Unlike what is being purported by premium times as Atiku's server report,

Below is the full report as showcased in the whistleblowing website https://www.factsdontlieng.com/

Premium times are either to lazy or just being mischievous.

the report from premium times is a figment of their wild imagination

And sensible Nigerians are suppose to trust your website n pictures ?! How come you can not show INEC web page to confirm you got your data from there or you have no idea any lunatic can wake up create a spreadsheet with figures and every other BS desirable to him n claim that as fact just because he successfully uploaded such online ?!

shachris02:
Unlike what is being purported by premium times as Atiku's server report,

Below is the full report as showcased in the whistleblowing website https://www.factsdontlieng.com/

Premium times are either to lazy or just being mischievous.

Are you minding them

Why you dey share your laptop with us?

Lol

THIS IS FROM PDP GUYS WHO LATER ADDED THE TOTAL OF INEC RESULTS TO THE ONE ATIKU GOT FROM INEC SEVER.

This is a poor work of a computer illiterate

I can easily do the same with the excel spreadsheets in my laptop.

Prompto:
And sensible Nigerians are suppose to trust your website n pictures ?! How come you can not show INEC web page to confirm you got your data from there or you have no idea any lunatic can wake up create a spreadsheet with figures and every other BS desirable to him n claim that as fact just because he successfully uploaded such online ?!

shutup, read PDP's submission at the court, the website was specifically stated.

it's not my website, Z. Check vanguards report below and look at bolded.

ABUJA – The Presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, Atiku Abubakar, has alleged that the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, had at various stages of the February 23 presidential election, unlawful allocated votes to President Muhammadu Buhari. Buhari and Atiku Atiku who made the allegation in the petition he lodged before the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal sitting in Abuja, said he would adduce oral and documentary evidence to show that results of the election as announced by INEC, especially the votes credited to President Buhari, did not represent the lawful valid votes cast. He alleged that in some states, INEC, deducted lawful votes that accrued to him, in its bid to ensure that Buhari was returned back to office. Both Atiku and the PDP said they would call evidence of statisticians, forensic examiners and finger-print experts at the hearing of the petition to establish that the scores credited to Buhari were not the product of actual votes validly cast at the polling units.

“The Petitioners plead and shall rely on electronic video recordings, newspaper reports, photographs and photographic images of several infractions of the electoral process by the Respondents”, they added. Specifically, the petitioners serialised results that were recorded from each state of the federation in order to prove that the alleged fraudulent allocation of votes to Buhari and the All Progressives Congress, APC, took place at the polling units, the ward collating centres, local government collating centres and the State collating centres. Atiku contended that proper collation and summation of the presidential election results would show that contrary to what INEC declared, he garnered a total of 18,356,732 votes, ahead of Buhari who he said got a total of 16,741,430 votes. “The Petitioners shall rely on the evidence of Statisticians, Forensic Examiners and other Experts, detailing the data analysis on the votes at all levels of collation, from the polling units to the final return”, he added.

“The Petitioners state that Smart Card Readers deployed by the 1st Respondent, in addition to accreditation, equally transmitted electronically the results of voting from polling units directly to the server of the 1st Respondent. The Presiding Officers of the 1st Respondent directly inputted the results from the polling units at the end of voting and transmitted directly to the server, in addition to manually taking the Form EC8As to the Wards for collation. The 1st Respondent is hereby given notice to produce the records of results from each polling unit uploaded and transmitted electronically by officials of the 1st Respondent through smart card readers to the 1st Respondent’s Servers. Election at six polling units in Ambode’s home town cancelled

“The Petitioners plead and rely on the 1st Respondent’s Manual Technologies 2019, and notice is hereby given to the 1st Respondent to produce same at the trial. The 1st Respondent’s agents at the polling units used the Smart Card Reader for electronic collation and transmission of results. The Petitioners plead and shall rely on and play at the trial, the video demonstration by the 1st Respondent of the deployment of Smart Card Reader for authentication of accreditation and for transmission of data. “The Petitioners hereby plead and rely upon the extract of data as contained on the 1st Respondent’s servers as at 25th February 2019, notice to produce whereof is hereby given to the 1st Respondent. The Petitioners also will rely on the data on the 1st Respondent’s central server between 25th February 2019 and 8th March 2019 and hereby also give notice to produce same before this Honourable Court.

“The Petitioners hereby plead the electronic data on the servers of the 1st Respondent and shall at the trial give evidence of the source of the data analysis and data material, including the website: www.factsdontlieng.com. “The 1st Respondent had on the day of election published the total number of registered voters in the entire Country as 84,004,084. Subsequently, the same 1st Respondent published a different figure of 82,344,107 as registered voters, leading to an unexplained difference of 1,659,977 registered voters. The 1st Respondent equally published the number of permanent voter’s cards (PVC) collected for the purpose of the presidential election as 72,775,502. “The Petitioners state that whereas the actual number of voters accredited at the election was 35,098,162, the 1st Respondent wrongly suppressed and/or reduced the number of accredited voters to 29,394,209 to the detriment of the Petitioners.

“The 1st Respondent had by its Regulations and Guidelines for the Conduct of Elections, 2019 made pursuant to the Electoral Act, 2010 (as amended) provided for the mandatory use of card readers for the said election. The 1st Respondent by its press release on smart card readers issued in February 2019 and signed by its National Commissioner, Barrister Festus Okoye, emphasised and reiterated that “The use of the Smart Card Reader is NOT ONLY MANDATORY but its deliberate non-use attracts the sanction of possible prosecution of erring officials in accordance with the INEC Regulations and Guidelines for the conduct of elections. “This is in addition to the voiding of any result emanating from such units or areas as was done in the Presidential and National Assembly elections of February 23, 2019.” By this stated position of the 1st Respondent, all accreditation not done by smart card reader in the presidential election was and remain void.

“The Petitioners state and contend that the 2nd Respondent was not duly elected by majority of lawful votes cast at the election; and that from the data on each State of the Federation and the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, in the 1st Respondent’s server, the 1st Petitioner, as opposed to the 2nd Respondent, scored majority of lawful votes cast at the election. “Wherefore, the Petitioners pray jointly and severally against the Respondents as follows:- “That it may be determined that the 2nd Respondent (Buhari) was not duly elected by a majority of lawful votes cast in the said election and therefore the declaration and return of the 2nd Respondent by the 1st Respondent as the President of Nigeria is unlawful, undue, null, void and of no effect.

“That it may be determined that the 1st Petitioner (Atiku) was duly and validly elected and ought to be returned as President of Nigeria, having polled the highest number of lawful votes cast at the election to the office of the President of Nigeria held on 23rd February 2019 and having satisfied the constitutional requirements for the said election. 2019: INEC will use smart card readers – Chairman “An order directing the 1st Respondent to issue Certificate of Return to the 1st Petitioner as the duly elected President of Nigeria. “That it may be determined that the 2nd Respondent was at the time of the election not qualified to contest the said election. “That it may be determined that the 2nd Respondent submitted to the Commission affidavit containing false information of a fundamental nature in aid of his qualification for the said election”. In the alternative, he prayed: “That the election to the office of the President of Nigeria held on 23rd February 2019 be nullified and a fresh election ordered”.

Read more at: https://www.vanguardngr.com/2019/03/presidential-poll-inec-credited-invalid-votes-to-buhari-atiku-tells-tribunal/

Iamgrey5:
Lol

THIS IS FROM PDP GUYS WHO LATER ADDED THE TOTAL OF INEC RESULTS TO THE ONE ATIKU GOT FROM INEC SEVER.

This is a poor work of a computer iilerrate

I can easily do the same with with the excel spreadsheets in my laptop.

This is directly from the whistleblowing website, https://www.factsdontlieng.com/

Why don't you look it up? The website was referenced by Atiku in his submission to the court. Check the vanguard report above.

shachris02:


This is directly from the whistleblowing website, https://www.factsdontlieng.com/

Why don't you look it up? The website was referenced by Atiku in his submission to the court. Check the vanguard report above.

This is directly from a poorly designed website that was launched last week when the results was" released" to the media.

The poorly informed people that designed it only added the results inec declared to the new results that emerged.

I have argued on this subject matter last week.

Check out the thread below

https://www.nairaland.com/5090815/analyzing-atikus-purported-authentic-results#76854338

shachris02:


This is directly from the whistleblowing website, https://www.factsdontlieng.com/

Why don't you look it up? The website was referenced by Atiku in his submission to the court. Check the vanguard report above.

Lol..whistleblowing website created by PDP idiots.

Iamgrey5:
This is directly from a poorly designed website that was launched last week when the results was" released" to the media.

The poorly informed people that designed it only added the results inec declared to the new results that emerged.

I have argued on this subject matter last week.

Baba that website with all the proof that's in it has been tendered as evidence to the court, poorly developed or not. It\s left for INEC and your APC to disprove it and not some random zombies ranting trash online.

If you are smart enough, you'd know that INEC is already in panic mode due to the concrete evidence that's been released from that website.

Oblang:


Lol..whistleblowing website created by PDP idiots.

Guy all evidence contained in that website has been shared with the prosecutor.

PDP know say if they push all these evidence to an online site or social media, APC would push the site owners to delete the content.

This website is standing gidigba and its content can never be tampered with.

Don't worry, the jury would be reviewing the website in court.


INEC do not even know what they are into. I would be very surprised if Buhari wins the case.

shachris02:


Baba that website with all the proof that's in it has been tendered as evidence to the court, poorly developed or not. It\s left for INEC and your APC to disprove it and not some random zombies ranting trash online.

If you are smart enough, you'd know that INEC is already in panic mode due to the concrete evidence that's been released from that website.

uncle it is clearly stated in the vangurd website that the petitioner claimed that Atiku garnered a total of 18,356,732 votes, ahead of Buhari who he said got a total of 16,741,430 votes.

“The Petitioners state that whereas the actual number of voters accredited at the election was 35,098,162, the 1st Respondent wrongly suppressed and/or reduced the number of accredited voters to 29,394,209 to the detriment of the Petitioners. That is the total votes of APC &PDP with no room for other parties like the premium times also alleged

https://www.vanguardngr.com/2019/03/presidential-poll-inec-credited-invalid-votes-to-buhari-atiku-tells-tribunal/

However, your fake website said 37 million accredited votes, can you now spot the difference

shachris02:


Guy all evidence contained in that website has been shared with the prosecutor.

PDP know say if they push all these evidence to an online site or social media, APC would push the site owners to delete the content.

This website is standing gidigba and its content can never be tampered with.

Don't worry, the jury would be reviewing the website in court.


INEC do not even know what they are into. I would be very surprised if Buhari wins the case.

Exactly let INEC disprove the evidence not some random Apc minions on social media.

Iamgrey5:
uncle it is clearly stated in the vangurd website that the petitioner claimed that Atiku garnered a total of 18,356,732 votes, ahead of Buhari who he said got a total of 16,741,430 votes.

“The Petitioners state that whereas the actual number of voters accredited at the election was 35,098,162, the 1st Respondent wrongly suppressed and/or reduced the number of accredited voters to 29,394,209 to the detriment of the Petitioners. That is the total votes of APC &PDP with no room for other parties like the premium times also alleged

https://www.vanguardngr.com/2019/03/presidential-poll-inec-credited-invalid-votes-to-buhari-atiku-tells-tribunal/

However, your fake website said 37 million accredited votes, can you now spot the difference

Jjust like CjN Onnneghen had 55 houses and millions of dollars in his accounts. Any press release right Now is doubtful wait For the tribunal.

tuniski:


Jjust like CjN Onnneghen had 55 houses and millions of dollars in his accounts. Any press release right Now is doubtful wait For the tribunal.

Bro don't be deliberately mischievious

This is an extract of a suit against inec and APC by the PDP published by most national dallies

This isn't a rumor like onnegen's case

Iamgrey5:
Bro don't be deliberately mischievious

This is an extract of a suit against inec and APC by the PDP published by most national dallies

This isn't a rumor like onnegen's case

what are the facts of the matter.

Were votes deducted from the petitioner?

Were votes added to Buhari.

Forget the number and face the facts of the matter.

Iamgrey5:
uncle it is clearly stated in the vangurd website that the petitioner claimed that Atiku garnered a total of 18,356,732 votes, ahead of Buhari who he said got a total of 16,741,430 votes.

“The Petitioners state that whereas the actual number of voters accredited at the election was 35,098,162, the 1st Respondent wrongly suppressed and/or reduced the number of accredited voters to 29,394,209 to the detriment of the Petitioners. That is the total votes of APC &PDP with no room for other parties like the premium times also alleged

https://www.vanguardngr.com/2019/03/presidential-poll-inec-credited-invalid-votes-to-buhari-atiku-tells-tribunal/

However, your fake website said 37 million accredited votes, can you now spot the difference

So you actually went to that website. You self na zombie. lol lol lol

shachris02:


what are the facts of the matter.

Were votes deducted from the petitioner?

Were votes added to Buhari.

Forget the number and face the facts of the matter.

The facts of the matter are

1) The observations of premium time was right

2) You deliberately tried to cover up with a phony website

3)You are now making judgments based on a petition that is yet to be deliberated upon in a court

Those are the facts

PFRB:


So you actually went to that website. You self na zombie. lol lol lol

I don do am since last week

Iamgrey5:
Bro don't be deliberately mischievious

This is an extract of a suit against inec and APC by the PDP published by most national dallies

This isn't a rumor like onnegen's case

That was How extracts of. Onneghen's. Assets Declaration was Flying around only to be a complete falsehood.

Did atiku's legal team serve premium times and other dailies copies of the petition?

tuniski:

That was How extracts of. Onneghen's. Assets Declaration was Flying around only to be a complete falsehood.

Did atiku's legal team serve premium times and other dailies copies of the petition?

The petition was submitted to the tribunal in front of the news media What were you expecting. It is worth noting that onnogen never attended a court session while those allegations were flying around.

Bra, keep hanging on to whatever you want to believe

For Atiku to win or loss this case depend of INEC.

INEC have to prove Buhari won the election that is what am seeing.

Iamgrey5:
The petition was submitted to the tribunal in front of the news media What were you expecting. It is worth noting that onnogen never attended a court session while those allegations were flying around.

Bra, keep hanging on to whatever you want to believe

You still don't get it. Submitting a dossier in Front of media and petitioner making a few Statements to the media ain't evidence of details.

tuniski:


You still don't get it. Submitting a dossier in Front of media and petitioner making a few Statements to the media ain't evidence of details.

You don't get it do you.

The contents were all announced and recorded by the newspaper.

Kingspin:
For Atiku to win or loss this case depend of INEC.

INEC have to prove Buhari won the election that is what am seeing.

If Atiku/pdp proves that accreditation was in excess of 33m then The Election will Be cancelled. Mind You rivers is said not to be included.

Iamgrey5:
You don't get it do you.

The contents were all announced and recorded recorded by the newspaper.

No it wasn't, that is not how Evidence are produced in Court. The legal. Teams are in. Trenches Trying to outdo. One another Surprise is key!

Okay, name the Witnesses.

INEC Needs To Prove To The Whole World That Buhari Won The Presidential Election. This Is Where It Becomes Tough For INEC! Where is my brilliant ChristianNorth bro, your input is needed here.

THE INEC'S SERVER FEVER AND THE INCONCLUSIVENESS OF THE 2019 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

So Buhari cannot celebrate like he did in 2015 because of INEC's server? It simply means that the real result of the Presidential Election has not been declared yet. Wike of Rivers State should not cry too much. He is not alone. The truth we must tell ourselves is that our true Presidential Election result is inconclusive. Perhaps the Temple of Justice will be bold enough to look into the content of INEC's server and tell the people who the real winner is. We shall wait.

Something tells me that the usurper of our mandate left the country out of fear of the inevitable. It requires a high level of cognition for one to steal from the people. I have read the over 140-pages petition from the 1st and 2nd petitioners. The facts are too glaring for any legal tussle. No lawyer or team of lawyers, however suave and witty, can divulge a copacetic response to the weighty cum fact-based petition I read. It is all over.

If the respondents could not hatch a single developmental project since 2015, how then can they respond to such evidence-laden petition? Buhari is gone for good. Even a trillion Naira cannot make the presiding judges turn a blind eye to the deluge of evidence borne by the petition. Atiku was indeed very ready for this election. Steal, if you wish, but as long as you leave loose ends, punitive measures will become the consequence of your action. Wrongdoing is an art. The APC has proven time and again that it lacks thinkers. This sort of rigging can be likened to a rabbit that buries its head in hole, whereas its body and tail are exposed. That SERVER holds the key. That SERVER will SERVE the intended purpose. Atiku's free kick will beat the wall and find the back of the net. Ladies and gentlemen, it is a goooooaaaaaal!

I saw a ward-by-ward, state-by-state analysis of the infraction of figures by INEC and felt for them. Whoever rigged this election this way must be a dunce! In ne'er every state, deductions were made from the petitioners. What a horrible way to rig an election! It is indeed difficult to rig your way through from a disadvantaged position. Shame on the APC! Shame on Buhari and his faceless, inept cabal! The people's will must triumph over anarchy. 1.6m deficit is just too huge to hide from us.

Comr. Russell Idatoru Sunju Bluejack

tuniski:


No it wasn't, that is not how Evidence are produced in Court. The legal. Teams are in. Trenches Trying to outdo. One another Surprise is key!

Okay, name the Witnesses.

Why will reputable newspaper publishers like premium times and vanguard use use the quote ( "" ) sign to report the particular area of the news if it wasn't a direct quote from the lawyers of Atiku.

Have you even read the report at all ..

Bro I am done with you jare

Lol! Excel sheet na server result?


This is a joke right? Editable server result. Weh done PDP