yuping:
the difference is just that there greed is for developing the country why African leaders greed is to keep generational wealth for their family. Putin is doing everything possible for Russian to have some sort of control over Ukraine not letting them to be part of NATO.

Rossikk:


Greed to ''develop your country'' at the cost of destroying all life on Earth is a billion times worse than greed to enrich yourself and family at your country's expense.

Rossikk:
Another decade, another nuclear war brewing.

They might destroy their continent completely, the way they are going.

Or worse, the entire Earth.

This Ukraine brouhaha puts to rest the whole white racial superiority myth.

The European leaders are more stupid and dumb than African leaders.

At least ours haven't threatened to wipe out the entire Earth population with stupidly designed nuclear weapons.

Oh sure, the European leaders have managed to provide 'basic amenities' for their people with the wealth they stole from the rest of the world over the last 500 years.

But they slaughtered 100 million of their citizens in the last century's European tribal conflicts, deceptively called 'world' wars.

Fast forward 2022. And they are at it again. This time, nuclear powers are gathering around Ukraine, threatening to unleash their satanic, evil weapons capable of wiping out all life on earth many times over.

They are threatening to unleash total destruction on the world.

Over what?

Greed to control land, money, material things.

Who will give them sense to know that destroying the Earth over material greed for land and money is the highest form of idiocy, stupidity, godlessness, ignorance, and LOW IQ savagery?

Shouldn't we send a delegation of African elders to educate these savages?
That is reason Africa is more developed than Europe because Africa leaders like fighting tribal war for no economic reasons. Clap for yourself.

That is reason Africa is more developed than Europe because Africa leaders like fighting tribal war for no economic reasons. Clap for yourself.

Rossikk:
joyandfaith said:




What is the point of being ''more developed '' when you are pointing nuclear weapons at each other and threatening to destroy all life on Earth if your little geopolitical arrangement or ambition is slightly challenged?

YOU MUST KNOW it will be challenged at some point, so we are all really living on borrowed time. So what is the point?

Isn't it better to remain ''underdeveloped''?

At least you won't annihilate all life on Earth.

The Europeans are showing they can't HANDLE development.

Maybe no one can.

joyandfaith:


Development comes with a price. More inventions in science, technology and medicine were made during wars. Human history is written in blood. Even in Africa, tribal wars were common before colonial era. All great powers in history fought wars- Egypt, Ethiopia, Assyria, Persia, Babylon, Ottoman empire, Greece, Italy Spain, China, Russia , Japan etc.
Military intervention benefits no one. I prefer economic warfare to military invasion.

Rossikk:


The problem is not wars. The problem is greed, which leads to wars.

The more advanced the level of greed, the more people the wars kill.

Advanced Greed.

Advanced Greed led to the changing of war from what it used to be for thousands of years - conflicts fought with iron weapons with limited casualties - to the monstrosities we have today, called guns, bombs, chemical and nuclear weapons.

These were all creations of European leaders, who in their advanced greed, used Chinese gunpowder mixtures, which the Asians used traditionally for fireworks at religious celebrations, and decided to make FIREARMS out of them, with which they could use and subjugate whole populations and continents, to loot their resources.

It is that advanced, unchecked greed that has led us to this point, where we stare extinction in the face.

Traditional African and Asian cultures always placed moral limits on their greed.

The Europeans did not.

Their culture is dumber.

That's why we're here - 'developed', but staring extinction in the face.