards new demands. You must be a teenager or something if this is too hard for you to understand. Why do you think its unlikely for FC Barca to make Mourinho their coach unless maybe they are in serious mess of long term trophy drought even if he wins extra 3 ECL? Let me help you with the answer to this one before your brain goes into mental gymnastics and shagallo on that - Not the two options you limits the board's concern to (money making nor lack of potential to win trophies) but because his style of football does not concur with theirs not minding his trophy-winning capability
Mourinho being wiser after his debacle with Chelsea board and knowing this got himself a very fat pay-off if Manu sacks him knowing fully well he be liable to be sacked since the he knows the small boys the board wants him to work with can't do jack.

Don't just say you've won because my aim is not to win or lose but to help you understand football realities instead answer the questions I asked rather than resorting to reading history, unrelated sarcasm and misrepresentative innuendos.
You want ManU to be like Zidane's Madrid or Conte's Chelsea with a Rashford and Mctominay in the starting 11. Are you high on piss? You see their mate and level for those big teams?
In contemporary times, unproven academy players dont do enough consistency to win big trophies such as EPL and ECL only FA cups and big players are costly if thats beyond your observation scope or brain processing power even when its glaringly pointed out then stop talking football with senior men of the beautiful and just stick to watching from the back of the the big screen.

bro what else do you want? This is already turning into a cursed word session I know you all enjoy these days on the internet and I don't. If all want is to win the argument then by all mean I proclaim you the winner or proclaim yourself. You cannot however force me to accept the whole pile of horse shit you put up there. Which useless academy tradition Manu get sef? when last did Manu produce any top academy players even under sir Alex? where jesse lingard rashford getting as much playing time? Bros you sef funny. Stop think a little and ask yourself. If you're a coach and you are winning, you have all the bragging right, you can raise your shoulder, quit and you would not be short of people who want to recruit you. Is that when you would allow anybody tell you anything? Just imagine Man city's board now trying to force pep to play certain players, when can easily get annoyed and threaten to leave. The same plays out in top companies around the world. Once the executives are doing well and making money, they are left alone to do their thing once they are not then they start to behave like they can run the business themselves. If you want to change the narrative to fit your own world view by all mean do. Call me a small boy won't change anything. You have already dragged this argument out of context sef. bye bye

Geist:
bro what else do you want? This is already turning into a cursed word session I know you all enjoy these days on the internet and I don't. If all want is to win the argument then by all mean I proclaim you the winner or proclaim yourself. You cannot however force me to accept the whole pile of horse shit you put up there. Which useless academy tradition Manu get sef? when last did Manu produce any top academy players even under sir Alex? where jesse lingard rashford getting as much playing time? Bros you sef funny. Stop think a little and ask yourself. If you're a coach and you are winning, you have all the bragging right, you can raise your shoulder, quit and you would not be short of people who want to recruit you. Is that when you would allow anybody tell you anything? Just imagine Man city's board now trying to force pep to play certain players, when can easily get annoyed and threaten to leave. The same plays out in top companies around the world. Once the executives are doing well and making money, they are left alone to do their thing once they are not then they start to behave like they can run the business themselves. If you want to change the narrative to fit your own world view by all mean do. Call me a small boy won't change anything. You have already dragged this argument out of context sef. bye bye

Why can't you think straight and logical for once "you proclaim me winner yet cant see the facts presented and persist in arguing about it"? Are you blind to where i said its not about winner or loser with me? Na you to tell Manu board their tradition abi na them to tell you? I asked you simple questions but its clear beating about and accusing me of what you are doing is the way your brain works to run from facts. The fact remains that in modern football, board interference is not black and white nor only about or ends at money and trophy. Different boards urge, nudge and if possible coarse coaches to do certain things differently outside the limits of only money and trophies. If that is beyond you then just borrow the sense am lending you here.

How could i easily deduce you are a small boy if not for how simplistic, naïve and out of touch and even undirectional your reasoning is?

Pekele007:


who got injured?

That's what it's called in football sir. Extra time is only when the match require 30 minutes before penalty if there's no winner within the 30 minutes given, but any delay during the stipulated 90 minutes being it injury or not is considered an injury time because the ref will stop his watch during the period of delay except if it's time for substitution that's why when someone is is sluggish in going out during substitution the ref will issue a yellow card to the player.