*Tinubu Vs Obi's leadership credentials*

Political parties apart.

I want to address this subject, to ensure that we do not continue to elevate mediocrity due to sentiment and personal poor judgement.

See, I know some people like Peter Obi. It is okay to like him. I like him too.

But making his candidature look like a better candidate than Tinubu is a gross misjudgment by anyone who hold such view with all due respect.

By every standard of leadership, Tinubu rank higher than him, no matter the criteria.

This is not about personal likeness or political party, remove party or any of such perochial consideration, Tinubu's objective assessment will always place him above Obi.

So, let's keep political parties apart, let's address the person of Peter Obi and Tinubu based on what we know about their previous leadership engagement.

One fundamental leadership fact that has been established is that, there's no success without successor.

The quality of your successor will either consolidate whatever success you claimed to achieve or expose your deficiency as a leader.

If you have ability to choose good successor, it would mean that you have ability to select the right team. And if you did selected right team during your administration, there's great tendency that you would have achieved something good with the team.

However, if you couldn't select a good successor, it is doubtful if you actually selected the right team during your administration and if you do not select the right team to run your government, your claim to success would be doubtful.

This simple analogy works perfectly well to assess the capacity of any leader.

Now

Let's put Obi besides Tinubu and apply the formula.

Tinubu:

1. Claimed to have performed well as governor

2. Claimed to have selected quality team

3. Claimed to have selected good successor

4. ?

Obi
1. Claimed to have performed well as governor
2. Claimed to have selected quality team
3. Claimed to have selected a good successor

4.?

The point 4 is determined after the tenure of both men are assessed based on the output of their successor.

Did the point 4 justify the claims made by both men?

Tinubu

4. His successor is good. Built on the vision he initiated. Started new one's. Proved to be a quality successor.

3. Since his decision making ability on the choice of successor is good, it is likely that indeed, he actually selected quality team during his administration.

2. Since he indeed selected quality team during his administration, he most probably provided land mark projects of quality and governance because a quality team certainly have capacity to do that.

1. Since he provide landmark projects and initiatives, selected quality team during his administration, choose an excellent successor, he's most likely an excellent leader.

Obi

4. He had an average successor, if not poor one. The successor never built on the vision he initiated. Took a different approach, without any result. No legacy of performance.

3. Since his decision making ability on the choice of successor is poor, it is doubtful, if not outrightly false that he selected quality team during his administration.

2. Since it is doubtful or false that he selected quality team during his administration, it would be highly questionable that he achieved greatly or built any enduring project of vision, because the quality of the team he put together is highly questionable.

1. Since it is obvious that he selected an average of poor successor, with questionable claim of quality team during his administration and an outrightly questionable claim of vision, it is most likely that his claim to performance is also questionable and his leadership credentials is questionable.

If I am to recommend any of the two gentlemen for the leadership of this great country, irrespective of their political party, it is only wise, fair and reasonable that I recommend Tinubu.

We know who we want....


Meanwhile I fix car AC here in Abuja contact in my signature...

Comparing Tinubu with Obi is like comparing Ronaldo and Nani. Make Obi go sit down somewhere.

Comparing Obi with yinubu is an insult to Obi and a stain to him.
Abeg no include them for the same sentence yinubu suppose Dy compete with him fellow failures

Did I consider the financial capabilities of the two states they governed, the IGR, the federal
Allocation and the fact that every business owner wants to be in Lagos?


Ur opinion does not count shaa… u finally showed u are biased…!!! Coz u didn’t consider every factor!!!

bilms:
*Tinubu Vs Obi's leadership credentials*

Political parties apart.

I want to address this subject, to ensure that we do not continue to elevate mediocrity due to sentiment and personal poor judgement.

See, I know some people like Peter Obi. It is okay to like him. I like him too.

But making his candidature look like a better candidate than Tinubu is a gross misjudgment by anyone who hold such view with all due respect.

By every standard of leadership, Tinubu rank higher than him, no matter the criteria.

This is not about personal likeness or political party, remove party or any of such perochial consideration, Tinubu's objective assessment will always place him above Obi.

So, let's keep political parties apart, let's address the person of Peter Obi and Tinubu based on what we know about their previous leadership engagement.

One fundamental leadership fact that has been established is that, there's no success without successor.

The quality of your successor will either consolidate whatever success you claimed to achieve or expose your deficiency as a leader.

If you have ability to choose good successor, it would mean that you have ability to select the right team. And if you did selected right team during your administration, there's great tendency that you would have achieved something good with the team.

However, if you couldn't select a good successor, it is doubtful if you actually selected the right team during your administration and if you do not select the right team to run your government, your claim to success would be doubtful.

This simple analogy works perfectly well to assess the capacity of any leader.

Now

Let's put Obi besides Tinubu and apply the formula.

Tinubu:

1. Claimed to have performed well as governor

2. Claimed to have selected quality team

3. Claimed to have selected good successor

4. ?

Obi
1. Claimed to have performed well as governor
2. Claimed to have selected quality team
3. Claimed to have selected a good successor

4.?

The point 4 is determined after the tenure of both men are assessed based on the output of their successor.

Did the point 4 justify the claims made by both men?

Tinubu

4. His successor is good. Built on the vision he initiated. Started new one's. Proved to be a quality successor.

3. Since his decision making ability on the choice of successor is good, it is likely that indeed, he actually selected quality team during his administration.

2. Since he indeed selected quality team during his administration, he most probably provided land mark projects of quality and governance because a quality team certainly have capacity to do that.

1. Since he provide landmark projects and initiatives, selected quality team during his administration, choose an excellent successor, he's most likely an excellent leader.

Obi

4. He had an average successor, if not poor one. The successor never built on the vision he initiated. Took a different approach, without any result. No legacy of performance.

3. Since his decision making ability on the choice of successor is poor, it is doubtful, if not outrightly false that he selected quality team during his administration.

2. Since it is doubtful or false that he selected quality team during his administration, it would be highly questionable that he achieved greatly or built any enduring project of vision, because the quality of the team he put together is highly questionable.

1. Since it is obvious that he selected an average of poor successor, with questionable claim of quality team during his administration and an outrightly questionable claim of vision, it is most likely that his claim to performance is also questionable and his leadership credentials is questionable.

If I am to recommend any of the two gentlemen for the leadership of this great country, irrespective of their political party, it is only wise, fair and reasonable that I recommend Tinubu.

Peter Obi destroyed PDP cabals in Anambra. If Peter is from Lagos he would have crunbled Tinubu political empire

XerXers:
Peter Obi destroyed PDP cabals in Anambra. If Peter is from Lagos he would have crunbled Tinubu political empire

You are funny

We must also compare their abilities to raise up the national flag