Take for example Newton that states that for there to be a change, then there must be a cause.
This simply means that all the changes we can see and observe has a cause, this is the backbone of science and all research works.

Since Newton law so far has being proven to be true as far as our visible and observable universe is concerned then the ultimate cause is not subject to this law and outside of it.

Is there any evidence to prove a creator does not exist because even science proved there is God.

Following

If they was a creator what makes you think that creator is God...

XXXXTENTACION:
If they was a creator what makes you think that creator is God...

Thank you for that question.

XXXXTENTACION:
If they was a creator what makes you think that creator is God...

in this context God and creator means the same thing, in most religion it is the creator who is called God, some believe the creator is not person some believe it is but the basic idea remain the same, there is a creator and this creator is called God.

Steep:
in this context God and creator means the same thing, in most religion it is the creator who is called God, some believe the creator is not person some believe it is but the basic idea remain the same, there is a creator and this creator is called God.

how did this creator come into existence...

Religion is trying hard to become friends with science while science doesn’t care

Steep:
Take for example Newton that states that for there to be a change, then there must be a cause.
This simply means that all the changes we can see and observe has a cause, this is the backbone of science and all research works.

Since Newton law so far has being proven to be true as far as our visible and observable universe is concerned then the ultimate cause is not subject to this law and outside of it.

Is there any evidence to prove a creator does not exist because even science proved there is God.

If it is the Abrahamic god you are referring to there is evidence such a god doesn't exist.

Steep:
.

Is there any evidence to prove a creator does not exist because even science proved there is God.

Gibberish!
Tell us your definition of this god. Tell us what this god consists of. Tell us its atrributes and also tell us its characteristics. Finally, tell us how you, who exists in our observable universe happened to know all that information when you already claimed that this god is outside our observable universe and isn't bound by our laws....

Steep:
in this context God and creator means the same thing, in most religion it is the creator who is called God, some believe the creator is not person some believe it is but the basic idea remain the same, there is a creator and this creator is called God.

The Christian god doesn’t exist, we have loads of evidence that the Bible is a lie and Christians are trying hard to hold on to the lies.
If you want to talk about god then talk about yours specifically. The Christian god doesn’t exist

Steep:
Take for example Newton that states that for there to be a change, then there must be a cause.
This simply means that all the changes we can see and observe has a cause, this is the backbone of science and all research works.

Since Newton law so far has being proven to be true as far as our visible and observable universe is concerned then the ultimate cause is not subject to this law and outside of it.

Is there any evidence to prove a creator does not exist because even science proved there is God.

Newton's laws does not support such a thing.

Science just studies and observes the world and it's workings, it doesn't make an argument for or against a creator. Whatever conclusions you draw on the subject are your own.

But if you could create a scientific methodology to proving and disproving the existence of deity, it will be much appreciated.

Steep:
Take for example Newton that states that for there to be a change, then there must be a cause.
This simply means that all the changes we can see and observe has a cause, this is the backbone of science and all research works.
Since Newton law so far has being proven to be true as far as our visible and observable universe is concerned then the ultimate cause is not subject to this law and outside of it.
Is there any evidence to prove a creator does not exist because even science proved there is God.

The reason many people do not want to accept the existence of a Creator as a fact is either one of these three things.
1. They do not want anybody to be telling them what to do on morals and behaviour, that’s why they call the Bible an outdated book.

2. They think that if there was a God, then there wouldn’t be so much suffering we see around us(this is a genuine way of thinking, however the answers are still in the Bible) and some may conclude that if there was a God, then he just doesn’t care, which is another fallacy.

3. They claim the Bible is filled with unrealistic events especially the ones that deals with miracles(I’ll expatiate on this more later and show that scientific theories also fall in this category if we are to look at it from that angle).

For a fact, we do not even need to be looking frantically for evidence to prove the existence of a Creator because the evidence around us is too glaring to miss. The only constraint many people encounter is when they choose not to properly examine these evidences for themselves and they end up becoming atheists.

DappaD:


The reason many people do not want to accept the existence of a Creator as a fact is either one of these three things.
1. They do not want anybody to be telling them what to do on morals and behaviour, that’s why they call the Bible an outdated book.

2. They think that if there was a God, then there wouldn’t be so much suffering we see around us(this is a genuine way of thinking, however the answers are still in the Bible) and some may conclude that if there was a God, then he just doesn’t care, which is another fallacy.

3. They claim the Bible is filled with unrealistic events especially the ones that deals with miracles(I’ll expatiate on this more later and show that scientific theories also fall in this category if we are to look at it from that angle).

For a fact, we do not even need to be looking frantically for evidence to prove the existence of a Creator because the evidence around us is too glaring to miss. The only constraint many people encounter is when they choose not to properly examine these evidences for themselves and they end up becoming atheists.

If I see evidence I will accept it.

The reason you want us to accept it is because you are indoctrinated with a very low IQ. You cannot think for yourself and you only believe before thinking.

Just fucking provide evidence or stfu.

Workch:
If I see evidence I will accept it.
The reason you want us to accept it is because you are indoctrinated with a very low IQ. You cannot think for yourself and you only believe before thinking.
Just fucking provide evidence or stfu.

Was it you I quoted ? If you know what’s good for you, respect yourself.

DappaD:


Was it you I quoted ? If you know what’s good for you, respect yourself.

Just provide evidence for all your ridiculous nonsense in the Bible or shove it down your throat.

Religion is a virus that needs to be cure. People reason like they don't have working brains

Workch:
Religion is trying hard to become friends with science while science doesn’t care

I am not taking of religion but the belief in God, it does not
Contradict science.

IMAliyu:

Newton's laws does not support such a thing.

[b]Science just studies and observes the world and it's workings, it doesn't make an argument for or against a creator. Whatever conclusions you draw on the subject are your own.[\b]

But if you could create a scientific methodology to proving and disproving the existence of deity, it will be much appreciated.

@ bolded I agree with you science does not disprove God but it is a very well established fact all the things we observe had a cause, so it is safer and more logical to believe in the existence of a creator than to illogical believe that things made themselves without any external cause.

DappaD:


The reason many people do not want to accept the existence of a Creator as a fact is either one of these three things.
1. They do not want anybody to be telling them what to do on morals and behaviour, that’s why they call the Bible an outdated book.

2. They think that if there was a God, then there wouldn’t be so much suffering we see around us(this is a genuine way of thinking, however the answers are still in the Bible) and some may conclude that if there was a God, then he just doesn’t care, which is another fallacy.

3. They claim the Bible is filled with unrealistic events especially the ones that deals with miracles(I’ll expatiate on this more later and show that scientific theories also fall in this category if we are to look at it from that angle).

For a fact, we do not even need to be looking frantically for evidence to prove the existence of a Creator because the evidence around us is too glaring to miss. The only constraint many people encounter is when they choose not to properly examine these evidences for themselves and they end up becoming atheists.

not just atheist but humans in general hate the truth

kingxsamz:


Gibberish!
Tell us your definition of this god. Tell us what this god consists of. Tell us its atrributes and also tell us its characteristics. Finally, tell us how you, who exists in our observable universe happened to know all that information when you already claimed that this god is outside our observable universe and isn't bound by our laws....

its only logical, if God is part of the universe then he won't be God.

Workch:
The Christian god doesn’t exist, we have loads of evidence that the Bible is a lie and Christians are trying hard to hold on to the lies.
If you want to talk about god then talk about yours specifically. The Christian god doesn’t exist

It is because you don't know what Christianity is nor the Christian God.

Steep:
It is because you don't know what Christianity is nor the Christian God.

I know that most Bible stories have been proven wrong

Steep:
I am not taking of religion but the belief in God, it does not
Contradict science.

I don’t know but Bible contradicts science. From Adam and Eve to revelation all doesn’t make sense in science

Workch:
I know that most Bible stories have been proven wrong

That's a Lie! I answered and explained them all and you and the other probers did not have any reasonable objection to make.

So you Lie, as Usual!

Dtruthspeaker:


That's a Lie! I answered and explained them all and you and the other probers did not have any reasonable objection to make.

So you Lie, as Usual!

So why didn’t you believe the Flying Spaghetti Monster story I explained to you as well?

Steep:
its only logical, if God is part of the universe then he won't be God.

When you finally answer those questions I asked, let me know.

Workch:
I don’t know but Bible contradicts science. From Adam and Eve to revelation all doesn’t make sense in science

123 + 456=? does not make sense to persons to an insane person even after showing and explaining to him how you got 579! He still will not understand.

Dtruthspeaker:


123 + 456=? does not make sense to persons to an insane person even after showing and explaining to him how you got 579! He still will not understand.

Same way talking donkeys, talking snakes, talking bushes and a zombie Jesus makes no sense to sane minds.

Dtruthspeaker:


123 + 456=? does not make sense to persons to an insane person even after showing and explaining to him how you got 579! He still will not understand.

Flying Spaghetti Monster created the Christian god.
Does that make sense?

kingxsamz:


Same way talking donkeys, talking snakes, talking bushes and a zombie Jesus makes no sense to sane minds.

He wants us to accept that, one Jewish Carpeenter was conceived without proper fertilization.

FSM forbid

Workch:
So why didn’t you believe the Flying Spaghetti Monster story I explained to you as well?

Simple, you and I already know you it does not exist as you yourself have confessed in the past, in those days you spoke The Truth, and it is settled.

Secondly, we all see that even you yourself do know that that shit IS NOT TRUE neither do you believe in it.

Thirdly, I showed you its weaknesses and you could not do anything about them, EXACTLY HOW ALL LIES ARE.

And this is a matter of TRUTH and TRUTH is not made or solidified because someone said, IT IS TRUTH BECAUSE IT UNSHAKABLE AND UNBREAKABLE BY REASONABLE QUERY.

AND YOU AND YOUR KIND HAD NO REASONABLE QUERY AGAINST MY EXPLANATIONS AND ANSWERS TO THE SEEMINGLY CONTRADICTORY STATEMENTS IN THE BIBLE, SO IT HAS BEEN LONG SETTLED.

Workch:
He wants us to accept that, one Jewish Carpeenter was conceived without proper fertilization.

FSM forbid

An irrelevant Jewish carpenter for that matter o.
One would have thought that such person who was capable of resurrecting from the dead and flying into space would have his name plastered all over history, but sadly, his so called powers are only acknowledged in the bible. What a shame.

Dtruthspeaker:


Simple, you and I already know you it does not exist as you yourself have confessed in the past, in those days you spoke The Truth, and it is settled.

Secondly, we all see that even you yourself do know that that shit IS NOT TRUE neither do you believe in it.

Thirdly, I showed you its weaknesses and you could not do anything about them, EXACTLY HOW ALL LIES ARE.

And this is a matter of TRUTH and TRUTH is not made or solidified because someone said, IT IS TRUTH BECAUSE IT UNSHAKABLE AND UNBREAKABLE BY REASONABLE QUERY.

AND YOU AND YOUR KIND HAD NO REASONABLE QUERY AGAINST MY EXPLANATIONS AND ANSWERS TO THE SEEMINGLY CONTRADICTORY STATEMENTS IN THE BIBLE, SO IT HAS BEEN LONG SETTLED.

I don’t know if the Flying Spaghetti Monster doesn’t exist, if I have to accept your narrative, I will also accept theirs.

I’m an convinced theirs is more correct than yours at least they presented some statistics and data