4evergod3's Posts
Nairaland Forum › 4evergod3's Profile › 4evergod3's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 (of 34 pages)
Great offer |
I HAVE 2 UNITS OF 3 BEDROOM DUPLEXES TO LET IN THOMAS ESTATE AJAH. FEATURES INCLUDE; 1. LOVELY KITCHEN WITH NICE CABINETS AND VERY SPACIOUS 2. HUGE LIVING ROOM WITH DINING [DOWNSTAIRS] 3. VISITORS TOILET DOWNSTAIRS 4. FAMILY LOUNGE UPSTAIRS 5. BOTH ROOMS ENSUITE WITH BATHTUBS [UPSTAIRS] 6. STUDY ROOM 7. MASTER BEDROOM IS VERY VERY SPACIOUS AND ALSO ITS BATHROOM 8. WAITING ROOM DOWNSTAIRS 9. FULLY TILED INTERIOR RENT IS 550K [1YR] CALL ME FOR INSPECTION. 07042088986 [SAM] |
Yes very possible |
great deal |
great deal |
great deal |
great deal |
elampiro: Mathew 16:17-19. ''Behold you are Peter, upon this rock I will build My church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, whatever you bind on earth is bound in heaven. Whatever you loose on earth is loosed in heaven.'' This is the authority of the Catholic church and the Pope. Here the Catholic church is bestowed extended authority far beyond the scripture. The Catholic church assembled the bible to serve as a guide. According to the bible, Jesus did many things that were not recorded. Some of them formed the tradition the tradition of the church as carried on from century to century till Lurther rebelled after more than 1,500 years of existense of the Catholic church. The Vatican city is seating on the grave of apostle Peter. The gate of hell will not prevail; heresies will come and go, errors and false prophets will come and go but the Catholic church will always hold firm.YOU ARE MISGUIDED! THIS IS THE SCRIPTURE IN ITS TRUE LIGHT. [b]Then Jesus answered Peter: "... thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it." Matthew 16:18 Catholicism contends that the Lord was referring to Peter as the rock, and has since built the entire Catholic religion upon that premise. But all other pertinent Scriptures declare that Jesus was referring to Himself as the rock, not Peter: "... for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ." 1 Corinthians 10:4 Jesus is not only the rock, He is the chief cornerstone of the church: "And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone;" Ephesians 2:20 Back in the Old Testament, it was prophesied that Jesus, whom men rejected, would become the cornerstone of the church: "The stone which the builders refused is become the head stone of the corner." Psalm 118:22 Even Peter, allegedly the first pope, confesses that Jesus Christ is the cornerstone of the church: "...by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth... This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner." Acts 4:10-11 "... the stone which the builders disallowed, the same is made the head of the corner," 1 Peter 2:7 According to Scriptures, Peter is NOT the rock: "For who is God save the LORD? or who is a rock save our God?" Psalm 18:31 "... I will publish the name of the LORD: ascribe ye greatness unto our God. He is the Rock..." Deuteronomy 32:3-4 "Truly my soul waiteth upon God... He only is my rock..." Psalm 62:1-2 "But the LORD is my defence; and my God is the rock of my refuge." Psalm 94:22 Who is the head of the church Despite all these Scriptures, Catholicism still claims that Peter was the rock and his successors are the head of the church: "The sole Church of Christ (is that) which our Savior, after his Resurrection, entrusted to Peter's pastoral care, commissioning him and the other apostles to extend and rule it... This Church, constituted and organized as a society in the present world, subsists in (subsistit in) the Catholic Church, which is governed by the successors of Peter and by the bishops in communion with him." But the Bible declares that Jesus Christ, not Peter or his successors, is the head of the church: "And he (Christ) is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he (Christ) might have the preeminence." Colossians 1:18 "And hath put all things under his feet, and gave him (Christ) to be the head over all things to the church," Ephesians 1:22 "But speaking the truth in love, may grow up into him in all things, which is the head, even Christ:" Ephesians 4:15 The biblical "church" When the Bible uses the words "the church," it always refers to all those who trust in Jesus Christ alone for salvation, not just to members of the Catholic church: "Unto the church of God which is at Corinth, to them that are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, with all that in every place call upon the name of Jesus Christ our Lord..." 1 Corinthians 1:2 The Apostle Paul wrote: "Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;" Ephesians 5:25 Paul was not a Catholic, yet he knew that Christ loved him and died for him. Certainly, no one would dare say that Paul was not a Christian because he was not a Catholic. Would anyone suggest that God only loves Catholics?... or that He only died for Catholics? Such would be the case if the Catholic church was the only church. Paul also proclaimed: "And walk in love, as Christ also hath loved us, and hath given himself for us..." Ephesians 5:2 Can non-Catholics be Christians? As the "one true church," Catholicism claims the right to determine who is or is not a Christian: "All who have been justified by faith in Baptism are incorporated into Christ; they therefore have a right to be called Christians, and with good reason are accepted as brothers in the Lord by the children of the Catholic Church. In other words, if you have not been baptized into the Catholic church, you are not a Christian. These are not my words, but the words of the official Catholic Catechism. But according to Scripture, it doesn't matter if the Catholic church has accepted you or not. If your faith is in Jesus Christ alone, then He has already accepted you: "To the praise of the glory of his grace, wherein he (Jesus) hath made us accepted in the beloved." Ephesians 1:6 Conclusion At this point, you must make a few decisions: Is Peter really the rock? The Catechism says he is, but God's Word says he is not. Is the Catholic church the one true church? The Catechism says yes, but the Bible says no. Do you really believe that all non-Catholics will burn in hell? Once again, the answers to each of these questions will be determined by which you choose to believe... the traditions of men, or God's Word. Jesus asked the Pharisees a question which all Roman Catholics should ponder: "Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition?" Matthew 15:3[/b] |
lets go there |
lets go there |
lets go there |
lets go there |
@okpurukata The percentage of paedophiles amongst clergymen in Ireland is thirty times higher than the percentage of paedophiles amongst the common people The number of paedophiles among priests in Australia is 200 times the percentage of paedophiles in the secular population. Can you pick the real number of those sexually abused by Catholic clergy in Australia? 15,227 or 110,007 or 145,549 or 62,243 or 130,137 or 33,681? ANSWER: 130,137 Now ask me about Pastor Chris again. |
okpurukata: Jesus himself told us that the greatest commandment is Love. How many times did he say your brother should offend you before you revenge? Answer by yourself. But what do your pastor preach, fire fire fire fire fire, bind bind bind. Bind. Fire fire fire fire fire fire .... MOST OF THE SO CALLED BIBLE BELIEVING CHURCHES DO NOT PREACH LOVE. There is no love for your neighbor as long as he is not worshipping in your church. I visited Rome last year and guess my biggest surprise?most of the people doing business at the Vatican are Muslims, Hindi, Budhists. I askedWHY? Our vatican guide said, in the words of the pope, The body of Christ ( the church) is for all people. Can that happen at Winners? Redemption camp? Even at Jehovah witness camp? The answer is NEVER.Lady when you want to go deep and acquire knowledge pls pls pls do let me know and by the grace of God you shall receive knowledge. Please stop trying too hard to start an argument which you cannot defend. You are only beating the air. |
okpurukata: @forevergod3: what do you have to say about the latest divorce of Pastor Chris Okotie and his injunction that it shall not be discussed? Bible knowing and believing churches i indeed. BY THEIR FRUITS W E SHALL KNOW THEM. My brother God cannot be mocked.My response to your above statement is what Jesus said in John 10:27 "My sheep hear my voice, I know them and they follow me". I will try to be the better person by not asking you a question in return. Otherwise I would have asked about what you thought about the rampant cases of pedophilia among catholic priests and members of the roman catholic order. And if you want instances i have so so many ranging from 1960 to 2011. Do you know that statistics state that 10% of Catholic priests were pedo..philes and still counting, 20 to 200 times more than general population. The number of pedo..phile priests found so far in the U.S. Catholic Church is "extrapolated" to be as high as 10,969 according to Bishop Accountabillity.org, and they are still counting. |
okpurukata: The so called bible believing churches are busy squeezing their congregation for money and fighting openly over headship of their churches. Majority are pure business men. They are in it for what they will get, not to serve God or humanity. The church just beside my house collects all kinds of offering, seed offering, testimony offering, consultancy, tithe, general offering. At times when they call for offerings no one gets up again. Meanwhile the woman owner has suddenly grown in status. |
For those who are wondering how i could possibly know so much. I give the glory to God as a bible scholar and historian and also a bible school faithful I have access to these information. |
[b]Does Catholicism still teach that it is the one true Church founded by Christ? Many think not, but there is no denying the church's official position: "This is the sole Church of Christ, which in the Creed we profess to be one, holy, catholic and apostolic." Pg. 214, #811 Referring to the Catholic church, the Catechism pronounces: "In fact, in this one and only Church of God..." Pg. 216, #817 "First, the Church is catholic because Christ is present in her. Where there is Christ Jesus, there is the Catholic Church." Pg. 220, #830 This "one true church" doctrine can be traced to one verse of Scripture, which, when compared with other Scriptures, is found not to teach this doctrine at all. When Jesus asked his disciples who He was, Peter responded: "Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God. Matthew 16:16" Then Jesus answered Peter: "... thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it." Matthew 16:18 Catholicism contends that the Lord was referring to Peter as the rock, and has since built the entire Catholic religion upon that premise. But all other pertinent Scriptures declare that Jesus was referring to Himself as the rock, not Peter: "... for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ." 1 Corinthians 10:4 Jesus is not only the rock, He is the chief cornerstone of the church: "And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone;" Ephesians 2:20 Back in the Old Testament, it was prophesied that Jesus, whom men rejected, would become the cornerstone of the church: "The stone which the builders refused is become the head stone of the corner." Psalm 118:22 Even Peter, allegedly the first pope, confesses that Jesus Christ is the cornerstone of the church: "...by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth... This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner." Acts 4:10-11 "... the stone which the builders disallowed, the same is made the head of the corner," 1 Peter 2:7 According to Scriptures, Peter is NOT the rock: "For who is God save the LORD? or who is a rock save our God?" Psalm 18:31 "... I will publish the name of the LORD: ascribe ye greatness unto our God. He is the Rock..." Deuteronomy 32:3-4 "Truly my soul waiteth upon God... He only is my rock..." Psalm 62:1-2 "But the LORD is my defence; and my God is the rock of my refuge." Psalm 94:22 Who is the head of the church Despite all these Scriptures, Catholicism still claims that Peter was the rock and his successors are the head of the church: "The sole Church of Christ (is that) which our Savior, after his Resurrection, entrusted to Peter's pastoral care, commissioning him and the other apostles to extend and rule it... This Church, constituted and organized as a society in the present world, subsists in (subsistit in) the Catholic Church, which is governed by the successors of Peter and by the bishops in communion with him." Pg. 215, #816 But the Bible declares that Jesus Christ, not Peter or his successors, is the head of the church: "And he (Christ) is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he (Christ) might have the preeminence." Colossians 1:18 "And hath put all things under his feet, and gave him (Christ) to be the head over all things to the church," Ephesians 1:22 "But speaking the truth in love, may grow up into him in all things, which is the head, even Christ:" Ephesians 4:15 The biblical "church" When the Bible uses the words "the church," it always refers to all those who trust in Jesus Christ alone for salvation, not just to members of the Catholic church: "Unto the church of God which is at Corinth, to them that are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, with all that in every place call upon the name of Jesus Christ our Lord..." 1 Corinthians 1:2 The Apostle Paul wrote: "Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;" Ephesians 5:25 Paul was not a Catholic, yet he knew that Christ loved him and died for him. Certainly, no one would dare say that Paul was not a Christian because he was not a Catholic. Would anyone suggest that God only loves Catholics?... or that He only died for Catholics? Such would be the case if the Catholic church was the only church. Paul also proclaimed: "And walk in love, as Christ also hath loved us, and hath given himself for us..." Ephesians 5:2 Can non-Catholics be Christians? As the "one true church," Catholicism claims the right to determine who is or is not a Christian: "All who have been justified by faith in Baptism are incorporated into Christ; they therefore have a right to be called Christians, and with good reason are accepted as brothers in the Lord by the children of the Catholic Church." Pg 216, #818 In other words, if you have not been baptized into the Catholic church, you are not a Christian. These are not my words, but the words of the official Catholic Catechism. But according to Scripture, it doesn't matter if the Catholic church has accepted you or not. If your faith is in Jesus Christ alone, then He has already accepted you: "To the praise of the glory of his grace, wherein he (Jesus) hath made us accepted in the beloved." Ephesians 1:6 Conclusion At this point, you must make a few decisions: Is Peter really the rock? The Catechism says he is, but God's Word says he is not. Is the Catholic church the one true church? The Catechism says yes, but the Bible says no. Do you really believe that all non-Catholics will burn in hell? Once again, the answers to each of these questions will be determined by which you choose to believe... the traditions of men, or God's Word. Jesus asked the Pharisees a question which all Roman Catholics should ponder: "Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition?" Matthew 15:3[/b] |
@Piro4rl Catholicism teaches that it has the power and authority to forgive people's sins. Here are a few quotes from the Catechism. (Please note that whenever the Catechism mentions the "Church," it is referring to the "Roman Catholic church" :"There is no offense, however serious, that the Church cannot forgive." "By Christ's will, the Church possesses the power to forgive the sins of the baptized..." "The Church, who through the bishop and his priests forgives sins in the name of Jesus Christ..." Does the Catholic church have power to forgive sins? Let's see what the Scriptures say: "Why doth this man thus speak blasphemies? who can forgive sins but God only?" Mark 2:7 "And be ye kind one to another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, even as God for Christ's sake hath forgiven you." Ephesians 4:32 According to Scripture, God wants His children to come straight to Him for forgiveness of sins, not to a church: "Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need." Hebrews 4:16 This verse loudly proclaims that forgiveness of sins comes from God's throne, not from a church. Still, Catholicism teaches a contrary doctrine: "Indeed bishops and priests, by virtue of the sacrament of Holy Orders, have the power to forgive all sins 'in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.' "The Church must be able to forgive all penitents their offenses, even if they should sin until the last moment of their lives." However, this man-made doctrine contradicts God' s written Word. Many Bible characters freely approached God's throne for forgiveness of sins. The psalmist went straight to God: "I acknowledged my sin unto thee... I said, I will confess my transgressions unto the LORD; and thou forgavest the iniquity of my sin..." Psalm 32:5 King David went directly to God to ask forgiveness for his sins: "Look upon mine affliction and my pain; and forgive all my sins." Psalm 25:18 In Psalm 51, David asks God for forgiveness again: "Wash me thoroughly from mine iniquity, and cleanse me from my sin. Against thee, thee only, have I sinned, and done this evil in thy sight..." Psalm 51:2,4 King Solomon was also aware that he and all the children of Israel could go straight to God to receive forgiveness for their sins: "Hearken therefore unto the supplications of thy servant, and of thy people Israel, which they shall make toward this place: hear thou from thy dwelling place, even from heaven; and when thou hearest, forgive." 2 Chronicles 6:21 God tells people to come to Him for forgiveness: "If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land." 2 Chronicles 7:14 God never requires anyone to go through a church to receive forgiveness for their sins. "For thou, Lord, art good, and ready to forgive; and plenteous in mercy unto all them that call upon thee." Psalm 86:5 "... if any man have a quarrel against any: even as Christ forgave you, so also do ye." Colossians 3:13 Why then would the Catholic church insist that forgiveness of sins is only available through her? The following Catechism quote provides the answer: " Were there no forgiveness of sins in the Church, there would be no hope of life to come or eternal liberation. Let us thank God who has given his Church such a gift." Rather than looking to Jesus for forgiveness of sins and eternal life, Roman Catholics are taught that their sins can only be forgiven through the Catholic church. Whether intentional or not, this doctrine keeps people in bondage to the Catholic church. Conclusion Once again, God' s Word stands on one side, while the traditions of men stand on the other. God says He alone forgives sins, while Catholic tradition contends that the Catholic church has the power to forgive sins. Which side will you choose? "Bless the LORD, O my soul, and forget not all his benefits: Who forgiveth all thine iniquities..." Psalm 103:2-3 |
A-ZeD:I will attempt to answer your question using the scriptures themselves; see below "Now concerning the matters about which you wrote. It is well for a man not to touch a woman. But because of the temptation to immorality, each man should have his own wife and each woman her own husband. The husband should give to his wife her conjugal rights, and likewise the wife to her husband. For the wife does not rule over her own body, but the husband does; likewise the husband does not rule over his own body, but the wife does. Do not refuse one another except perhaps by agreement for a season, that you may devote yourselves to prayer; but then come together again, lest Satan tempt you through lack of self-control. I say this by way of concession, not of command. wish that all were as I myself am. But each has his own special gift from God, one of one kind and one of another." (1 Corinthians 7:1-7 ) "But each has his own special gift from God, one of one kind and one of another" The apostle Paul (and other key figures among God's people, including Elijah, John the Baptist and Jesus Christ) was not married (some are of the opinion that Paul may have been a widower), but Paul taught neither for, or against, marriage. What Paul taught regarding marriage was a matter of what was best for an individual's righteous life. "To the unmarried and the widows I say that it is well for them to remain single as I do. But if they cannot exercise self-control, they should marry. For it is better to marry than to be aflame with passion." (1 Corinthians 7:8-9 ) Paul was not absolute in his teaching, of The Lord's teaching ("I give charge, not I but the Lord" , about separation and divorce, but he did make a distinction between marriage in general ("To the married I give charge" and a marriage that involves a believer and an unbeliever ("if the unbelieving partner desires to separate, let it be so; in such a case the brother or sister is not bound" ."To the married I give charge, not I but the Lord, that the wife should not separate from her husband but if she does, let her remain single or else be reconciled to her husband - and that the husband should not divorce his wife. To the rest I say, not the Lord, that if any brother has a wife who is an unbeliever, and she consents to live with him, he should not divorce her. If any woman has a husband who is an unbeliever, and he consents to live with her, she should not divorce him. For the unbelieving husband is consecrated through his wife, and the unbelieving wife is consecrated through her husband. Otherwise, your children would be unclean, but as it is they are holy. But if the unbelieving partner desires to separate, let it be so; in such a case the brother or sister is not bound. For God has called us to peace. Wife, how do you know whether you will save your husband? Husband, how do you know whether you will save your wife?" (1 Corinthians 7:10-16 ) Paul's primary focus was "let every one lead the life which the Lord has assigned to him, and in which God has called him." Does that mean that, for example, Paul remained single because he was single when he was called, while Peter was married to a "believing" wife because Peter was married (we know that Peter was married at his calling because Jesus cured Peter's mother-in-law of a fever i.e. Luke 4:38-39) when he was called? Perhaps, but as Paul explains further, his, or Peter's, or anyone else's, circumstances and choices do not apply to everyone. It depends on the calling, the mission. "Only, let every one lead the life which the Lord has assigned to him, and in which God has called him. This is my rule in all the churches." (1 Corinthians 7:17 ) But what did he mean by that? "Was any one at the time of his call already circumcised? Let him not seek to remove the marks of circumcision. Was any one at the time of his call uncircumcised? Let him not seek circumcision. For neither circumcision counts for anything nor uncircumcision, but keeping the Commandments of God. Every one should remain in the state in which he was called. Were you a slave when called? Never mind. But if you can gain your freedom, avail yourself of the opportunity. For he who was called in the Lord as a slave is a freedman of the Lord. Likewise he who was free when called is a slave of Christ. You were bought with a price; do not become slaves of men. So, brethren, in whatever state each was called, there let him remain with God. Now concerning the unmarried, I have no command of the Lord, but I give my opinion as one who by the Lord's mercy is trustworthy. I think that in view of the present distress it is well for a person to remain as he is. Are you bound to a wife? Do not seek to be free. Are you free from a wife? Do not seek marriage. But if you marry, you do not sin, and if a girl marries she does not sin. Yet those who marry will have worldly troubles, and I would spare you that." (1 Corinthians 7:18-28 ) Paul's summary? Marry or remain single, not as one state being better than the other, for everyone, but as a matter if whichever makes an individual more productive to their calling in this life. Some are more effective Christians married, while others are more effective Christians single. "I mean, brethren, the appointed time has grown very short [see Could Christ Return Tonight?]; from now on, let those who have wives live as though they had none, and those who mourn as though they were not mourning, and those who rejoice as though they were not rejoicing, and those who buy as though they had no goods, and those who deal with the world as though they had no dealings with it. For the form of this world is passing away. I want you to be free from anxieties. The unmarried man is anxious about the affairs of the Lord, how to please the Lord; but the married man is anxious about worldly affairs, how to please his wife, and his interests are divided. And the unmarried woman or girl is anxious about the affairs of the Lord, how to be holy in body and spirit; but the married woman is anxious about worldly affairs, how to please her husband. I say this for your own benefit, not to lay any restraint upon you, but to promote good order and to secure your undivided devotion to the Lord. If any one thinks that he is not behaving properly toward his betrothed, if his passions are strong, and it has to be, let him do as he wishes: let them marry - it is no sin. But whoever is firmly established in his heart, being under no necessity but having his desire under control, and has determined this in his heart, to keep her as his betrothed, he will do well. So that he who marries his betrothed does well; and he who refrains from marriage will do better. A wife is bound to her husband as long as he lives. If the husband dies, she is free to be married to whom she wishes, only in the Lord. But in my judgment she is happier if she remains as she is. And I think that I have the Spirit of God." (1 Corinthians 7:29-40 ) |
egbenduru: FOREVERGOD3Ha! I laugh in tongues! Jesus being a Nazarene spoke 2 languages Aramaic and Hebrew and FYI if you have ever owned a bible concordance with Greek and Hebrew Lexicon then you would be able to have a discussion with me along biblical lines because actual true words used in their right context are interpreted into modern day english from hebrew or greek or even aramaic so you would understand. The english Language is not even as complete or detailed as the hebrew language as sometimes we struggle to find the right words. For example; The word FIRM in greek is called "stako" which means stand firm or be steadfast while in Hebrew FIRM is called "gabar" which actually can have several different meaning depending on the context. The basic meaning is, "be strong" or "prevail", "mighty" I strongly suggest you go get yourself a proper concordance. I would gladly recommend Strongs Concordance to you. |
bad as e bad ogoro no dey jump go back = translation " bad as e bad frog no dey jump backward |
Anyigala: "Have you heard of the Harlot church that rides the beast ?"The carnal mind can never comprehend the things of the spirit. i do sincerely wish you and i could have a face to face argument on this matter but alas we can't. You need help. A reprobate mind isnt something i can do anything about. Only God can help you. |
FATHER IN HEAVEN I BOW MY KNEES BEFORE YOU AND PRAY AT THIS HOUR THAT ALL THOSE WHO STAND IN THE WAY OF TRUTH AND NEVER SPEAK UP TO THE DEFENSE OF THE WEAK IN ACCORDANCE WITH YOUR DIVINE LAW OF SOWING AND REAPING FOUND IN THE BOOK OF GALATIANS CHAPTER 6 VERSE 7, LET SAME BE METED OUT TO THEM IN JESUS NAME! AMEN. YOU SAID IN YOUR WORD IN ISAIAH 54 VERSE 15 THAT THEY SHALL SURELY GATHER BUT NOT BY YOU AND THAT WHOSOEVER SHALL GATHER AGAINST YOUR OWN SHALL FALL FOR OUR SAKE, I DECREE IT SO IN JESUS NAME! AMEN. YOU DECLARED IN ISAIAH 31 VERSE 3 THAT NOW THE EGYPTIANS ARE MEN AND NOT GOD AND THEIR HORSES FLESH AND NOT SPIRIT, WHEN THE LORD SHALL STRETCH OUT HIS HAND BOTH HE THAT HELPS SHALL FALL AND HE THAT IS HELPED SHALL FALL DOWN AND THEY ALL SHALL FAIL TOGETHER. I DECREE IT SO IN JESUS NAME! AMEN. ALL THOSE WHO DENY THE TRUTH AND ALWAYS SPEAK AGAINST IT MAY YOUR WRATH BE VISITED UPON THEM UNTO REPENTANCE IN JESUS NAME! AMEN. RENO OMOKRI AND JMAINE I HAVE YOU IN MY CROSS-HAIRS. |
jmaine: And how many light years will it take any of your household to equal GEJ achievement ? . . . .AHH NOW WE KNOW ITS ALL ABOUT GEJ AND NOT YOU GUYS. MAY YOUR TONGUES CLEAVE TO THE CLEFT OF YOUR MOUTH IF YOU NEVER SEE REASON WHY YOU NEED TO SPEAK THE TRUTH. |
Dee mic: @poster i dnt know wht u intend to achieve wit dis post? Wht u should b concerned wit is making sure u make heaven criticism and trying to understand y some churches do wht dey do wont open d door of heaven so i will advice all of u claiming to know d bible to make sure it will lead u to christ on dat day, the most important is do d right thing. Thank you.And what to you is the right thing. Isnt the right thing telling the truth? isnt the right thing saving your brother or sister who is lost? isnt the right thing opening the eyes of the blind [both physical and spiritual]? Please i pray you kindly tell me what is your idea of "do the right thing" Or perhaps your idea of doing the right thing is for everyone to do what he or she feels is right and not what God says is right. |
Anyigala: To be truly a “bible church” (notice no one ever says "food restaurant", "book library", "exercise gymnasium", or "car highway"!), the church would have to adhere to everything that is in the New Testament. Accordingly, here is a checklist of things that are in the New Testament that all bible churches should answer yes to:You know absolutely nothing about the faith you profess. Try and search out the history of your "catholic church" and maybe you just might know what to say and where you belong. |
Here is a short history of the Bible. 1. Old Testament The Old Testament was written by Moses, David and Solomon, prophets, seers and kings. There was no "church" of any kind to claim responsibility for it. God inspired individuals to bring God's word to the people. The Old Testament is the recorded revelation of God up until about 400 BC. 2. The Inter-Testamental Period The time between about 400 BC and about 5 BC is usually called the Years of Prophetic Silence. This is because God created a process that lasted 400 years to create a world climate ready for the coming of the promised Messiah. There was no "church" at this time, either. But there was the new creation of the "synagogue," since the Jewish people needed to worship God and did not have the Temple when they were in exile. When many came back 400-500 BC, they already had functional synagogues; and even though the Temple was being rebuilt by those returning from exile, the synagogue idea remained and more were built. This was the beginning of the "congregation" or "church" as we have it today. But there was no Scripture being written during this period. That was yet to come after one came "in the spirit and power of Elias" (Luke 1:17). 3. The Time of Christ It is likely that Matthew (Levi) the tax collector and later disciple of Jesus took notes of what happened during Jesus' ministry. However, it is also true that were God in the flesh living among you, His words would burn into your soul. I am sure, as the apostles clearly recollected as they wrote the New Testament (2 Peter 1:16-21; 1 John 1:1-3; 4:14), they could not escape the image and words of Jesus Christ, God the Son and Son of God, when He spoke into their hearts (Luke 9:44; 24:32). But it wasn't a "church" that made them write. 2 Timothy 3:16-17 16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 17 That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works. And 2 Peter 1:19-21 19 We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye take heed, as unto a light that shineth in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the day star arise in your hearts: 20 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation. 21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost. God the Holy Spirit inspired them, perfectly and accurately, to write the words of God for the church. The church did not "inspire" anything. 4. The Church Age When the apostles wrote their letters, the congregations received them. They read them. They spread them. They copied them for other brethren in Christ Jesus. And they recognized their authority in the Christian's life. So the Scriptures were produced by men of God, not by "the church." But they were produced FOR the church. The last book of the Bible was Revelation, written about 96 AD, just before the apostle John died around 100 AD. After the apostles died, the churches continued to collect the letters they did not have, to read them and understand the authority under God by which they wrote. But no one else shared that place. There is an "epistle of Barnabas" (which bears no proof it was written by Barnabas), which many think was penned in the first century. But the difference between its message of salvation and of the apostolic writings is too easy to see. If you believe the Scriptures, you cannot believe the so-called "epistle of Barnabas." There are the writings of Polycarp, disciple of John (when John was very aged). There are writings of Clement and others. But those are all writings of Christians. Just Christians. Some were even martyrs, but their writings depended on the Scriptures--they were not Scripture themselves. Anyone who would base their faith on them would have a horrid foundation, just as if there were "Lutherans" today, learning of God's word only what they find in Martin Luther's writings. Interesting writing, at times "inspirational" writing, fine. Inspired? Not a chance. The Roman Catholic church has had only one aim from its earliest, pagan and political origins: To destroy the true Christians, and to destroy their Bible. That is why they substituted the corrupt Alexandrian perversions of scripture, instead of using the preserved, prophetic and apostolic Words of God as found in Antioch of Syria, where "the disciples were first called Christians" (Acts 11:26). That is why they also added the Alexandrian writings we now call "Apocrypha" to their perverted bibles. That is why they used their Jesuits to infiltrate the Protestant Seminaries, Colleges and Bible Schools. Their Jesuits became the "teachers" and planted seeds of doubt in the Christians' minds. These doubt-ridden Christians then taught at other colleges and schools. All the while they planted that same seed of doubt of God's word in their students. The stage was set: Once people no longer believed in God's Preserved Words, which we find perfectly presented in the King James Bible, they were ripe for destruction. Now, 120 years after the switch from God's Word to devil's lies (the King James abandoned for the Alexandrian texts), while pretending to "improve" our copies of God's words, they really set up the abandonment of God's words. Now almost every Bible in the English-speaking world (and most other languages) is just another re-translation of the Alexandrian polluted stream. Another way to view it is that the Scriptures as we find them preserved in the King James is like God's fountain ... Jeremiah 2:13 13 For my people have committed two evils; they have forsaken me the fountain of living waters, and hewed them out cisterns, broken cisterns, that can hold no water. And that's the point: The bible spewed out by the Catholic church, which now almost all Protestants and other Christians use, ... simply doesn't hold water. |
chukwudi44: Practically all precepts of the Roman Catholic religion contradict the Bible repeatedly. The Bible is the word of God. In this article, we are going to examine a few Roman Catholic doctrines and compare them with the Bible. The Roman Catholic church is the largest cult in the world and most preachers will not openly say so because it is so large. For Catholics who read this, please remember this: the person that tells you the truth is the one that cares. If you will only believe the holy scriptures--the Bible--and nothing else, you can be released from deception today. JuThe catholic church never decided the books of the bible. If the Bible is a Catholic book, why does it nowhere mention the Catholic Church? Why is there no mention of a pope, a cardinal, an archbishop, a parish priest, a nun, or a member of any other Catholic order? If the Bible is a Catholic book, why is auricular confession, indulgences, prayers to the saints, adoration of Mary, veneration of relics and images, and many other rites and ceremonies of the Catholic Church, left out of it? If the Bible is a Catholic book, how can Catholics account for the passage, "A bishop then, must be blameless, married but once, reserved, prudent, of good conduct, hospitable, a teacher...He should rule well his own household, keeping his children under control and perfectly respectful. For if a man cannot rule his own household, how is he to take care of the church of God?" (1 Tim. 3:2, 4-5). The Catholic Church does not allow a bishop to marry, while the Bible says "he must be married." In addition to the above, Catholics often boast that the Bible was written by Catholics, e.g., "All the books of the New Testament were written by Catholics." When we consider the word "catholic" as meaning "universal," we readily admit that the writers were "catholic" in that sense; they were members of the church universal--the church of Christ which is described in the New Testament Scriptures (Col. 1:18; Rom. 16:16). However, we firmly deny that the writers of the New Testament were members of the Roman Catholic Church as we know it today. The Roman Catholic Church was not fully developed until several hundred years after the New Testament was written. It is not the same institution as disclosed in the New Testament. The New Testament books were written by members of the Lord's church, but they are not its author. God Himself is the author of the New Testament. The Catholic officials above claim that without the Catholic Church there would be no Bible; they argue that mankind can accept the Scriptures only on the basis of the Catholic Church which gathered the books and determined which were inspired. Surely the Catholic Church cannot claim that it gave us the Old Testament Scriptures. The Old Testament came through the Jews (God's chosen people of old) who had the holy oracles entrusted to them. Paul said, "What advantage then remains to the Jew, or what is the use of circumcision? Much in every respect. First, indeed, because the oracles of God were entrusted to them." (Rom. 3:1-2; see also Rom. 9:4-5; Acts 7:38 ). The Old Testament books were gathered into one volume and were translated from Hebrew into Greek long before Christ came to earth. The Septuagint Version was translated by seventy scholars at Alexandria, Egypt around the year 227 B.C., and this was the version Christ and His apostles used. Christ did not tell the people, as Catholics do today, that they could accept the Scriptures only on the basis of the authority of those who gathered them and declared them to be inspired. He urged the people of His day to follow the Old Testament Scriptures as the infallible guide, not because man or any group of men has sanctioned them as such, but because they came from God. Furthermore, He understood that God-fearing men and women would be able to discern by evidence (external and internal) which books were of God and which were not; thus, He never raised questions and doubts concerning the gathering of the inspired books. |
egbenduru: I think ignorance is a deadly disease,one should never discuss what he lacks knowledge and information on.i am shocked at your write up here. clearly shows you are misguided and have no knowledge of the word of God. I would have written more than what i wrote in my previous post but i would stir the hornets nest if i do. Because catholics are just to stone deaf to listen just like muslims. It can only take God to touch you guys. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 (of 34 pages)
: