我们并不想让任何特殊组织成为实现这些方向的理想途径。我们所需要的（我们一直需要的）就是一种组织的生态学，各种力量的多元主义，在他们互相比较的力量上产生共鸣和反馈平衡。
自动化机器作为一般社会知识的进入，使活的劳动变成生产的次要环节，劳动时间是财富的尺度和源泉，而技术使财富不取决于人的劳动时间，但人并没有脱离资本主义生产关系，机器进入带来的可能是人被剔除，而不必然是自由时间的增加。
修正主义和加速主义不无相似的一点在于其政治光谱难以被定义：比起与之竞逐的马克思主义“正统”，这些倡议往往表达了主流之外的另类选项，并带有一定程度的激进性质。

We do not want any special organization to be the ideal way to achieve these directions. What we need (what we have always needed) is a kind of organizational ecology, the pluralism of various powers, to generate resonance and feedback balance in the power of their comparisons. As the entry of general social knowledge, automated machines turn living labor into a secondary link of production. Labor time is the measure and source of wealth, while technology makes wealth not dependent on human labor time, but humans are not separated from capitalist production. Relations, the entry of machines may be the elimination of people, not necessarily the increase in free time. Revisionism and accelerationism are not without similarities in that their political spectrum is difficult to define: Compared with the Marxist “orthodox” that they compete with, these initiatives often express alternative options outside the mainstream, and carry a certain degree of radicalism. nature