Any positive and competitive culture must have the basic assumption that reflect some level of general understanding and flexibility with a minimum of parochial and vested individual interest, rather of the collective well being.
Such culture, no doubt, must be able with minimum disposition deal with any transformation, irrespective of the evolving complexity of the change in question.
The willingness and disposition must be part of such an equation that demonstrates in an integrated manner in the system for it to function with a high level of commitment for the wellbeing of the collective interest.
The ability of transformation must be expressed in a balanced perspective about the demand and pressure from the external environment because any such demand will often come to be manifested in the ambivalent functionality of the system.
The same is true, that it is not always without ambivalent, the very benefit of any such transformation may bring about for the various invested groups.
As there is a competitive culture so also is there a stagnating culture which is an embodiment of a high level of the basic assumption that tends to reflect an attitude of rigidity in its oblivion to flexibility and in its tendency to align with the status quo and parochialism, to the detriment of the collective interest.
This is always a culture that is unable and unwilling to take the first step, due to what looks like a prevailing general attitude of passiveness and complacency about the issue of transformation, due to lack of the very spirit of disposition and ineptitude in any given situation.
It will be observed, that such inability, often stern from an inexpressed fixation of the status quo, the like of apathy towards the demand of the external environment. Therefore, the result of a fragmented functionality of an entire system is not without a resistance to actions that may jeopardize the vested interest and parochial preference with it's relative result of stagnation.
It has been presupposed, therefore, that any key meaningful action and model must take the first step of both structure and aspiring action for any transformation to be meaningful. But any aspiring action and structure is necessary and must stern from the extent of engagement toward the long term shaping of a new belief system and value based action. Of course, through this belief and value based action, information about the status quo will gradually emerge, as it specify the desire future, not without adequate definition in the formation of the require value system, through which materials and human resources are provided to enhance the system with some level of regulations of the desire transformations for the benefit of all.