Jayslicky:
The Judge just declared their union inconclusive.

sir/ma you are mad

Nthrone:
Wow,some of the issues that lead to most divorce cases can be settled amicably if only people will hide their ego and think.

HopeAlive14:
It beats my imagination why two people who started off loving themselves for years suddenly become enemies after marriage.

Let them go and work on their marriage; they will succeed.

victorian:



Oh ok

And people who did traditional marriage only.

No need for court decision on that as well?

Pappyto:


Most Valuable Person.

DrTee1:
Hey! Folks blaming the Judge do not understand what happens in Courts.

The Court is a place for legal matters - not emotions - and everything is done in the open, and can get into the media.

A Judge can refuse to dissolve a marriage even if the couples, both members of the marriage, agree to a divorce.

You've got to prove irreconcilable differences in court.

So for celebrities who are married by the Marriage Act, and whose breakup and divorce matters would get to the Courts (and social media!), where information revealed there is like being in the open market square and washing dirty linen, it is not like social media trials at all.

The couple who want separation have to really to convince a Judge that the differences are indeed irreconcilable, it can be very difficult to be honest and plain and not want to tarnish the image of the other party but leaving the real sleaze out - and still get a divorce when there is no hatred between the couple who simply want a legal separation.

The Judge would tell the couple and their lawyers that S/He was not there when they were loving each other and having fun to the extent of marriage and children - and s/he isn't convinced that the separation is irreconcilable. Oya, alele, go back home to continue your love and don't put your divorce on my head/name.

It is like Pilate washing his hands off the crucifixion of Jesus. It is difficult for people who don't work around the courts or visit it regularly to understand these things. To put it clearly, if two people in marriage do not exemplify extremely negative emotions towards each other, it is almost impossible to get a divorce before a Judge. For every friendliness the court sees, it would be willing to explore it and restore the marriage.

Judges are more interested in reconciliation of marriages than divorce. Marriage isn't for kids or people who cannot deal with extreme issues and keep the evidence if you ever want to get a divorce. Now, that is very difficult, because only a very wicked person can stay in a marriage and be keeping evidence of abuse against his/her wife/husband - so you see, except where there are clearly established cases of infidelity or threat to life or something - it is very difficult to honestly prove a case for divorce in court.

So yes, the next time you read something about proceeding from divorce cases, please know that in most cases, the issues are exaggerated so as to make the Judge get convinced.


N.B: Note that I didn't say 'all cases'

EzegeNG:


https://www.stelladimokokorkus.com/2019/07/exclusive-judge-throws-out-lilian-esoro.html?m=1

bukatyne:


Interesting

Our inability to call a spade a spade sometimes is amusing on our society.

If neither had known extra martial affairs, perfect.

Ubi is currently on his third/ fourth baby mama yet the judge thinks there is a marriage to save?

The said couple has not lived together for about two years yet there is a marriage according to the judge?

Lilian should appeal the verdict.

godofuck231:
when u marry olosho and she technically Watson to continue business she's bound to do this , the poor man isn't bothered she's the one breaking her marriage, he never threw her out

Ryan03:
You are very stupid, that dog that keeps impregnating everything on sight is not a husband but horseband. Nigeria "boys" and stupidity, I pity Lilian

Xisnin:


When one of them decide to go violent because of being forced together, I hope you
will be around to defend them.

bukatyne:


After Ubi has 4 children from four different women?

GogobiriLalas:
What kind of nonsense ruling be dis , na by force?

HopeAlive14:


None of them need to go violent.

Violence has never resolved any conflict.

godofuck231:
my be ure not aware of your stupidity ,as I can now see your inept father didn't breed u properly so u talk to people you don't know like the back as# water place you represent, if you are not aware there are things we men discover about our wives and fiancee and we swallow them even when the heat reaches the ceiling ,for the secrets to come out in court you will not want to look at the pictures of his wife anymore, they are ways to deal with an erring wife and which he did if you wish to know more about all she did before he decidded to impregnate another woman go do your home work properly, stupid oaf.

Ryan03:
You are a fool, i Dont need to know you, your post was enough proof that you are stupid. He didnt impregnate one but three women, if you can see reasons with him for this act then both of you are randy dogs. Your post stinks of sh!t

Ryan03:
You are a fool, i Dont need to know you, your post was enough proof that you are stupid. He didnt impregnate one but three women, if you can see reasons with him for this act then both of you are randy dogs. Your post stinks of sh!t

PHIPEX:
Of course I wouldn't support her, not because I endorse promiscuity by men but because we are still in Africa where men doing such a think is not yet "a crime".

We equally have to discourage the rate of divorce, every offense or misunderstanding must not end in divorce.

HopeAlive14:


To err is human, to forgive divine.

There is no marital conflict, no matter how difficult that not be resolved.

Tallesty1:
Which kain wahala be this?

cococandy:
No. It’s because you endorse promiscuous behavior in men. QED.
You’re in Africa is such a wonderful excuse. Africa is the reason why you don’t have a conscience or sense of fairness? Rolls eye