Mufakirnaqdiun:
Lol

Amotolongbo:
If I could believe this Noah’s story, why could I not believe Odudua also descended from heaven with chain, cock and guard of sand?

Amotolongbo:
If I could believe this Noah’s story, why could I not believe Odudua also descended from heaven with chain, cock and guard of sand?

Zonefree:
Anti Christ, anything Divine dey always purge you.

Amotolongbo:
If I could believe this Noah’s story, why could I not believe Odudua also descended from heaven with chain, cock and guard of sand?

Every human race, tribe et al have one myth or story of creation and existence. It is all inferiority complex to believe one myth/story stands above yours.

jesusjnr2020:
Lol!

Even with pictorial evidence? Yet you could believe those said to taken from mars by scientists? Or have you been there before yourself?

This is obviously not about the Truth but the fact that you're passionately and obsessively opposed to the things of God.

So stop pretending...

jesusjnr2020:
Lol!

Even with pictorial evidence? Yet you could believe those said to taken from mars by scientists? Or have you been there before yourself?

This is obviously not about the Truth but the fact that you're passionately and obsessively opposed to the things of God.

So stop pretending...

Amotolongbo:
Please, pictorial evidence of what?

Mufakirnaqdiun:

Baba say pictorial evidence,oga give us better evidence abeg.
Or you no get better source make we for verify?

Ogbeni read and stop sounding illogical abeg.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Searches_for_Noah%27s_Ark

jesusjnr2020:
Genesis 8:4 (KJV)

And the ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat.

Provided below is pictorial proof of Noah's ark, confirming the exact measurements and also the wooden material used to built it as was written in the Bible, lying on mount Ararat somewhere in modern Turkey, exactly where it was also said to have rested in the Bible.

God bless.

jesusjnr2020:
Am I surprised?

Of course, you wouldn't see it because it has something to do with God.

Mufakirnaqdiun:
Obob so people still believe in a myth plagiarized from earlier Mesopotamian myths, an area where disastrous floods are common.

To recap:
A world-wide flood is impossible.
A wooden boat that big is impossible.
A six-hundred year old man and his kids building that boat is even more impossible.

A six-hundred year old man…impossible.
Getting all the millions of species (some that can't even move!) together in a boat is impossible.

All of them reintroducing their species from just two each is biologically impossible.
And, really, any of them surviving in a world where literally every ecosystem on the planet is now gone, literally washed away, is impossible.

Oh, and an Omniscient, Omnipotent god who decides to destroy all life on the planet, but then changes his mind…impossible.
Really, literally nothing about the story is possible, nor makes the slightest bit of sense.
A world-wide flood would have left plenty of sedimentary evidence. Geologists have being digging into the earth for more than two hundred years, yet have found no sign of a world-wide flood, ever, let alone in the professed time period. It's also a sure bet that geologists have specifically looked for evidence of possible world-wide floods.

A world-wide flood would have contaminated all open fresh water reserves, including all lakes and rivers. This would have killed off all freshwater fish, but the fossil record does not support this.
When an exhaustive search has been undertaken and found no evidence, the lack of evidence is evidence. As well, deductive reasoning and common sense should count as evidence. For example, it's known that two specimens alone cannot resurrect a species.

Of course, this is just the tip of the iceberg as far as evidence for why it's safe to conclude that Noah's Ark is no more than a silly myth,let it go.

jesusjnr2020:
Am I surprised?

Of course, you wouldn't see it because it has something to do with God.

https://m.jpost.com/archaeology/has-the-location-of-noahs-ark-finally-been-proven-using-3d-scans-680890/amp

https://answersingenesis.org/noahs-ark/noahs-ark-found/noahs-ark-mount-ararat/

jesusjnr2020:
Noah's Ark: Man's Greatest Invention Of All Time?

I often say that perhaps the most important factor that defines an invention, is the time of the invention, because it's proven to be a key determining factor of its value before man.

For instance, if the person who invented the incandescent light bulb, had not invented it at the time he did, but only achieved it today, that same highly esteemed invention would have been of little or no value today considering the level of scientific and technological advancements of this day and age.

Therefore the value ascribed to the invention was with respect to the time that the invention was achieved.

However in spite of the high estimation of that particular invention because of the time it was done, which was in the late 1870s, if that same invention was instead achieved a century before that, the value of the invention would have appreciated even further with respect to the level of science and technological advancements available at that particular time.

That's what would keep happening if it the time of the invention was continually further back-dated, as its value would consequently keep rising in that respect.

That brings me to the Ark that was built by Noah in the early days of man's existence on the Earth.

The extent of sophistication required in the process of that invention alone, would have made it to still be considered a masterpiece of high value and estimation had it been achieved even in the nineteenth century AD, yet it took place thousands upon thousands of years before that!

Ordinarily, that should easily make it to be regarded as one of if not the greatest invention in the history of man's existence, however, instead its authenticity was being questioned by many in the science world, because of the extent of advanced technology required to build the ark with respect to the time and age of the invention. That in addition to the stark illiteracy level of the supposed inventor and the fact that the invention was recorded invented in the Bible.

What they failed to realize, however, is the fact that God who had given Noah the capability to built the ark, is the source of all knowledge, including that which yet lies undiscovered and unknown to man and the science world, therefore if He had decided to build a rocket that would land on the moon or any of the planets at that very time, He would have still made it happen just the same way He did with Noah in the instance of the Ark, simply by giving man the knowledge, expertise, and materials to execute it, and it would be done.

Therefore even if the man be a stark illiterate and as ancient as stone-aged Noah was, and without any single scientific knowledge, he would have still been able to achieve such an unprecedented feat.

Moreover that is the way God prefers to do His things, using the foolish and ignorant things of world to confound the wise, e.g. scientists, as that gives Him greater glory, because His ability and knowledge is made perfect in weakness and ignorance respectively. 1 Corinthians 1:27

So for those so-called "wise ones" who were yet confounded about this and still do not want to believe that Noah's Ark was indeed a true story because it appears too sophisticated and technologically advanced at the time to be true, they should also understand that it is actually the whole idea behind Noah's Ark, that made it to be man's greatest invention of all time!

God bless

Draslo:

Every ancient civilization has a flood story that dates back around 10000 BC. Also, there are so many unexplained mysteries especially in technological advancement of ancient people too. Aztec and Mayan ruins in Central and South America, Stonehenge in Europe, the pyramids in Africa, Machu Picchu in South East Asia. Even with today's technological advancement, such structures would prove too difficult to construct. The things we know no reach wetin we no know. Many scientific theories as per history are what they are...theories.

Amotolongbo:
Please be rational sir.
Pictorial evidence of what?

Lifeisgoody:
I posted a picture

Mufakirnaqdiun:

Nice try in not answering my question,lol.

Amotolongbo:
How does picture relate to your Noah myth please?

Lifeisgoody:
A clue

Mufakirnaqdiun:
Obob so people still believe in a myth plagiarized from earlier Mesopotamian myths, an area where disastrous floods are common.

To recap:
A world-wide flood is impossible.
A wooden boat that big is impossible.
A six-hundred year old man and his kids building that boat is even more impossible.

A six-hundred year old man…impossible.
Getting all the millions of species (some that can't even move!) together in a boat is impossible.

All of them reintroducing their species from just two each is biologically impossible.
And, really, any of them surviving in a world where literally every ecosystem on the planet is now gone, literally washed away, is impossible.

Oh, and an Omniscient, Omnipotent god who decides to destroy all life on the planet, but then changes his mind…impossible.
Really, literally nothing about the story is possible, nor makes the slightest bit of sense.
A world-wide flood would have left plenty of sedimentary evidence. Geologists have being digging into the earth for more than two hundred years, yet have found no sign of a world-wide flood, ever, let alone in the professed time period. It's also a sure bet that geologists have specifically looked for evidence of possible world-wide floods.

A world-wide flood would have contaminated all open fresh water reserves, including all lakes and rivers. This would have killed off all freshwater fish, but the fossil record does not support this.
When an exhaustive search has been undertaken and found no evidence, the lack of evidence is evidence. As well, deductive reasoning and common sense should count as evidence. For example, it's known that two specimens alone cannot resurrect a species.

Of course, this is just the tip of the iceberg as far as evidence for why it's safe to conclude that Noah's Ark is no more than a silly myth,let it go.

jesusjnr2020:
Genesis 8:4 (KJV)

And the ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat.

God bless.

https://m.jpost.com/archaeology/has-the-location-of-noahs-ark-finally-been-proven-using-3d-scans-680890/amp

https://answersingenesis.org/noahs-ark/noahs-ark-found/noahs-ark-mount-ararat/

jesusjnr2020:
Lol!

Even with pictorial evidence? Yet you could believe those said to taken from mars by scientists? Or have you been there before yourself?

This is obviously not about the Truth but the fact that you're passionately and obsessively opposed to the things of God.

So stop pretending that it has anything to do with Noah's ark.

https://answersingenesis.org/noahs-ark/noahs-ark-found/noahs-ark-mount-ararat/

https://m.jpost.com/archaeology/has-the-location-of-noahs-ark-finally-been-proven-using-3d-scans-680890/amp