Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,152,744 members, 7,817,056 topics. Date: Saturday, 04 May 2024 at 01:39 AM

COVID-19: Dean Koontz Did Not Predict The Coronavirus In His 1981 Novel - CNN - Nairaland / General - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / COVID-19: Dean Koontz Did Not Predict The Coronavirus In His 1981 Novel - CNN (496 Views)

Coronavirus Outbreak Was Leaked In 1981 / Iran Allows Women To Watch Soccer, First Time Since 1981 / The Coincidence Between 1981 And 2018 (2) (3) (4)

(1) (Reply) (Go Down)

COVID-19: Dean Koontz Did Not Predict The Coronavirus In His 1981 Novel - CNN by Samakus(m): 7:50am On Mar 26, 2020
No, Dean Koontz did not predict the coronavirus in a 1981 novel

By Harmeet Kaur, CNN



Author Dean Koontz wrote a novel called "The Eyes of Darkness" originally published in 1981, describing a killer virus that some claimed echoes the current coronavirus outbreak. The coronavirus is officially a global pandemic, so naturally, people are feeding their anxieties by voraciously consuming movies and books about other outbreaks.

Some of them bear eerie similarities to what's happening right now, prompting some people on the internet to claim that certain storytellers "predicted" the spread of coronavirus.

One particularly striking example comes from a thriller novel by Dean Koontz called "The Eyes of Darkness."


In a tweet that has since been widely shared, someone said that Koontz had predicted the coronavirus outbreak based on a screenshot of a page in the book. But to say that Koontz saw all this coming is a bit of a stretch. A novel is a work of fiction, after all.


So let's break it down.

In the book, the virus is a man-made weapon

In the screenshot page from the novel, a character named Dombey narrates a story about a Chinese scientist who brought a biological weapon called "Wuhan-400" to the United States:

"To understand that," Dombey said, "you have to go back twenty months. It was around then that a Chinese scientist named Li Chen defected to the United States, carrying a diskette record of China's most important and dangerous new biological weapon in a decade. They call the stuff 'Wuhan-400' because it was developed at their RDNA labs outside the city of Wuhan, and it was the four-hundredth viable strain of man-made microorganisms created at that research center."

First, it's worth pointing out that in the original 1981 edition of "The Eyes of Darkness," this biological weapon was called "Gorki-400," in reference to a Russian locality. The name of the weapon was changed to "Wuhan-400" when the book was released again in 1989, according to the South China Morning Post.

It's true that the current coronavirus outbreak began in Wuhan, China. But the idea that the virus was created in a lab is actually a conspiracy theory that originated from unverified social media accounts and has since been widely dismissed by scientists from both China and the West.

Experts are still trying to figure out the exact source of the virus, but research indicates that it likely originated in bats and was transmitted to an intermediate host before jumping to people -- just like its cousin that caused the 2003 SARS epidemic.

In the book, the virus has a 100% mortality rate

In a later paragraph, the character Dombey goes on to say that no one infected with virus survives:

"And Wuhan-400 has other, equally important advantages over most biological agents. For one thing, you can become an infectious carrier only four hours after coming into contact with the virus. That's an incredibly short gestation period. Once infected, no one lives more than twenty-four hours. Most die in twelve. Wuhan-400's kill rate is one hundred percent."

That's not the case with the coronavirus.


First off, people infected by the coronavirus tend to develop symptoms about five days after exposure, and almost always within two weeks, according to a recent study.

Secondly, the mortality rate for coronavirus is not even close to 100%.

While the virus can be fatal, it's mostly the elderly and those with a weakened immune system or other health conditions who face more serious risks.

Officials estimate the death rate for the virus to be around 3% to 4% globally, based on the information they have, though they expect that number to fall.

So while Koontz may be a captivating writer, he's no psychic.


Cc. Lalasticlala


https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/03/13/us/dean-koontz-novel-coronavirus-debunk-trnd/index.html

Re: COVID-19: Dean Koontz Did Not Predict The Coronavirus In His 1981 Novel - CNN by Nobody: 7:59am On Mar 26, 2020
This could be true
Re: COVID-19: Dean Koontz Did Not Predict The Coronavirus In His 1981 Novel - CNN by meezynetwork(m): 7:59am On Mar 26, 2020
He tried
Re: COVID-19: Dean Koontz Did Not Predict The Coronavirus In His 1981 Novel - CNN by dangermouse(m): 8:10am On Mar 26, 2020
Koonz,my favourite sci_fi author.
Re: COVID-19: Dean Koontz Did Not Predict The Coronavirus In His 1981 Novel - CNN by KaideeGee(m): 8:13am On Mar 26, 2020
The real deal is still out there...
Re: COVID-19: Dean Koontz Did Not Predict The Coronavirus In His 1981 Novel - CNN by potent5(m): 8:17am On Mar 26, 2020
Interesting.
Re: COVID-19: Dean Koontz Did Not Predict The Coronavirus In His 1981 Novel - CNN by Samakus(m): 8:21am On Mar 26, 2020
KaideeGee:
The real deal is still out there...

I tend to agree
Re: COVID-19: Dean Koontz Did Not Predict The Coronavirus In His 1981 Novel - CNN by Omon605(m): 8:45am On Mar 26, 2020
Samakus:
No, Dean Koontz did not predict the coronavirus in a 1981 novel

By Harmeet Kaur, CNN



Author Dean Koontz wrote a novel called "The Eyes of Darkness" originally published in 1981, describing a killer virus that some claimed echoes the current coronavirus outbreak. The coronavirus is officially a global pandemic, so naturally, people are feeding their anxieties by voraciously consuming movies and books about other outbreaks.

Some of them bear eerie similarities to what's happening right now, prompting some people on the internet to claim that certain storytellers "predicted" the spread of coronavirus.

One particularly striking example comes from a thriller novel by Dean Koontz called "The Eyes of Darkness."


In a tweet that has since been widely shared, someone said that Koontz had predicted the coronavirus outbreak based on a screenshot of a page in the book. But to say that Koontz saw all this coming is a bit of a stretch. A novel is a work of fiction, after all.


So let's break it down.

In the book, the virus is a man-made weapon

In the screenshot page from the novel, a character named Dombey narrates a story about a Chinese scientist who brought a biological weapon called "Wuhan-400" to the United States:

"To understand that," Dombey said, "you have to go back twenty months. It was around then that a Chinese scientist named Li Chen defected to the United States, carrying a diskette record of China's most important and dangerous new biological weapon in a decade. They call the stuff 'Wuhan-400' because it was developed at their RDNA labs outside the city of Wuhan, and it was the four-hundredth viable strain of man-made microorganisms created at that research center."

First, it's worth pointing out that in the original 1981 edition of "The Eyes of Darkness," this biological weapon was called "Gorki-400," in reference to a Russian locality. The name of the weapon was changed to "Wuhan-400" when the book was released again in 1989, according to the South China Morning Post.

It's true that the current coronavirus outbreak began in Wuhan, China. But the idea that the virus was created in a lab is actually a conspiracy theory that originated from unverified social media accounts and has since been widely dismissed by scientists from both China and the West.

Experts are still trying to figure out the exact source of the virus, but research indicates that it likely originated in bats and was transmitted to an intermediate host before jumping to people -- just like its cousin that caused the 2003 SARS epidemic.

In the book, the virus has a 100% mortality rate

In a later paragraph, the character Dombey goes on to say that no one infected with virus survives:

"And Wuhan-400 has other, equally important advantages over most biological agents. For one thing, you can become an infectious carrier only four hours after coming into contact with the virus. That's an incredibly short gestation period. Once infected, no one lives more than twenty-four hours. Most die in twelve. Wuhan-400's kill rate is one hundred percent."

That's not the case with the coronavirus.


First off, people infected by the coronavirus tend to develop symptoms about five days after exposure, and almost always within two weeks, according to a recent study.

Secondly, the mortality rate for coronavirus is not even close to 100%.

While the virus can be fatal, it's mostly the elderly and those with a weakened immune system or other health conditions who face more serious risks.

Officials estimate the death rate for the virus to be around 3% to 4% globally, based on the information they have, though they expect that number to fall.

So while Koontz may be a captivating writer, he's no psychic.


Cc. Lalasticlala


https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/03/13/us/dean-koontz-novel-coronavirus-debunk-trnd/index.html


You might be very right though but he was precise to mention WUHAN which is the centre of the pandemic and he equally talk about a VIRUS which is very contiguous. Almost half of all what he said in the novel, if not more than half were true. To me I strongly believe he had information about the VIRUS long ago because for someone to sit down and start all those imagination is not ORDINARY, the format or how it suppose to happen might have change because of technology and other unforseen circumstances. I strongly believe the CORONA VIRUS is a laboratory fallout, I believe this is not the finished product and I also believe it will be more contagious than this and the mortality rate will be close to the 100% if the aim is achieved. There's no single person that can say what's really happening in the WUHAN LAB, and since China had been accused in so many ways they haven't deem it necessary to invite other scientists to inspect or investigate what's truly happening in the LAB. For Mr. Trump and other Congressmen to come out and accused China in public glare shows they have alot of information about this whole CORONA VIRUS saga. The author suppose to be interrogated to seem if he had information about it or the extent by which he know. They should please leave the peaceful BAT to rest. We had been eaten BAT since I was born and we are still eaten it till date. My father, grandfather, great grandfather, great great grandfathers had been eating BATS since time immemorial. Since when did BATS suddenly turned carrier to all killer diseases? OYIBO have so many questions to answer. People eat BATS in Nigeria everyday and they live around us and even lives in some of our houses. There has never been and pandemic in Nigeria cause by BATS.

1 Like

Re: COVID-19: Dean Koontz Did Not Predict The Coronavirus In His 1981 Novel - CNN by OdefaGirl(f): 9:20am On Mar 26, 2020
.... but there's a lot of coincidence in his novel
He mentioned Wuhan, pneumonia-like virus, and in 2020

1 Like

(1) (Reply)

Please How Can I Do These On Nairaland ? (See Screenshot) / I Can't Create Topic / I Have Taken A Lot Of Antibiotics But This Just Won't Go Away...

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 43
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.