richmond500:
edit and put the source in ur first post den call on the mods

Mangekyo:

4

PrinxArthur1:
you ranked trident as No1 , this must be joke

On what basis will you rank US above Russia in an ICBM contest where is Topol-M, Bulava,Sarmat-2?

Patriot9:
These are the toys that keep Russia from attacking USA, and USA from attacking China or China from attacking North Korea
Simply call them "intercontinental Peace Keeper"

Mangekyo:

Very true. The nuclear weapons and ICBMS are the main reasons why the soviet union and USA never engaged themselves in the cold war. The result would've been devastating

Mangekyo:

Did you read the entire explanation?

abumeinben:

Wrong order


Even OP sef....very wrong.

US will not attack Russia because of the latter nuclear powerhouse (Satan-1 dey learn for where SATAN-2 dey: launching Satan-2 against US means Canada isn't safe. Get the picture?). China cannot attack North Korea because China is their big brother. So your statement should be: US will not attack North Korea because of China and if China enter market, Russia go escort them.... Russia going to market against US means NATO go follow US. Means WW3.

richmond500:
U did not add our very own deadly missile,
(Li-28 Nigeria)
Well if its in good condition and not faulty, it can mistakenly kill ten civilians, but if its faulty, the "collateral damage" can increase to 20.

It has a range of 300m, that means u have to push it very close to the target before u launch :-

PrinxArthur1:
yea and how is Trident II better than RS-28 (Sarmat) II AkA Satan II

Mangekyo:


I believe the reason why the trident is rated slightly above others despite the fact that it doesn't compare to them in terms of destructive power and range, is because it's the most powerful missile that is sub-marines launched. Which means it is possible to hit anywhere on earth as far as there is waters in the environment. The satan-1 & 2 both have better destructive power and also better range but they are shilo lanched and can be targeted sef. If they were submarine launched, then I see no reason why they shouldn't be at the very top

PrinxArthur1:
i don't wanna argue again, because I know RSM-56 Bulava can take care of the submarine based ICBM talk

richmond500:
U did not add our very own deadly missile,
(Li-28 Nigeria)
Well if its in good condition and not faulty, it can mistakenly kill ten civilians, but if its faulty, the "collateral damage" can increase to 20.

It has a range of 300m, that means u have to push it very close to the target before u launch :-

abumeinben:

Wrong order


Even OP sef....very wrong.

US will not attack Russia because of the latter nuclear powerhouse (Satan-1 dey learn for where SATAN-2 dey: launching Satan-2 against US means Canada isn't safe. Get the picture?). China cannot attack North Korea because China is their big brother. So your statement should be: US will not attack North Korea because of China and if China enter market, Russia go escort them.... Russia going to market against US means NATO go follow US. Means WW3.

Mangekyo:


Btw now and 30yrs, we're likely going to be seeing a war. Humanity would never remain d same again after that.
If the US, China, Russia choose to remain the bullies that they are, then it's gonna come sooner than we expect

PrinxArthur1:
yea and how is Trident II better than RS-28 (Sarmat) II AkA Satan II

Patriot9:

I listed them in no particular order and it doesn't matter who is against who or who is whose brother.
Like I said, those toys are the real world peace keeper.
These toys are the reason why China will NEVER and EVER think of going nuclear on US because US has the second largest of warheads stockpile in the world. I don't even think China or/and North korea has up to 1/3rd of warheads US has in stockpile.
These toys are still the same reason why US will never think of attacking Russia e.t.c.
The list goes all round like that.
No one wins a nuclear war. It's nothing but a fantasy

Mangekyo:

Just to be clear here, I would never have placed the trident II at no 1 if I was the real owner of the post as it's obvious it doesn't compare to the Russian missiles. But I just posted what I saw on the Source untouched

Patriot9:

Oga, don't start this argument. It's simply unnecessary. All ICBMs carry nuclear warheads which means deaths of millions of people is used.
Please, they don't rate warheads.

PrinxArthur1:
shhhhhhhhh ,go and read your books!

joyandfaith:


Those toys will be used to play somedays. It wouldn't be funny.

Patriot9:

Only those who detest reading would come out and be rating warheads

Mangekyo:


Btw now and 30yrs, we're likely going to be seeing a war. Humanity would never remain d same again after that.
If the US chooses to remain the bullies that they are, then it's gonna come sooner than we expect