Re: Votes From ‘atiku’s Server’ Excludes Other Parties by michoim(m): 6:13am On May 03, 2019 |
PDP laughable....they hacked in a hurry...infact they should go to jail 3 Likes 1 Share |
|
Re: Votes From ‘atiku’s Server’ Excludes Other Parties by Tospringe: 6:52am On May 03, 2019 |
GoodGovernance:
Internet registrars too do not lie :
DOMAIN SEARCH DETAILS
Domain Name Search Result for "factsdontlieng.com"
Domain Name: FACTSDONTLIENG.COM Registry Domain ID: 2368669415_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.domain.com Registrar URL: http://www.domain.com Updated Date: 2019-03-12T18:48:10Z Creation Date: 2019-03-12T18:18:18Z Registry Expiry Date: 2020-03-12T18:18:18Z Registrar: Domain.com, LLC Registrar IANA ID: 886 Registrar Abuse Contact Email: compliance@domain-inc.net Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: 602-226-2389 Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited Name Server: NS1.DOMAIN.COM Name Server: NS2.DOMAIN.COM DNSSEC: unsigned URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/ >>> Last update of whois database: 2019-05-02T22:10:24Z <<<
Atiku has been scammed !
Or perhaps, he is part of the scam!! Please help us explain further. |
Re: Votes From ‘atiku’s Server’ Excludes Other Parties by olajizz01(m): 6:56am On May 03, 2019 |
elotajohn1: Atiku might actually be the actual winner of this actually ended Election. But Las Las na Naija wey dey
I just weak for the Nation You mean actual winner in SS and SE,not in other four region. Guess he was rigged out in his pooling unit, and all his foot soldiers also rigged out as well. PDP know how to decieve themselves. 2 Likes |
Re: Votes From ‘atiku’s Server’ Excludes Other Parties by Freethesis: 7:04am On May 03, 2019 |
GoodGovernance:
Internet registrars too do not lie :
DOMAIN SEARCH DETAILS
Domain Name Search Result for "factsdontlieng.com"
Domain Name: FACTSDONTLIENG.COM Registry Domain ID: 2368669415_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.domain.com Registrar URL: http://www.domain.com Updated Date: 2019-03-12T18:48:10Z Creation Date: 2019-03-12T18:18:18Z Registry Expiry Date: 2020-03-12T18:18:18Z Registrar: Domain.com, LLC Registrar IANA ID: 886 Registrar Abuse Contact Email: compliance@domain-inc.net Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: 602-226-2389 Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited Name Server: NS1.DOMAIN.COM Name Server: NS2.DOMAIN.COM DNSSEC: unsigned URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/ >>> Last update of whois database: 2019-05-02T22:10:24Z <<<
Atiku has been scammed !
Or perhaps, he is part of the scam!! Oga listen. The date a domain was registered must not be older than the information in the website. I can have information on the February election and decide to create a website and upload the information in April. Because I registered the website in April doesn't make the information wrong. 1 Like |
Re: Votes From ‘atiku’s Server’ Excludes Other Parties by frowland(m): 8:40am On May 03, 2019 |
B1ak3: As days go by this Atiku's server claim is becoming more and more ridiculous. Too many loopholes.
-only two candidates -No vote for rivers state -percentage turn out is too high -why on earth would INEC upload a result onto its server that is different from what it is going to announce? If really there is even anything like server result in the first place -card reader only accredits votes and there is no form of electronic voting so how did the result get in the server in the first place -his server result doesn't say anything about voided and canceled votes -since the claim is that the election was rigged, then the manual results as announced for the ruling party should have been more than what is on this so-called server. How come the reverse is the case. Why would APC want to reduce their vote from 16million to 15million if they truly want to rig?
And the questions just go on and on. Now its becoming clearer how onnoghen would have been useful That bolded part got me thinking. |
Re: Votes From ‘atiku’s Server’ Excludes Other Parties by senatordave1(m): 8:59am On May 03, 2019 |
1 Like |
Re: Votes From ‘atiku’s Server’ Excludes Other Parties by Lordstephen9: 9:00am On May 03, 2019 |
With the look of things any sane person reading this will no that there is a mix-up somewhere Inec were not credible with d result collection |
Re: Votes From ‘atiku’s Server’ Excludes Other Parties by es144000: 9:54am On May 03, 2019 |
ManirBK: The votes polled by the PDP candidate in the February 23 presidential election, Atiku Abubakar, will increase with the collated results of the election in Rivers State as they were not included in his petition to the Presidential Election Petitions Tribunal.
Atiku had in the petition claimed that results from INEC server showed that he won the election with a total of 18, 356, 732 as against the 16,741,430 votes scored by President Muhammadu Buhari.
He, however, said that the numbers were without the results from Rivers State, which he claimed were not uploaded on the server.
But INEC had during its final announcement of results for the election on February 27 returned President Muhammadu Buhari as winner with 15, 191, 847 votes.
It said Atiku scored 11, 262, 978 votes. The electoral umpire included collated result from Rivers State where out of 678,167 total votes cast, Atiku polled 473,871 while Buhari got 150, 710.
The result from Rivers State takes the total votes gotten by Atiku on the server to 18, 830,603, while also increasing Buhari’s votes to 16,892,140 votes. However, the figures, which recorded a total of 35, 722, 743 valid votes did not tally with INEC’s declared valid votes of 27, 324, 583.
The results, which showed 43 per cent voter turnout out of the 82 million collated registered voters, also disagreed with the 36 per cent voter turnout declared by INEC.
Atiku’s result submitted at the tribunal was silent on the votes scored by the other 71 presidential candidates, whereas INEC recorded 869, 758 votes for the candidates.
https://www.dailytrust.com.ng/votes-from-atikus-server-excludes-other-parties.html?
not true |
Re: Votes From ‘atiku’s Server’ Excludes Other Parties by senatordave1(m): 11:09am On May 03, 2019 |
Lordstephen9: With the look of things any sane person reading this will no that there is a mix-up somewhere Inec were not credible with d result collection Did inec tell you that collation will be electronic? 1 Like |
Re: Votes From ‘atiku’s Server’ Excludes Other Parties by duwdu: 12:15pm On May 03, 2019 |
Freethesis:
Oga listen. The date a domain was registered must not be older than the information in the website.
I can have information on the February election and decide to create a website and upload the information in April.
Because I registered the website in April doesn't make the information wrong. And what's the source of your information? Atiku Server? Body Cameras? 'All join?' We thought so! ........ P34c3 ..... ... 1 Like 1 Share |
|
Re: Votes From ‘atiku’s Server’ Excludes Other Parties by MrsKMT(f): 4:55pm On May 03, 2019 |
muykem: Only IPOB take nonsense server results serious. All intelligent people do not take serious oh ! But this is too much na |
Re: Votes From ‘atiku’s Server’ Excludes Other Parties by Freethesis: 8:35pm On May 03, 2019 |
duwdu:
And what's the source of your information? Atiku Server? Body Cameras? 'All join?' We thought so!
........ P34c3 ..... ... That was not the point. The guy I responded to was trying to use the domain details of the websiite as a proof that the content of the website was wrong. Simply because the domain was registered in March. My response was to clear his claim. It's obvious you and the op I quoted don't know anything about Websites |
Re: Votes From ‘atiku’s Server’ Excludes Other Parties by duwdu: 8:07am On May 06, 2019 |
Freethesis:
That was not the point. The guy I responded to was trying to use the domain details of the websiite as a proof that the content of the website was wrong. Simply because the domain was registered in March. My response was to clear his claim.
It's obvious you and the op I quoted don't know anything about Websites Please don't go all emotional on me and hide behind the post of the poster you originally responded to. I was asking you my own question: What's the source and veracity of the "Information" you posted on your website? Simple. Please provide proof that you were not posting and propagating false information on your website - as is the terribly common trait these days. Sure that's not too much to humbly ask? Capiche? ........ P34c3 ..... ... |