CashMarley:
A friend of mine was arguing with another guy on a matter which the other guy disclaimed as exam malpractice. The subject was all about a guy in his centre who out of 9 ssce subjects did 7 all by himself and the invigilator who was present for the remaining 2 allowed them to cheat. He said infact, the remaining 2 he cheated, he did more than 60% by himself cos they were too difficult and because the invigilator said they must pay, I think it was physics and F/M. And the course he wants to opt for requires only one sitting. The guy even vowed that never ever will he cheat in university to obtain degrees, he said he'll work hard to obtain all possible degrees. He even said the reason he decided to cheat a little in those two was because he read hard for the exams but those two were just too difficult and he couldn't let them ruin the good 7 ones he had done before. He wrote jamb by himself and passed excellently well without cheating. Please what's your say on this?

femi4:
It is still exam malpractice so far it's against the rules of the examination.

The rules were set by WAEC not invigilators. If "he read hard" and still find the exam difficult, it means he didn't study hard enough

Pure water + 1% impurity = IMPURITY

Mercychen:
Ok, so what do you wanna term it if not malpractice? "Sirpractice?
Look look, no matter how you try to emphasize on the other seven he did and how difficult the remaining two were, it doesn't change the fact that it is what it is. Ok?

Just advise your friend to admit he has sinned and confess ( to God) then ask for forgiveness with a decision never to repeat such. Then move on with his life.

Things happen but you just have to acknowledge your faults, repent and move on. You owe no man any explanations cos no body is a saint.

CashMarley:
He even said the reason he decided to cheat a little in those two was because he read hard for the exams but those two were just too difficult and he couldn't let them ruin the good 7 ones he had

CashMarley:

Do you think he could read all 9 subject and remember everything perfectly well?

femi4:
No excuse for failure .....you don't wait for exam time before you start reading. That's why you ll go to exam hall not remembering half of what you read. It doesn't work that way. If you fail to plan, then you are planning to fail.

I have exam in December, but I started reading as far back as July. Reading should come with pleasure not pressure

CashMarley:

This guy started reading 5/6 months before the exams burning night candles. 9 subjects with voluminous syllabus. I bet there are some place you won't have touched since you have been reading! The guy admitted his mistakes already, asked GOD for forgiveness. I wonder if GOD even reasons the way you have just did

femi4:
It still boils down to planning ....reading and studying ain't the same thing.

femi4:
It is still exam malpractice so far it's against the rules of the examination.

The rules were set by WAEC not invigilators. If "he read hard" and still find the exam difficult, it means he didn't study hard enough

Pure water + 1% impurity = IMPURITY

Richy4:
A boy that went to a pot and stole one piece of meat... and a boy that stole 3 pieces of meat, what is the difference....The key word is stealing right?

You either cheated in an examination or you did not cheat... Fullstop.. there's nothing like I cheated a little... Cheating has no percentage

jericco1:
Omo cheating na cheating..

Just like a man that is to fast for a month and actually did it until the last day when he decided to engage in a sinful act while fasting.

Oga the 29 days he fasted has been thrown down the drain..

So now you get it

You're not GOD to disqualify the 29days. As for the remaining 7 he did by himself, is that also cheating?