Policeman: “I believe that you committed a crime at some point.”

Suspect: “I dont agree. Prove it”

Policeman: “No, you prove that you didn't”

Suspect: “How can I prove that I didn't do something that you haven't defined?”

Policeman: “ah, so you did do it - guilty as charged!”

Version 2

Policeman: “I believe that on the 12th January 2022, you held up the bank at 15 High Street”

Suspect: “Prove it”

Policeman: “ Here's the CCTV showing your face. Here's a video of you running to your car and here are your fingerprints on the sack of cash”

Suspect: “ OK fair cop.”

What's the difference?

In Version 2 the person making the claim has that tricksy thing called evidence to support his claim.

2000+ years and we're still waiting for that evidence.

Workch:


Policeman: “I believe that you committed a crime at some point.”

Suspect: “I dont agree. Prove it”

Policeman: “No, you prove that you didn't”

Suspect: “How can I prove that I didn't do something that you haven't defined?”

Policeman: “ah, so you did do it - guilty as charged!”

Version 2

Policeman: “I believe that on the 12th January 2022, you held up the bank at 15 High Street”

Suspect: “Prove it”

Policeman: “ Here's the CCTV showing your face. Here's a video of you running to your car and here are your fingerprints on the sack of cash”

Suspect: “ OK fair cop.”

What's the difference?

In Version 2 the person making the claim has that tricksy thing called evidence to support his claim.

2000+ years and we're still waiting for that evidence.

U need d mark of the beast.

Come here!

Workch:

Policeman: “I believe that you committed a crime at some point.”
Suspect: “I dont agree. Prove it”
Policeman: “No, you prove that you didn't”
Suspect: “How can I prove that I didn't do something that you haven't defined?”
Policeman: “ah, so you did do it - guilty as charged!”
Version 2
Policeman: “I believe that on the 12th January 2022, you held up the bank at 15 High Street”
Suspect: “Prove it”
Policeman: “ Here's the CCTV showing your face. Here's a video of you running to your car and here are your fingerprints on the sack of cash”
Suspect: “ OK fair cop.”
What's the difference?
In Version 2 the person making the claim has that tricksy thing called evidence to support his claim.
2000+ years and we're still waiting for that evidence.

It's INSANITY going about wasting your energy, time and data trying to prove that the God other normal humans like you worship doesn't exist!
If something doesn't exist for real it's the adherents that should decipher that themselves not you who thinks otherwise!

It's disgrace and shame poured on you to ask for proof After I Have Given You and all your Yous THE PROOFS MORE THAN 31 TIMES AND NOT ONE OF YOU COULD EVER REASONABLY AND VALIDLY COUNTER IT.

And for the past 4 years there is still not a one.

AND TILL TODAY, NO ONE!

It's so high no one can ever get over it.
It's so low no one can ever get under it.
It's so wide no can ever get around it.
It's so strong, no one can ever break through it.

O how Mighty and Great and Unbreakable is The Word of The Lord

Workch:
...2000+ years and we're still waiting for that evidence.