Ratello:
The Five Count Petitions Atiku Stacked Against Buhari (2nd Respondent)!

Arguing that Mr Buhari was not qualified to run for the office of the president, the petitioners argued in part, “The petitioners state that the 2nd respondent (Buhari) does not possess the educational qualification to contest the election to the office of the President of Federal Republic of Nigeria."

Cc: ChristianNorth, engineerboat, tuniski, wiseandtrue etc

From all indications Atiku has a SOLID case.

The evidences tendered so far are alarming

Any judge sensible enough, who does not want to robe his/herself in corruption or Injustice wouldn't spend much time in declaring Atiku the winner!

Having one's name written in gold is better than all the wealth they might be offered

Justice should be delivered ASAP

The Judiciary should do the right thing!!!

Nigerians are watching

Less I forget what happened to the DNA test requested by Atiku Time is ticking...

Wiseandtrue:


From all indications Atiku has a SOLID case.

The evidences tendered so far are alarming

Any judge sensible enough, who does not want to robe his/herself in corruption or Injustice wouldn't spend much time in declaring Atiku the winner!

Having one's name written in gold is better than all the wealth they might be offered

Justice should be delivered ASAP

The Judiciary should do the right thing!!!

Nigerians are watching

Less I forget what happened to the DNA test requested by Atiku Time is ticking...

Mace0lane:
Keep fooling your generation yet unborn

If Obasanjo can will his second reelection with over 25 million vote n Yar’adua can win his presidential election with another 25 million vote with Buhari going to tribunal at both instance and the election was not cancelled I wonder what any judge will disclose his wrong with him or her to anull Buhari’s victory.

Was any of them as controversial as that of Buhari

Obasanjo you mentioned wanted 3rd term and Nigerians fought and rejected it and he respected our wishes at the end!!!

Nigerians have rejected Buhari! His rigging is not the voices of Nigerians!

Buhari's crime is in the open! No judge can cover it! It has nothing to do with Yaradua or Obasanjo

It's about Buhari!!! Hello We are in 2019!!!

Wiseandtrue:

Was any of them as controversial as that of Buhari

Obasanjo you mentioned wanted 3rd term and Nigerians fought and rejected it and he respected our wishes at the end!!!

Nigerians have rejected Buhari! His rigging is not the voices of Nigerians!

Buhari's crime is in the open! No judge can cover it! It has nothing to do with Yaradua or Obasanjo

It's about Buhari!!! Hello We are in 2019!!!

Mace0lane:
Your head no fit correct forever !
Who does not know a 25 million to any candidate is a glaring fraud ?! What could be more controversial than a glaring outrageous fraud of votes ?! That is over 10 million votes that PDP can never account for forever.

Ratello:

I don't know why you are so diabolical in your reasoning. You are hungry, could hardly survive and here you are venting your anger and frustration on an innocent lady who is not your problem. Stay on topic which is, Buhari will be removed at last and shove your 25 milion ish where it truly belongs. Buhari and his demons choose to frustrate Nigerians from coming out to vote hence the reduction. People came out to vote under OBJ and Yar'adua so stop comparing apples to oranges frustrated man.

Ratello:

I don't know why you are so diabolical in your reasoning. You are hungry, could hardly survive and here you are venting your anger and frustration on an innocent lady who is not your problem. Stay on topic which is, Buhari will be removed at last and shove your 25 milion ish where it truly belongs. Buhari and his demons choose to frustrate Nigerians from coming out to vote hence the reduction. People came out to vote under OBJ and Yar'adua so stop comparing apples to oranges frustrated man.

Mace0lane:
You are even more foolish than the person I quoted. Jonathan that won his election free n fair with nearly every Nigeria trooping out from the north n South couldn’t even muster 15 million votes yet some idiot that ain’t half loved like Obj scored 25 million n mumu like you expect us not to take cognizance of the fraud but your father want Buhari that scored a modest 15 million votes to be persecuted. I sure say your head no fit correct.

That aside I will feed your father no stories with your cock n bull bs of being hungry n frustrated. Na your father wan frustrate me ?! Let see how your father will remove Buhari, baboon.

garfield1:
The op as usual is obsessed and fixated by the watery case of atiku.few evidences of malpractices in less than a 100 units what is intoxicating you.
In count one,it will be dismissed because server results cannot take the place of manual sheets while proving evidence of lawful votes cast.the evidence paraded by atiku is unlawful,vague,not precise,speculative and mere hearsay.

On count two,the allegation is the use of trader money to induce voters.this is purely a pre election matter and should be tried by civil courts.the petitioner failed to prove how it affected the elections.the tribunal is only interested in what happened during the elections at the polling units to the point of declaration of results.was trader moni in force during the polls? No.it was suspended before then.i hereby dismiss this count.

On count three,allegatiins of non compliance must be from all polling units.evidence of non compliance was only proven in 200 units which is not substantial.this charge is hereby struck out.

On count for and five these are purely pre election matters and outside the jurisdiction of this tribunal.they are hereby dismissed.

The entire petition is hereby dismissed and the election upheld.the petitioner is fined 20 billion for false claims and wasting the time of this honourable court

garfield1:
The op as usual is obsessed and fixated by the watery case of atiku.few evidences of malpractices in less than a 100 units what is intoxicating you.
In count one,it will be dismissed because server results cannot take the place of manual sheets while proving evidence of lawful votes cast.the evidence paraded by atiku is unlawful,vague,not precise,speculative and mere hearsay.

On count two,the allegation is the use of trader money to induce voters.this is purely a pre election matter and should be tried by civil courts.the petitioner failed to prove how it affected the elections.the tribunal is only interested in what happened during the elections at the polling units to the point of declaration of results.was trader moni in force during the polls? No.it was suspended before then.i hereby dismiss this count.

On count three,allegatiins of non compliance must be from all polling units.evidence of non compliance was only proven in 200 units which is not substantial.this charge is hereby struck out.

On count for and five these are purely pre election matters and outside the jurisdiction of this tribunal.they are hereby dismissed.

The entire petition is hereby dismissed and the election upheld.the petitioner is fined 20 billion for false claims and wasting the time of this honourable court

Wiseandtrue:

Was any of them as controversial as that of Buhari

Obasanjo you mentioned wanted 3rd term and Nigerians fought and rejected it and he respected our wishes at the end!!!

Nigerians have rejected Buhari! His rigging is not the voices of Nigerians!

Buhari's crime is in the open! No judge can cover it! It has nothing to do with Yaradua or Obasanjo

It's about Buhari!!! Hello We are in 2019!!!

haffaze777:


you will still be here by 2023 and say buhari rig for APC

Wiseandtrue:
No worry before then, Atiku go show am pepper!!!

garfield1:
The op as usual is obsessed and fixated by the watery case of atiku.few evidences of malpractices in less than a 100 units what is intoxicating you.
In count one,it will be dismissed because server results cannot take the place of manual sheets while proving evidence of lawful votes cast.the evidence paraded by atiku is unlawful,vague,not precise,speculative and mere hearsay.

On count two,the allegation is the use of trader money to induce voters.this is purely a pre election matter and should be tried by civil courts.the petitioner failed to prove how it affected the elections.the tribunal is only interested in what happened during the elections at the polling units to the point of declaration of results.was trader moni in force during the polls? No.it was suspended before then.i hereby dismiss this count.

On count three,allegatiins of non compliance must be from all polling units.evidence of non compliance was only proven in 200 units which is not substantial.this charge is hereby struck out.

On count for and five these are purely pre election matters and outside the jurisdiction of this tribunal.they are hereby dismissed.

The entire petition is hereby dismissed and the election upheld.the petitioner is fined 20 billion for false claims and wasting the time of this honourable court

engineerboat:



You will not stop to amaze me with this your submission.

In a tribunal case.

The petitiobal can bring up all available ground to support his case.

It's then left for Defendant to counter that.

So I will advise you to stop APC attitude of being the Judge and prosecutor at the same time.

If that is your mindset.
I will simply tell you, you have failed already

engineerboat:
I will dwell on ground 4 and 5 of the petition

4) That Buhari at the time was not qualified to contest in the election;

and

5) That the affidavit submitted by Buhari to INEC was a false affidavit.

Simply the petition didn’t say that Buhari needs WAEC certificate to contest, it simply says that Buhari was not qualified to contest on the basis of the documents he submitted, which had NOT A SINGLE CERTIFICATE.

If perhaps Buhari submitted his Primary School Certificate or even a Certificate of Furniture Making, that could have make sense because under section 318 as amended Primary school certificate is very compulßory, but did Buhari submit any, NO.

The point is that what Buhari submitted was an affidavit which dating is contentious.

Candidates for Presidential office in Nigeria are mandated to fill form CF001 and swear an oath that the information filled into the form is true - which Buhari did and swore to on October 8, 2018 - and attached to it his CV and another affidavit dated 24th November 2014.

In that outdated affidavit from 2014, Buhari claimed that his certificates and other documents filled into form CF001 are with the Secretary of the Military Board.

This claim was denied on record by Brig. Gen. Olajide Laleye in January 2015 - the video will be shown in court.

Furthermore, the schools Buhari claimed in the form CF001 to have attended simply did not exist as at the time he claimed in the same form to have attended them.

Again, the petition promises to call up records from the National Archive to disprove the information Buhari filled.

The outdated affidavit Buhari submitted actually said:

“ALL MY ACADEMIC QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTS AS FILLED IN MY PRESIDENTIAL FORM APC/001/2015 ARE CURRENTLY WITH THE SECRETARY MILITARY BOARD AS AT THE TIME OF THIS AFFIDAVIT”.

The problems here:
Not only is the affidavit clearly outdated, it was simply duplicated and still carries the reference number of Buhari’s 2015 nomination forms, not the 2019 nomination forms.

It also tells a lie that had been debunked as far back as January of 2015.

For his secondary school qualification in Paragraph C, Column 2 and on Page 3 of Buhari’s CF001 form as submitted to INEC, Buhari wrote “WASC”.

The problem here is that as at 1961 when Buhari claimed to have obtained it, there was no qualification known as WASC available.


This will provide direct opportunity for the Appeal court to once and for all decide on this case.

Previous attempt to make Buhari defend this certificate issue had be punctured by Buhari henchmen laying siege on the issue with those concern

Ratello:


Your hunger and frustration in life is like "Peak Milk" because it in you all the time you even carry it everywhere you go. Imagine this lost and bitter soul wey never chop belleful talking about feeding someone's father. if only someone who is close to you can.describe how you look now you will weep all your days. Suffering and still pretending to be fine.

Mace0lane:
This is how I look let see what your father looks like.

engineerboat:
I will dwell on ground 4 and 5 of the petition

4) That Buhari at the time was not qualified to contest in the election;

and

5) That the affidavit submitted by Buhari to INEC was a false affidavit.

Simply the petition didn’t say that Buhari needs WAEC certificate to contest, it simply says that Buhari was not qualified to contest on the basis of the documents he submitted, which had NOT A SINGLE CERTIFICATE.

If perhaps Buhari submitted his Primary School Certificate or even a Certificate of Furniture Making, that could have make sense because under section 318 as amended Primary school certificate is very compulßory, but did Buhari submit any, NO.

The point is that what Buhari submitted was an affidavit which dating is contentious.

Candidates for Presidential office in Nigeria are mandated to fill form CF001 and swear an oath that the information filled into the form is true - which Buhari did and swore to on October 8, 2018 - and attached to it his CV and another affidavit dated 24th November 2014.

In that outdated affidavit from 2014, Buhari claimed that his certificates and other documents filled into form CF001 are with the Secretary of the Military Board.

This claim was denied on record by Brig. Gen. Olajide Laleye in January 2015 - the video will be shown in court.

Furthermore, the schools Buhari claimed in the form CF001 to have attended simply did not exist as at the time he claimed in the same form to have attended them.

Again, the petition promises to call up records from the National Archive to disprove the information Buhari filled.

The outdated affidavit Buhari submitted actually said:

“ALL MY ACADEMIC QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTS AS FILLED IN MY PRESIDENTIAL FORM APC/001/2015 ARE CURRENTLY WITH THE SECRETARY MILITARY BOARD AS AT THE TIME OF THIS AFFIDAVIT”.

The problems here:
Not only is the affidavit clearly outdated, it was simply duplicated and still carries the reference number of Buhari’s 2015 nomination forms, not the 2019 nomination forms.

It also tells a lie that had been debunked as far back as January of 2015.

For his secondary school qualification in Paragraph C, Column 2 and on Page 3 of Buhari’s CF001 form as submitted to INEC, Buhari wrote “WASC”.

The problem here is that as at 1961 when Buhari claimed to have obtained it, there was no qualification known as WASC available.


This will provide direct opportunity for the Appeal court to once and for all decide on this case.

Previous attempt to make Buhari defend this certificate issue had be punctured by Buhari henchmen laying siege on the issue with those concern

Ratello:


I am sure you have no father perhaps that's why you are still looking hungry to me