openmine:

There is video and picture evidence to prove the contrary but you and VAR switched off your eyes in that moment!

TheGoodJoe:


Lampard just made a careless statement that was devoid of logic. I doubt he had even seen the statement released by the officials when he made the statement. He was talking that the ball struck Rodri on his arm when the match officials never said the ball did not touch Rodri on his arm.

He also did not talk about the red or green area for ruling, which shows Lampard had zero ideas of what he was talking about.

So after Lampard showed so much ignorance, you still want referees to explain his ignorance to you. Haa.

openmine:

Did PGMOL come out publicly to deny his claims...Yes or No?

TheGoodJoe:


No technology to show if all the ball has crossed the green area to the red area.

That side you are marking is not part of the discussion.

Haa. No wonder you people were arguing anyhow.

openmine:


Now do the same for the pic below
Yeye

TheGoodJoe:


The claims by Lampard were nonsense and off-topic. You do not need PGMOL to deny his ignorance.

TheGoodJoe:


You can not use the picture from behind because you can not tell exactly the marking off the ball. It has to show direct contact. That is why the Match Day referee and VAR Officials released a public statement stating they did not have conclusive evidence to rule offside.

If you were paying attention, I have said this repeatedly. You can not use back picture. It has to be a clear evidence to rule.

openmine:

If Lampard said what they did not say,its up to them to prove otherwise!
You assuming his claims were nonsense is irrelevant and witless!

openmine:

Oga use it on the pic nah....or are you afraid of admitting the truth?
Yeye!
You want to choose what to believe

TheGoodJoe:


There is nothing to prove. Lampard spoke off-topic.

Lampard said the ball struck Rodri's arm... The ref and VAR officials never said it did not touch Rodri's arm.

Lampard said the ref should have ruled handball... The ref and VAR officials said they can not rule because no clear evidence. So how does Lampard want them to rule?

He said his three-year-old daughter would have seen it...Even a grown man like him didn't even understand the rule, let alone his daughter.

So Lampard was just plain ignorant. No one needs to prove his ignorance. He already displayed it.

openmine:

Lampard is right because you dont even know the meaning of an arm despite your age!
Lampard made claims and PGMOL did not dispute his claims because they knew he was right and they made a dubious mistake that could have brought the entire VAR to a huge controversy!
Lampard claimed his daughter would see it and he is also right...Unfortunately,some folks here with eye problem will never agree because they only want to believe what they want!
Oga put ur magic on the other pic nah

openmine:

Lampard is right because you dont even know the meaning of an arm despite your age!
Lampard made claims and PGMOL did not dispute his claims because they knew he was right and they made a dubious mistake that could have brought the entire VAR to a huge controversy!
Lampard claimed his daughter would see it and he is also right...Unfortunately,some folks here with eye problem will never agree because they only want to believe what they want!
Oga put ur magic on the other pic nah

TheGoodJoe:


You can not use the picture from behind. Unless you want to guess. You have to rule from where you can see directly.

That is what the officials explained and you guys did not pay attention.

openmine:

A pen is viewed from all sides and this one is too perfect to ignore but you dont want to do ur magic on this!
Wahala for who get eye problem

TheGoodJoe:


There was no need for PGMOL to do any disputing when Lampard was talking off point.

openmine:

A pen is viewed from all sides and this one is too perfect to ignore but you dont want to do ur magic on this!
Wahala for who get eye problem

TheGoodJoe:


Another display of ignorance. If nothing, learn this now. When reviewing an incident, you look for the best angle, not all the angles. You check all angles to get the best and work with the best angle.

openmine:

Which one is no need for PGMOL to dispute....are you their attorney?

They refused to say anything because they knew they were guilty! Simple!

openmine:

Nooh you have both ignorance and eye problem combo
There is a top view,back view,side view and front view....All views agree that it was handball and the best view is the one behind!
Argue with your keyboard!

TheGoodJoe:


There is no clear evidence to show all the ball is in the red area. Simple.

TheGoodJoe:


Funny man. Are you saying that no part of the ball was in the green area?

openmine:

Oga na handball
U are just prolonging talk!
Admit your club escaped without being punished with a pen!

openmine:

So U finally admit it was handball abi...I knew you would finally adjust those failing glasses of yours to see properly!
Yeye!

TheGoodJoe:


Understand.

Lampard said the ball handball. The referee said the ball is handball but due to the new rules, they can not rule. There is a chance some of the ball is in the green area.

Lampard did not know anything about that. So what do you want them to do? Lampard is talking off-point. You do not need anyone to explain his ignorance.

Premier League clarify that the VAR team didn't think there was conclusive evidence that the ball hit Rodri more in the red area of the arm than the green. Nothing to do with offside pic.twitter.com/h6QhS6SEaW

— Simon Bajkowski (@spbajko) February 26, 2022

---

This is all there is to discuss and Lampard was not talking about this.

openmine:

Lampard said it was handball and he was right!
You just dont know the meaning of arm!
So you believe a journalist writeup but U refused to believe what skysports said!
Incredible

TheGoodJoe:


That has been the debate from start. No conclusive evidence to rule.

TheGoodJoe:


I do not want na handball.

No one is denying that. The problem is with respect to the rule. Get it. The new sleeve rule is not clear with conclusive evidence. Makes it difficult to rule.

openmine:

Nothing like that...what is obvious is what is seen!
And they apologised!

TheGoodJoe:


VAR has passed it was said. VAR works with evidence. They do not have conclusive evidence. Simple. Lampard was talking off point.

openmine:

Once again eye problem!
Visit an optometrist before looking at images either close or far!