kosovo:

it's a plesure to quote you today, where actually have you being?? ve searched everywhere for this femaleGamer . . .

wow . .  Halo reach feels just the same, nothing but revision . . . it's all good . . . a money making franchise. But i hate FPS. .

Troll, much?
Good to know you'll hate Killzone 3

^^^ lol

texazzpete:

Troll, much?
Good to know you'll hate Killzone 3

Not far from the truth, i never enjoyed killzone2 that much . . .

kosovo:

Not far from the truth, i never enjoyed killzone2 that much . . .

SO in summary, you're saying that Killzone 2 and 3 are just more of the same crap, eh?
Please respond. I need a quote for posterity

[size=28pt]Bleep you microsoft [/size]

bring the rest of the halo franchise to the pc for crying out loud . we promise to to pirate them . . .too much

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killzone

Development

Killzone was announced in 2003 and early began receiving hype when video game websites began releasing previews and rumors about the game, having been dubbed a "Halo-killer". Upon release, the game received average reviews,[1] with frame rate issues, jumpy controls, and glitches being cited as problems.[2]
Wiki letter w.svg This section requires expansion.
[edit] Reception
Reviews Publication Score
PSM

9.5 of 10[3]
Game Revolution

Grade C[4]
GameSpot

6.9 of 10[5]
Gaming Target

8.4 out of 10[6]
IGN

7.5 of 10[2]
Official PlayStation 2 Magazine UK

9 out of 10 (previous score)

7 out of 10 (flashback score)
Review compilations
Game Rankings

73% (based on 80 reviews)[1]
Metacritic

70/100 (based on 67 reviews)[7]

Killzone received mixed reviews from magazines and websites. Reviewers cited technical problems with Killzone, including inconsistent AI,[2] occasional bugs, frame-rate issues, distracting graphical glitches,[2] repetition of the same voices,[5] short draw distance, and an awkward control system. Critics also complained about the gameplay, with IGN labeling it "underwhelming and mediocre"[2] and Into Liquid Sky stating that it "needs more refinement".[8] PSM stated that Killzone is "Graphically stunning and hits the mark in so many ways, it's baffling; they promised us we'd experience future war, and we have, and come away shaking."[9] In light of these problems, reviewers such as GameSpy commented that Killzone was not the "Halo killer" that it had been previously hyped as before its release.[6][10] On the positive side, Killzone was admired for its sound effects, its soundtrack, and its presentation of a gritty war zone [2]; it was also credited for its unique hard sci-fi art design.[10]

so much for the 'halo killer'

texazzpete:

SO in summary, you're saying that Killzone 2 and 3 are just more of the same crap, eh?
Please respond. I need a quote for posterity

Personally, i did not enjoy the game, but the physic and graphic is nothing the industry has ever seen. Halo reach didn't even get close!

still havent played it, dont think i'll be playing this one till we get reliable fast internet services in naija, but i heard it's the best halo in the whole franchise!! how true is dat (i've played and finished all the previous halo games cept halo wars.)

^^ I think Halo 2 was the "defining" Halo title. Obviously by today's standards Reach is the "best".