TRUTH ABOUT CAMA.

Note the following:

1. The CAMA as recently signed into Law has been in the National Assembly _*SINCE 2004*_ under the regime of Obasanjo.

2. The CAMA bill was not an executive bill and therefore was NOT sponsored by the executive arm of government.

3. From 2004 till it was passed by the National Assmebly, several public sittings were held during the PDP government in the National Assembly for stakeholders to air their views.

4. These views were collated and compiled by the National Assembly and reviewed from time to time.

5. The CAMA Act as signed by President Buhari can therefore be said to be the wishes of the those concerned.

6. Today's argument amount to nothing as no government will just withdraw a law simply because an insiginifcant segment of the Christian "business" community are splitting hairs unnecessarily.

6. David Oyedepo went to UK to take money from account of Winners Chapel. The British Charity Commission investigated and found him guilty. He was sought to be imprisoned but escaped. He is currently banned from entering the UK.

7. Matthew Ashimolowo treated money in the account of KICC in UK as his personal funds. The Bristish government said "lie lie". He was declared wanted and abandoned his church, escaped and ran to Nigeria. Currently he is banned from entering UK.

8. Chris Oyakhilome is banned from entering the UK. He thought that Christ Embassy's money in UK belongs to him but the British government said "it's not true".

These are reasons why they are hounding Buhari's government and castigating a law whose amendment process began in 2004.

They want things to continue as they were. Not any more.

_Make they no comply make dem hear am._

Imagine lawyers also joining street voices to shout that an Act of the National Assembly that has been signed into Law should be "withdrawn".

NASTYNASOSO:
TRUTH ABOUT CAMA.

Note the following:

1. The CAMA as recently signed into Law has been in the National Assembly _*SINCE 2004*_ under the regime of Obasanjo.

2. The CAMA bill was not an executive bill and therefore was NOT sponsored by the executive arm of government.

3. From 2004 till it was passed by the National Assmebly, several public sittings were held during the PDP government in the National Assembly for stakeholders to air their views.

4. These views were collated and compiled by the National Assembly and reviewed from time to time.

5. The CAMA Act as signed by President Buhari can therefore be said to be the wishes of the those concerned.

6. Today's argument amount to nothing as no government will just withdraw a law simply because an insiginifcant segment of the Christian "business" community are splitting hairs unnecessarily.

6. David Oyedepo went to UK to take money from account of Winners Chapel. The British Charity Commission investigated and found him guilty. He was sought to be imprisoned but escaped. He is currently banned from entering the UK.

7. Matthew Ashimolowo treated money in the account of KICC in UK as his personal funds. The Bristish government said "lie lie". He was declared wanted and abandoned his church, escaped and ran to Nigeria. Currently he is banned from entering UK.

8. Chris Oyakhilome is banned from entering the UK. He thought that Christ Embassy's money in UK belongs to him but the British government said "it's not true".

These are reasons why they are hounding Buhari's government and castigating a law whose amendment process began in 2004.

They want things to continue as they were. Not any more.

_Make they no comply make dem hear am._

Imagine lawyers also joining street voices to shout that an Act of the National Assembly that has been signed into Law should be "withdrawn".

OP you well so? Which Chris is banned from entering UK?