Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,155,732 members, 7,827,681 topics. Date: Tuesday, 14 May 2024 at 03:03 PM

The Accidental Vs The Conspiracy View On History - Foreign Affairs - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Foreign Affairs / The Accidental Vs The Conspiracy View On History (264 Views)

ISRAEL Accepts Responsibility For The Accidental Killing Of 7 Foreign Aid Worke / The Guardian View On Putin’s Nuclear Threats Russia Is Losing In Ukraine / President Macron's Black T-shirt Sparks 'Masonic Satanist' Conspiracy Theories (2) (3) (4)

(1) (Reply) (Go Down)

The Accidental Vs The Conspiracy View On History by KwaraRat: 11:55am On Dec 07, 2020
This thread is neccesisted to check the growing army of anti-conspiracy shills who allege that world events occur as a result of chaotic human interactions and endeavours without no real powers behind all known and ongoing ochestrated world events.

These set of liars have been at the fore "debunking" all conspiracy agenda involving the plandemic and the end goal. To this aim they postulate that human history is chaotic without any control and that world events unfold as mere accident and that there exists no conspiracy behind wars and other woes befallen humanity .

It is believed that this thread will expose past confirmed conspiracy events that led to great human suffering .

Enjoy.
Re: The Accidental Vs The Conspiracy View On History by KwaraRat: 12:12pm On Dec 07, 2020
Wars start when one nation moves into the territory of another; depressions occur when markets take unexpected downturns; inflations occur when prices are driven up by shortages; revolutions start when the people, always spontaneously, rise up to overthrow the existing government.

These are the traditional explanations of historical events. Events happen by accident. There do not seem to be any causes.

But this explanation of history leaves gnawing questions in the minds of serious students. Is it possible that government leaders and others planned these events and then orchestrated them to their desired conclusions? Is it
possible that even the great catastrophes of history were part of this plan?

There is an explanation of historical events that answers these questions in the affirmative. It is called the Conspiratorial View of History and it is the alternative to the Accidental View, the view that is commonly held today. It is possible, therefore, to summarize the major events of history into two
alternative schools of thought:

The Accidental View of History: historical events occur by accident, for no apparent reason. Rulers are powerless tintervene.

The Conspiratorial View of History: historical events occur by design for reasons that are not generally made known to the people.
Re: The Accidental Vs The Conspiracy View On History by KwaraRat: 12:21pm On Dec 07, 2020
The American President, Roosevelt was quoted as saying: “In politics, nothing happens by accident If it happens, it was planned that way.”

If harmful events are planned, it follows that the people who were about to suffer through the scheduled event would act to prevent the event from occurring if they knew about it in advance.

The people expect government
to protect them from harmful events.

But if the events still occur after the government officials had been expected to prevent them, the government officials have failed in their assigned duties.

There are only two explanations as to why they failed:

1. The events overwhelmed them, and could not have been prevented;

or

2. The events were allowed to occur because the officials wanted them to occur.

It is difficult for the casual observer to believe that these incredible events could not have been prevented, as humane people of conscience do not allow harmful events to occur.

If a planned and unwanted event is allowed to happen, those who
planned the event would have to have acted in secret so as to prevent discovery of their plans by those who would be adversely affected.

Planners working in secret to plan an event that the people do not wish to occur are, by definition, members of conspiracy. Webster’s defines
conspiracy as a “combination of people, working in secret, for an evil or unlawful purpose.”

Not only must the Conspirators work in secret, they must make every effort to insure that their plans are not made public.

The first task of a conspiracy, then, becomes that of convincing the people that the conspiracy itself does not exist.

This makes the task of uncovering the machinations of the conspiracy all the more difficult.
Re: The Accidental Vs The Conspiracy View On History by KwaraRat: 12:52pm On Dec 07, 2020
There are three ways of exposing a conspiracy.

One is for any of the participants in the conspiracy to break with it and to expose his or her involvement. This takes an extremely courageous
individual, and that type of exposure is indeed rare.

The second group of exposers are those who have unknowingly participated in a conspiratorial planning of an event but who didn’t realize it until later.

These individuals, and there aren’t many in the history of the
world, have also exposed the inner workings of the conspiracy at great peril to themselves.

The third method of exposing a conspiracy is for researchers to uncover conspiratorial designs in the events of the past.

Contrary to all your doubts and what you have been lied to, conspiracy does indeed exist,
and that it is extremely large, deeply entrenched, and therefore extremely powerful.

It is working to achieve absolute and brutal rule over the entire
human race by using wars, depressions, pandemics, inflations and revolutions to further its aims.

The Conspiracy’s one unchanging purpose has been to destroy all religion, all existing governments, and all traditional human institutions, and to build a new world order upon the
wreckage they have created.

Notice that if the Conspiracy does exist, it will do everything it can to deny the charges of both those who seek to expose it and those who claim to have been a part of it.

There are those, perhaps not knowing the importance of their contributions to the study of the conspiracy, who have added estimates of the size of
this ruling group.

One was Walter Rathenau, who in 1909 controlled German General Electric. He said: “Three hundred men, all of whom know one another, direct the economic destiny of Europe and choose their successors from among themselves.”

Another informed observer, Joseph Kennedy, the father of the late American president John Kennedy, identified the number of individuals who run
America.

He said: “Fifty men have run America and that’s a high figure.”

Dr. Carroll Quigley, a professor of History at Georgetown University’s Foreign Service School, and who formerly taught at Princeton and Harvard,
has written a thirteen hundred page book entitled Tragedy and Hope

This book, published in 1966, was, according to the author, the result of twenty years of research into the Conspiracy.
I
Dr. Quigley concludes:

There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to
cooperating with the Communists, or any group, and frequently does so.

I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960’s, to examine its papers and secret records.


But Quigley took a step none of the exposers have publicly taken.

He admits that he is a supporter of the Conspiracy he has written about:

I have no aversion to it or most of its aims, and have, for much of my life, been close to it and many of its instruments.

I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its
policies . . . , but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.


The ultimate purpose of this Conspiracy is power.

There are some who desire this more than even material goods, although the two frequently go
together. One such individual was the previously mentioned Joseph Kennedy.

Family admirer and author Pearl Buck wrote the following in her book, The Kennedy Women :

“Rose Kennedy (the wife of Joseph Kennedy) knew that the man she loved loved a power beyond the power of money. He wanted the power of government, and he would have it.”

The Conspiracy that Dr. Quigley and others saw, then, needs conspirators, and it is logical to ask why illustrious men of wealth and fortune would
join such an enterprise.

One who answered this question was author Blair Coan who wrote in his book, The Red Web:

"The answer is quite the reverse
of the question: These men (involved with the Conspiracy) became illustrious primarily because they were part of the Conspiracy.”

So those involved do not become rich and/or illustrious and then join the Conspiracy; they become rich and illustrious because they are members
of the Conspiracy.

But what is their motive? What prompts men to seek wealth and
position?

Former US Congressman John Schmitz explains that there is an
additional goal: Powerful men join the Conspiracy to gain money and then power.

Schmitz wrote:

“When a person has all the money he needs, his goal becomes power.”

Benjamin Franklin explained this connection between money and
power when he said:

“There are two passions which have a powerful influence on the affairs of men. These are. . . love of power and love of money When united. . . they have the most violent effects.”

However, power itself has a corrupting influence on those who seek it

In an oft-quoted truth, Lord Acton explained power thus:

“Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely.”

Those who seek power will be corrupted by it. They will be willing to intentionally cause depressions, revolutions, pandemics and wars in order to further their desire for more power.

This corrupting nature of the very pursuit of power explains why the moral mind of the individual who neither desires
power over others nor understands the desire for such power cannot fathom why power-seekers would want to create human misery through wars, depressions, pandemics and revolutions.

In other words, the conspirators are successful because the moral citizen cannot accept the conclusion that other individuals would actually wish to create incredibly destructive acts against their fellow citizens.

Another power seeker, the Russian anarchist Bakunin, explained that this process of corruption even affected those dedicated to freedom who were
given power to protect the powerless.

He wrote that:

"... the possession of power transformed into a tyrant even the most devoted friend of liberty .”


The delight in the possession of power over others was explained by another observer of the power-seeking Joseph Kennedy:

“I like Joe Kennedy. He understands power. Power is the end. What other delight is there but to enjoy the sheer sense of control? He would say: ‘Let me see any other motive in the people who command it.’ ”

Power is their ultimate goal.

A power so immense it can bring the world to a full halt just as we are witnessing with the plandemic or deatroy everything and rebuild from scratch to their likings.

(1) (Reply)

Jobless Americans To Get $300 Weekly As Trump Signs Covid-19 Bill. / Top Kremlin Mouthpiece Warns Of ‘inevitable’ War With U.S. Over Another Ukraine / Strongest Hurricane Hits India! (video)

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 38
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.