2019 Presidential Election manipulation exposed
Logically, a significant increase in PVC collection ought to translate into an increase in voters’ turnout or total votes cast.

The below data showcase how the election conducted by inec defies mathematical & statistical logic mostly in the southern region due to electoral manipulation.

South East
PVC collection – up by 30%
Changes in marginal votes – down by 20% (manual collation)
Changes in marginal votes – up by 82% (electronic collation)

South West
PVC collection – up by 39%
Changes in marginal votes – down by 11% (manual collation)
Changes in marginal votes – up by 50% (electronic collation)

South South
PVC collection – up by 32.6%
Changes in marginal votes – down by 37% (manual collation)
Changes in marginal votes – down by 6% (electronic collation)

North East
PVC collection – up by 32%
Changes in marginal votes – up by 22% (manual collation)
Changes in marginal votes – up by 44% (electronic collation)

North West
PVC collection – up by 14%
Changes in marginal votes – up by 3.6% (manual collation)
Changes in marginal votes – up by 12% (electronic collation)

North Central
PVC collection – up by 40%
Changes in marginal votes – up by 9% (manual collation)
Changes in marginal votes – up by 29.7% (electronic collation)

FCT + 19 Northern states
PVC collection – up by 25.6%
Changes in marginal votes – up by 6% (manual collation)
Changes in marginal votes – up by 22.7% (electronic collation)

All the southern states
PVC collection – up by 34%
Changes in marginal votes – down by 23% (manual collation)
Changes in marginal votes – up by 27% (electronic collation)

National / 36 states & FCT
PVC collection – up by 29%
Changes in marginal votes – down by 3% (manual collation)
Changes in marginal votes – up by 23.8% (electronic collation)

Reasons for the disparities between the e-collated & the manually collated result

Southern Nigeria
• 3.79 million Votes were deleted from the votes of Atiku.
• 2.59 million Votes were deleted from Buhari’s votes so as to obscure investigation.
• Heavy deployments of the army in South South so as to dissuade voters from turning-out to vote.

Northern Nigeria
• 3.3 million Votes were deleted from the votes of Atiku.
• 991,000 Votes were added to the votes of Buhari in the following ways: 260,000 in North West, 619,000 in North East & 112,000 in North Central.

Nationwide
A total of 8.68 million votes were depleted from the votes of both Buhari and Atiku nationwide but with Atiku Abubakar being the NETT loser of 7.09 million votes.

The unlawful depletion of votes is the reason why the election conducted by inec defies statistical and mathematical rationality.

Logically, a significant increase in PVC collection ought to translate into an increase in voters’ turnout or total votes cast. Therefore, the e-collated result proves a fact that the 2019 election was manipulated.

Conclusion
It is only a thief that will prefer the manually collated result without audit re-confirmation. Please note that the electronic result is immune to electoral fraud.

I hope you now understand why some people love to argue that out constitution does not recognise e-voting. They are only trying to be too clever by half.

Yes out constitution does not recognise e-voting but e-collation & e-transmission are simply known as process automation.

An organisation does not need constitutional amendments to automate their tasks, procedures and processes.

Besides, out constitution in section 52 as amended empowers inec to determine the best procedure to conduct any election.

Sources of Data
Premium Times Services Limited
The Cable Newspapers Ltd
Nigerian Monitor, INEC Releases Statistics of PVC Collected in All 36 States for 2015
Wikipedia, 2015 Nigerian general election
Media Trust Limited, Here are the states with highest PVC Collection + Full List, Feb 21, 2019.

Ll