Malami, who would rather not name people already exposed by the United Arab Emirates as sponsors of Boko Haram terrorists because, according to him, “Naming and shaming of suspects is not embarked upon as a policy by the federal Government out of sheer respect for the constitutional rights of Nigerians relating to presumption of innocence,” has no qualms naming and shaming alleged sponsors of Nnamdi Kanu and Sunday Igboho, a Yoruba Nation agitator.

To Malami, terrorists who shot down a Nigerian Air Force Alpha Jet, seized antiaircraft guns from the Nigerian military, detonated explosives on the Abuja-Kaduna rail tracks, breached the security of the Nigerian Defence Acadeny (NDA), killing two officers, have constitutional rights which lesser mortals like Igboho don’t have.

The AGF who said the Buhari government cannot name and shame suspected financiers of terrorism before they are tried and convicted because “shaming remains a consequence of judicial conviction,” gleefully pronounced Kanu guilty before trial.

Malami may think he is smart, but he is only hiding behind his finger as Nigerians are seeing through his fiendish theatrics and political maneuvers aimed at demarketing Ndigbo before the 2023 polls. That is not how to be a country’s Chief Law Officer.

READ: https://www.thenicheng.com/malami-how-not-to-be-an-attorney-general/

Butter is never a food for monkey. A quota system attorney remains a product of quota system.

Na quota system thing nau.