@femi your assumption in workings is not too clear, but.., let keep trying.

kunleweb:



It's glaring. CF isn't the centre half of the semi circle. Drawing a line to the middle of S1 is assumed. Nah its subjective and speculative. I rather protest a. Different formula for working this out

lol, recheck again, my centre was before CF

CF is longer than h


2. Drawing a line to the middle of S1 is allowed, especially when two or more circles are touching

3. What you have there is called arbelos theorem: i.e The radius of twin circle = R*r/R+r

ifada123:
@femi your assumption in workings is not too clear, but.., let keep trying.

which side is not clear

femi4:
lol, recheck again, my centre was before CF

CF is longer than h


2. Drawing a line to the middle of S1 is allowed, especially when two or more circles are touching

3. What you have there is called arbelos theorem: i.e The radius of twin circle = R*r/R+r

If the line CF is moved I won't agree oh. Let's all leave CF where it is permanently

I found the way out. Damn. Working maths on pad is..


It's easy
..


Can I say something ifada123?

@femi got the answer correct.
I will provide solution tomorrow maybe it will be more explanatory and convincing,
I can cant write now.

kunleweb:
I found the way out. Damn. Working maths on pad is..


It's easy
..


Can I say something ifada123?

Yes go on sir.

kunleweb:



If the line CF is moved I won't agree oh. Let's all leave CF where it is permanently

I didn't move it. I drew lines before it

kunleweb:
I found the way out. Damn. Working maths on pad is..


It's easy
..


Can I say something ifada123?

You use Corel draw?

ifada123:

Yes go on sir.

We will be speculative one way or the other. I don't see how this fight will settle without some speculations. I like Mr femis perspective but speculative was high in it. He shifted the goal post ni o.

ifada123:

You use Corel draw?

No

kunleweb:



We will be speculative one way or the other. I don't see how this fight will settle without some speculations. I like Mr femis perspective but speculative was high in it. He shifted the goal post ni o.

I will drop a more convincing answer tomorrow sir.

femi4:
I didn't move it. I drew lines before it

Egbon femo


I'm struggling to see how speculation will not be involved in solving this maths is the issue

In unclear mathematical problems like this a triangle is needed. So I'm tempted to draw a line from A to F to form AF so it would cut the semi circle into two to determine its radii, but we have some shady portion out..

ifada123:


I will drop a more convincing answer tomorrow sir.

A more convincing sounds like an half truth.


I'm looking for an answer devoid of speculation. If I also want to speculate, I will draw the full circle, build a square around the circular shape, and begin to dissect to find r the radius of S1 and s2

Jesus is Lord.


What am I seeing.


S1 and S2 is solved


Femi4 look well.


Draw a line from 6 to meet the radii of S1 and s2 we have a triangle there. Which helps us solving the S1 s2 parameter problem

kunleweb:



A more convincing sounds like an half truth.


I'm looking for an answer devoid of speculation. If I also want to speculate, I will draw the full circle, build a square around the circular shape, and begin to dissect to find r the radius of S1 and s2

Lol half truth?,
No half truth, base on calculation,

ifada123:

Lol half truth?,
No half truth, base on calculation,

Ok. I'm looking at S1 s2 and 6 and a triangle. Forming. Tomorrow you will crack this

kunleweb:



Ok. I'm looking at S1 s2 and 6 and a triangle. Forming. Tomorrow you will crack this

Yes tomorrow morning I will drop solution.

16(6/7) - (s1+s2) cm2

@Martinez29
@kunleweb
@femi4
@mrtruetrue
@eveyone
Check this
I am sorry it is long overdue.

This answer isn't for me. This is goal post shifting. That r there is a fake.