Afam:

He hardly says anything. All he does is come down on anyone or indeed anything that says anything not soothing to the US, UK or Israel.

So, don't expect him to tackle the issues, infact you ain't seen nothing yet

You should change your username to Irony!    

I-man:

You should change your username to Irony!

Thanks for the advice but I reject it in Jah's name.

@I-man

Please translate all that stuff you said. I want to know if I should be angry or happy at those words you said.

I wonder where davidylan is? A topic like this is his turf.

@Denex

When I come to Nairaland,I often feel exasperated by what I read.Lets take this thread for example.The title says "US Senate Declare Opec Illegal". Yet,the very poster of the thread starts with a George Bush diatribe.Is Bush the "US Senate"? Here is the White House's opinion on the proposed NOPEC bill-Sean Kevelighan, an OMB spokesman, says the White House “adamantly” opposes NOPEC.”-http://www.heritageblogs.org/index.php/967_nopec-update

In effect,a bill is proposed which you and others are disdainful of.Bush also does not like the bill,so in effect,you and Bush are on the same side on the issue.

When the Democrats were elected,the bill was proposed By Congressman Conyers(Democrat),many were delighted.Yet,when the Democrats propose a measure,people attack Bush on the measure even though he is against it!How irrational and ignorant can you be?Its a classic case of Bush Derangement Syndromehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_Derangement_Syndrome

Can you see now why I am a bit exasperated with certain posts on Nairaland?

@I-man

I never denied that JUDGE Bush was against the Bill, I never denied that JUDGE Bush was on the same side as OPEC in fact I even mention that JUDGE Bush and Dick Cheney were members of OPEC.

What I said was that Bush is the main cause of the high price of Crude in the world today because of tensions he cause with the Oil Producing states. I also mentioned that Bush was doing all this on purpose in order to maximise personal profits from crude sales.

How can one man just decide to have problems with Iran, Iraq, Venezuela, Russia, Saudi and Sudan all at the same time? Is it sheer multiincidence?

@Denex

I didn't say you made that error but that many did.Just go through the thread,starting with the very first post.I was explaining to you why I am irritable.

Nobody reading through the thread's posts,including yours,would have realised that Bush was against the bill.So the vituperations should be addressed to the Democrats who support the measure not to Bush who is against it.Simple!

Okay.

Now that a lot of people know Bush is against this measure,I fully expect them to suddenly declare their support for it.Afterall,if Bush is against it,it must be good.

Ah! JUDGE Bush is 90% responsible for the current price of crude.