Donchukz:
Mr. INEC,since u don't have servers to transmit the result,but the question remains,was the money used for what it was meant for,if not; make Una return our #1.47b nah,abi snake don swallow the money,lets wait and watch,as things unfold

Enice:
it is not a crime and it is not illegal for INEC to experiment. what it simply means is that INEC cannot use results obtained from such experiments OFFICIALLY. not just inec, but other parastatal. research and experiments is being carried out regularly so as to improve the system. budgeting money for somthing does not mean that it was actualized. budgets are yearly instruments to achieve a target. so guy the budget has d

Psoul:


My brother, it is a crime. neither the electoral act nor our constitution permitted it then they used it for 2018 staggered elections. The results gotten from the server were used in declaring winners of those elections. What are you trying to defend here.

They went ahead to use is in 2018 unapproved and u are telling us that no crime was committed.

Enice post=79487333 :
it was not used and has never been used. it was only used as a tool to prevent election rigging. i repeat it is not a crime for inec to experiment so long as the result is not used officially. dhw

bus1:
This 'server' issue came into being due to FAILURE SYNDROME which atiku & supporters are suffering from, where the losing entity clings at illusions and shadows in a futile hope that the impossible will happen and the situation will be reversed.

In a few months, it will all die down finally.

INEC deals with huge amounts of information and voter data across thousands of polling units in hundreds of local govts.
All these info are stored on servers.

What INEC is simply saying is that they don't have a server where voting results were transmitted electronically to during the elections.

And because atiku's petition rests SOLELY on the imaginary notion that such a server exists, that is why any one with a brain knows that atiku's petition was dead from the word go.