Uteghe:
Was Osama bin laden in USA on 911? Find others ways of dousing your fears.

attackgat:
The Federal Governments case against IPOB leader, Nnamdi Kanu, is already very weak even before it started. Most of the things Kanu will be charged with are things that happened when he was not even in the country.

This means that Kanu did not directly commit them, so the prosecution will have to link him indirectly to the crimes.

Lets say someone went and burnt a Police Station, and Nnamdi Kanu is blamed for sending the person. Kanu's Lawyer is going ask how Kanu in London sent him to burn the station in Nigeria. If the suspect says he was instructed on Radio Biafra, the case is dead because Kanu never spoke to him directly. If the Person says another person close to Kanu, sent him, Kanu will deny the person. If he says he spoke to Kanu directly, unless he saved the discussion, the case is dead. And even if he saved the discussion, it had better be in a format that clearly identifies Kanu.

Trying to prove that someone in a faraway country did something elsewhere, is very difficult at best of times, unless you have hard irrefutable evidence. All I see the federal government has so far is hearsay.

DeltaFire:




Ha ha ha He He He!

In Western countries when a wife arranges for her husband to be killed, then she goes away even to another far off part of that country, she is still found guilty because if not for her, the killers she hired would not have done anything. Therefore if not for GANG LEADER Nnamdi Kanu, there would be no IPOBigots GANG.

GANG. Yes, I like that word. IPOB is a GANG.

Justice must prevail. Nnamdi Kanu must go to jail.

#Jail4NnamdiKanu

OmoOgunOriginal:
I'm just happy that OP admits implicitly that crimes have been committed and that Nnamdi Kanu is heavily linked with them.

All these hiding behind one finger...

joyandfaith:


Fg has to prove that he planned those attacks. If i say we are going to burn Aso Rock and the place was bomb few days later. Government has to directly or indirectly link me with bombing of Aso Rock. Osama planned 911 attacks

Uteghe:

But you said "he was not in the country" ,so he couldn't have plotted the deaths in igboland. That's the fallacy I challenged.

attackgat:
The Federal Governments case against IPOB leader, Nnamdi Kanu, is already very weak even before it started. Most of the things Kanu will be charged with are things that happened when he was not even in the country.

This means that Kanu did not directly commit them, so the prosecution will have to link him indirectly to the crimes.

Lets say someone went and burnt a Police Station, and Nnamdi Kanu is blamed for sending the person. Kanu's Lawyer is going ask how Kanu in London sent him to burn the station in Nigeria. If the suspect says he was instructed on Radio Biafra, the case is dead because Kanu never spoke to him directly. If the Person says another person close to Kanu, sent him, Kanu will deny the person. If he says he spoke to Kanu directly, unless he saved the discussion, the case is dead. And even if he saved the discussion, it had better be in a format that clearly identifies Kanu.

Trying to prove that someone in a faraway country did something elsewhere, is very difficult at best of times, unless you have hard irrefutable evidence. All I see the federal government has so far is hearsay.

joyandfaith:


Fg has to prove that he planned those attacks. If i say we are going to burn Aso Rock and the place was bomb few days later. Government has to directly or indirectly link me with bombing of Aso Rock. Osama planned 911 attacks

joyandfaith:


Fg has to prove that he planned those attacks. If i say we are going to burn Aso Rock and the place was bomb few days later. Government has to directly or indirectly link me with bombing of Aso Rock. Osama planned 911 attacks

Ojiofor:
There are tons of evidence against him that will send him to life in prison.
He was a careless ranting lunatic.

Unik3030:
it's like u don't know d meaning of documented evidences

Majority of his instigating videos are on social media n besides many of his comrades have been arrested so they will b live witnesses against him coupled with different evidences,u people don't know anything

Uteghe:
Was Osama bin laden in USA on 911? Find others ways of dousing your fears.

joyandfaith:
. Osama planned 911 attacks

gidgiddy:


The evidence had better go beyond mere words or the case will fall flat on its face.

UltraSphinx:

He means: "Was Osama physically present in the USA when the attack took place"?

Twice27:




U go sleep behind Bars.
Neva know something!!!

Ojiofor:


Creating ESN a armed militant group alone is enough to put him in jail forever.
The only thing that will make him see the light of day again is if another administrator grant him amnesty after he must have done 20 years in prison.

attackgat:
The Federal Governments case against IPOB leader, Nnamdi Kanu, is already very weak even before it started. Most of the things Kanu will be charged with are things that happened when he was not even in the country.

This means that Kanu did not directly commit them, so the prosecution will have to link him indirectly to the crimes.

Lets say someone went and burnt a Police Station, and Nnamdi Kanu is blamed for sending the person. Kanu's Lawyer is going ask how Kanu in London sent him to burn the station in Nigeria. If the suspect says he was instructed on Radio Biafra, the case is dead because Kanu never spoke to him directly. If the Person says another person close to Kanu, sent him, Kanu will deny the person. If he says he spoke to Kanu directly, unless he saved the discussion, the case is dead. And even if he saved the discussion, it had better be in a format that clearly identifies Kanu.

Trying to prove that someone in a faraway country did something elsewhere, is very difficult at best of times, unless you have hard irrefutable evidence. All I see the federal government has so far is hearsay.

The fact that personnel of these men where killed and their bodies dragged away ..isnt evidence??

The fact that when the protest was peaceful...you deliberately guned-down peaceful protesters in the full glare of the world ..isnt evidence??

ALL THE ABOVE ARE DOCUMENTED AND ESTABLISHED EVEN IN THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY...

Chris525:


Don’t worry about radio Biafra. Most of his commanders are in detention. He had direct comms with them. Their phones are in custody and are being harvested. Even the evidence in late Ikonso’s phone is enough to bury him talk more of the others. Even his own phone is with the DSS and they’re playing with it as we speak.

Even if one of his commanders agree to testify against him thats enough but they’re all in for murder and will be jostling against one another to provide info that will nail him for a lighter sentence.

The chicken has come to roost. Every one will now answer their father’s name.