Machine learning and Artificial Intelligence might have gone too far.
Known as a deadbot, this type of chatbot allowed a man named Barbeau to exchange text messages with an artificial “Jessica”. Despite the ethically controversial nature of the case, why would it be right or wrong, ethically desirable or reprehensible, to develop a deadbot?
Since Jessica was a real (albeit dead) person, Barbeau consenting to the creation of a deadbot mimicking her seems insufficient. Even when they die, people are not mere things with which others can do as they please. This is why our societies consider it wrong to desecrate or to be disrespectful to the memory of the dead. In other words, we have certain moral obligations towards the dead, insofar as death does not necessarily imply that people cease to exist in a morally relevant way.

In what specific terms something might be detrimental to the dead is a particularly complex issue that I will not analyze in full. It is worth noting, however, that even if the dead cannot be harmed or offended in the same way as the living, this does not mean that they are invulnerable to bad actions, nor that these are ethical. The dead can suffer damages to their honor, reputation, or dignity (for example, posthumous smear campaigns), and disrespect toward the dead also harms those close to them. Moreover, behaving badly toward the dead leads us to a society that is more unjust and less respectful to people’s dignity overall.
source:http://advanxis.com/blog-news
for similar stories visit: http://advanxis.com/blog-news/news

i see angel numbers 11;11

its crazy at this point what these guys are doing under the guise of technology.

CRAZY

haaaa nawa o

just imagine. person no fit rest in peace again