gboyetade:
Na wah o. The table shows that it keeps taping down

Ogbeni, which school you go ?

The table is arranged in descending order,

gowonmaharajah:
Even Man U fans are no better.Too loud a team.

Not when you are constantly being trolled by a Chealsea fan.

Between OGS and Lampard who is tactically better??

He is just poor tactically.
He has a squad strength and firepower that can contend for the league anyday this was evidenced in the set up against sevilla.
But he still has a lot to learn as a coach and he won't get the time in Stamford Bridge.
He is making the situation worse by not changing formation or adapting good players into starting line up.
He has Pacy attackers but chose to do tickytacker and drag or slows the game down, expecting crosses from the wings.
It is so painful

Mopolchi:
Make Abrahamovich sack am jor! Lampard no dey tactical. I fit give you the line up of next match: Mount, Mendy, Kante, Zouma, Silva, Chilwell, Werner etc.

Boss e be like say u don forget d days of sarri.....
u can easily predict his line up, formation and d person wey him go sub...
Anyways, lampard needs to step up

cenaman:
Why is that most good players don't make a good coach .

Is Steven Gerrard a shoe maker?

Atk1nson:


The stats dont lie bro, Grant won chelsea the champions league and supercup, even Mourinho couldnt deliver that

which champions league?

He needs to step up as you said.

moshuur:

Boss e be like say u don forget d days of sarri.....
u can easily predict his line up, formation and d person wey him go sub...
Anyways, lampard needs to step up

Line up perfect as you said but no tactics behind the team set up. Chelsea team do not prepare for how the opposition is set up to play them.

autonomous22:


But the line up is perfect.... If he play them now, una go still complain.... What do u guys(Chelsea fans) want. The players are just not doing their work... Blame them!

Well, I rep Man utd... We are balling... And seeing Chelsea drowning gives me joy..

I com in peace

Nickisindigo:
Between OGS and Lampard who is tactically better??

Lol it's lampard . The Chelsea squad is just out of form. Na Man Utd I pity pass, they are in form right now but when they go out of form, it will hit them real bad

cenaman:
Why is that most good players don't make a good coach .

They spend most of their time training and improving themselves to consistent and got no time studying the game and what their coaches does and dont even have the time to watch other teams play. I remember one of the great players saying he never got the time to watch other team football match cus he has no time

HitlerGaddafi:

Lol it's lampard . The Chelsea squad is just out of form. Na Man Utd I pity pass, they are in form right now but when they go out of form, it will hit them real bad

OGS still got tactics and also getting support from sir Alex, but lampard is 0 when it comes to tactics and for ur information, the team are not out of form but lampard style of play is making them looks bad n not comfortable playing their positions well. Playing with a poor tactics will only makes ur players to be running around the pitch confuse

Nickisindigo:
Between OGS and Lampard who is tactically better??

Ogs is far better compare to lampard, man u players are off n on except Bruno and he got team selection problem sometimes also

Atk1nson:


The stats dont lie bro, Grant won chelsea the champions league and supercup, even Mourinho couldnt deliver that

I Thought it was Robero de Matteo

He came too early. I love Lampard as a Chelsea fan but I think the management should have allowed him to have at least 5years managerial experience with small clubs before giving him this big assignment. I know a few clubs like Madrid and Barca have tried inexperience manager before and it worked but it is a big risk.

Let's give him till the end of the season. I doubt our Top 4 run. Liverpool, Man U, and Man City have already napped the first 3. Everton, Leicester, Tottenham, Chelsea, Arsenal fighting for the last spot.

Thank God, Allegri is still available. I would have preferred Pochettino but PSG has hired him.

Avram Grants managed a few games. Maybe less than 30 games. he came in halfway to the season and he pushed us to Champions League and League cup final. He stepped in after we sacked Mourinho the first time. That's why he had that point per game. They can only average the games you manage. Poor me can even have 3ppg if I manage just 3 games and win all.

alignacademy:


O the power of stats!

Notice that even Mourinho who arguably delivered the best performance so far for the club didn't have the best points-per-game.

With that said, do you really need stats like these to prove that Lampard could do better?

Newman20:
Frank Lampard is one of the best players to ever wear the Blue jersey of Chelsea & nothing will ever change the love and respect that I've for him. But football is a result-oriented business & we must separate the player from the manager and decide whats best for the club.

Copied from twitter.. Dfkm

234GT:


Avram Grant didn't play as many matches as Mourinho, that's why he has that good score.

Grant was also clueless when he was there. He only benefitted from the work Jose had done, and the fact that the team was getting to the performance state when Jose was sent away.

People like you eehn. You don't know anything about the power of man management. That's how people said zidane was just lucky and he benefitted from a squad built by Mou and Carlo and that Ronaldo was the one bringing all the success. I'm glad he has proved y'all wrong.
While you're right that Gram played fewer matches than Mou, so did Guus Hiddink. The fact is that Grant managed the egos in the Chelsea room well and got them to focus on the tasks after Mou's ouster. The credit of the job done belongs to him not Jose

omonla10:
I will always blame d players.. Look at arsenal with 3 wins in a row. They started winning the moment arteta picked runners into d team(martinelli, Smith Rowe, lacazette in place of William, pepe and aubameyang) .

U need to close down opposition well. That's what made arsenal beat Chelsea.

Post-covid football requires endless markings and closing down.. Not names.. Cos there are no fans, the younger players are bold enough to attempt anything. No crowd to intimidate u etc.

. The best comment so far God bless you

omonla10:
I will always blame d players.. Look at arsenal with 3 wins in a row. They started winning the moment arteta picked runners into d team(martinelli, Smith Rowe, lacazette in place of William, pepe and aubameyang) .

U need to close down opposition well. That's what made arsenal beat Chelsea.

Post-covid football requires endless markings and closing down.. Not names.. Cos there are no fans, the younger players are bold enough to attempt anything. No crowd to intimidate u etc.

This your analysis should be on bbc.com/ football. Top notch

foleskay:

This your analysis should be on bbc.com/ football. Top notch

�� I'm so flattered

Galaticos444:
Actually,dey ar both specialist in failure

Aswear

Omega48:

Is Steven Gerrard a shoe maker?

Let him come to EPL and prove himself.