jonsnow92:
Carrasco No..Griezman Yes!..He gave that illustration to counter your baseless argument that Hazard doesn't score nor assist cos Chelsea was a defensive team..He then counters saying Atletico are more defensive and yet Griezman and Mr New comer Carasco has more goals than Hazard...
In order words dig deeper for better points..Thanks

hensben:
so are you saying carasco or griezman are better players than Hazard.

raumdeuter:


Yes they are all better than the Fraud Hidden Hazard

Chelseafan1:


This is just like comparing Lampard and Iniesta based on goals scored, Iniesta would never catch Lampard even if he is to spend 10 decades more as a player.

bigkesh:


Sorry Man you can't have it both ways

If Neymar is better than Hazard then Lampard is superior to INIESTA

You gotta pick one

Chelseafan1:


OK bro, shey u sha don agree say na Twitter guy hin dey talk about no be me, shey u don agree abi shame no let u?

Chelseafan1:


It is just Normal to compare two great players.
Neymar was 5th in one year's Ballon d'or, Hazard was 6th.
They are pretty close except for the high number of goals Neymar records.

But then, once Leo/Cr7 era is over, we go see which players go dey fight for Ballon d'or. Make we no dey stress ourself for now.

dmcdad:

And one other year Neymar was 3rd... You know where Hazard fell to that same year.

Heywhizzy:
isn't this enough reason to prove hazard already gave up on his ballon d'or dream,,.

Hype were prepared round him by media and mourinho stating he just need to score more often to be d heir to messi n cr7 throne..after few matches reality set in and dude hopelessly confessed he can't do it..who does that?

I can't count how many times the Belgian coach then challenged hidden to do more

DarkRebel101:


If he rarely scores and rarely assists, how logically sound is it then to still compare him to one (Neymar) who both scores and assists with dazzling flair?

And no, Matic, not Hazard, does Chelsea's "dirty job" - and by that I assume you're referring to the battle of gaining control of the midfield and in winning back lost balls.



Hazard is primarily a winger/AMF, and not a midfielder in its strictest sense. Comparing him to Iniesta doesn't cut the mustard as they both play in different positions.
It's only to justify the dearth of goals in his resumé that Chelsea fans recourse to claiming that Hazard operates from the midfield.

Newsflash!, Neymar also functions occasionally as an attacking midfielder for Brazil - the Confederations Cup is one huge example. And guess what? He was prolific while playing in the role - I wish I could say the same for Hazard.

If you are going to establish Hazard's supremacy over Neymar then you've got to do way better than these frail set of namby-pamby premises.

obiorathesubtle:



I hate to sound like this. I hate Chelsea as much as you all do.



But if Arda turan can score goals and pad stats while under the MSN wings.. I know Hazard can cause more good than Arda..

raumdeuter:


Carasco is also a striker, Mahrez is also a striker

Hidden Hazard failure has made his fans demote him from attacker to winger soon to keeper

raumdeuter:


Carasco is also a striker, Mahrez is also a striker

Hidden Hazard failure has made his fans demote him from attacker to winger soon to keeper

raumdeuter:


How does Hazard play that no one has ever done before? Mahrez, Carasco are wingers in a defensive team like you claim Hazard does. The only excuse is that Hazard is hopeless

freaklesschild:
That guy was dazzling from the start and look at him , still on loan for years now ... his he getting playing time over there ?

hensben:
so are you saying carasco or griezman are better players than Hazard.

Chelseafan1:


We would see about that, make Ronaldo and Messi comot finish, Neymar alone cannot keep winning the Ballon d'or year in Year out na. If Chelsea becomes a strong force in Europe nd Hazard is still an integral part of the team, nd we dey flog Barca dey win ucl, na Hazard go dey win am na

jonsnow92:
Carrasco No..Griezman Yes!..He gave that illustration to counter your baseless argument that Hazard doesn't score nor assist cos Chelsea was a defensive team..He then counters saying Atletico are more defensive and yet Griezman and Mr New comer Carasco has more goals than Hazard...
In order words dig deeper for better points..Thanks

hensben:
mr chu chu chu griezman is a striker. Running mouth like tap water.

Chelseafan1:


We would see about that, make Ronaldo and Messi comot finish, Neymar alone cannot keep winning the Ballon d'or year in Year out na. If Chelsea becomes a strong force in Europe nd Hazard is still an integral part of the team, nd we dey flog Barca dey win ucl, na Hazard go dey win am na

Chelseafan1:


The whole world knew at that time that, it was Hazard's worst season as a footballer.

SIRcumalot:
why Belgium and Brazil no dey factor into this Hazard and Neymar talk.

dmcdad:

No need to waste your time bruv because him understand and know the truth, but the problem na to accept am.

Chelseafan1:


But your people no let us know wetin we go believe, I'm sha very sure that Hazard is a really really fine player, he's very dangerous.

raumdeuter:


How does Hazard play that no one has ever done before? Mahrez, Carasco are wingers in a defensive team like you claim Hazard does. The only excuse is that Hazard is hopeless

bykebyke:
Mats with a 10/10 masterclass for Germany.


Bayern Munich fans on twitter are now insecure.

Heywhizzy:
So u even know for sure Neymar wld win it

dmcdad:

Hazard is a fantastic player in my opinion, but nowhere near Neyboi.