ScrillyGOAT:


Nairalanders sha! Add-ons aren't calculated when referring to a players transfer fee.

Add-ons include :
- Number of matches played(what if he doesn't play up the stipulated amount of games e.g. Ross Barkley),
- Individual awards won by the player e.g. Eden Hazard. He can't even stay fit.

The list is long but I just stated this examples so you my friend will stop misleading people.

You forgot to add if the player wins a trophy with the team(which is possible for Liverpool), or if the player wins highest goal scorer award(which Nunez can), then you will cough out that money. So why did you reduce the price Liverpool payed to £65 million? U de shame to admit that you payed such Huge amount for him?

Benstino:


Nawaa o. No de write anything wey just enter Ur head nah. Even if it's not been long u started watching football, you still know a certain Cr7.

He's got 44 hattricks for Real Madrid
3 hattricks for Juventus and 3 for Manchester United

in the ucl

ELIJAHARMONICA7:

Wrong

In the ucl

killALIEN:

What site is that?

1xbet

This game looks fixed

Soso990240:
You clearly lack comprehension on the issue the guy raise. How can you offer Mane £170,000 while Salah is Earning £400,000? Mane and his agent requested for £300,000 and Liverpool refused. Yet Liverpool kept using him because they know how important of a player he is. They felt Bringing in Luiz Diaz will solve Mane problem, but now look at it

You forgot that Salah's wage was increased only after Mane left the club with a lot of stalling on Salah's contract. The truth is that Salah is better than Mane as evidenced from over the years.

Salah is having a dry run now, but it happens to every player even to Messi. And Liverpool injury woes is not helping matters too.

mattmogan88:



Manchester united don chop breakfast tire, which other breakfast are you talking about

Them chop another one abi dem no chop am…� Man U na team way I sabi dem no dae disappoint me

dochenaj:
You forgot that Salah's wage was increased only after Mane left the club with a lot of stalling on Salah's contract. The truth is that Salah is better than Mane as evidenced from over the years.

Salah is having a dry run now, but it happens to every player even to Messi. And Liverpool injury woes is not helping matters too.

I bet you still have a lot to learn about this game of football. You dont just wake up and sign a new contract. There must be negotiations before contracts can be signed. Mane left in June, Salah signed in July.. meaning that Liverpool never valued Mane. How can you say that Salah is a better footballer than Mane? Both had different work. Mane was more versatile, and a utility player, Mane was even used as a striker sometimes. Mane has won Premier league Golden boot just like Salah. Mane is always more visible in Games compared to Salah, who only functions as a RWF. Mane has always been the engine room of that attack. Watch this:
Virgil Van Dijk - £220,000
Thiago Alcántara do Nascimento - £200,000
Trent Alexander-Arnold - £180,000
Roberto Firmino - £180,000
Diogo Jota - £180,000
Fabinho Tavares - £180,000
Darwin Núñez - £179,423
Sadio Mane - £100,000.

Just look at that earning and be sincere to urself. All of una go just de form opinion, with no reasonable point.
Liverpool claim they are cutting weekly wages, why start with Mane? why did they still offer Salah £350,000 to £400,000 when they are cutting cost? Salah is 31, Mane is 30, Van Dirk is 31. And Liverpool could only offer Mane £175,000 while offering Salah £350,000.
It is better now that Mane is earning £345,000 per week
The point is that Klopp already made his plans to dump Mane if he ask for a pay rise above £170,000 , that was why they Signed Luiz Diaz.. But they have forgotten that Mane is Ten times a big game player compared to Diaz.
Klopp will live with his decision of comparing Luiz Diaz to Mane.

Offpoint1:

1xbet

Thaink you.

Shyboyk:


Them chop another one abi dem no chop am…� Man U na team way I sabi dem no dae disappoint me

Abeg shift .

Soso990240:
I bet you still have a lot to learn about this game of football. You dont just wake up and sign a new contract. There must be negotiations before contracts can be signed. Mane left in June, Salah signed in July.. meaning that Liverpool never valued Mane. How can you say that Salah is a better footballer than Mane? Both had different work. Mane was more versatile, and a utility player, Mane was even used as a striker sometimes. Mane has won Premier league Golden boot just like Salah. Mane is always more visible in Games compared to Salah, who only functions as a RWF. Mane has always been the engine room of that attack. Watch this:
Virgil Van Dijk - £220,000
Thiago Alcántara do Nascimento - £200,000
Trent Alexander-Arnold - £180,000
Roberto Firmino - £180,000
Diogo Jota - £180,000
Fabinho Tavares - £180,000
Darwin Núñez - £179,423
Sadio Mane - £100,000.

Just look at that earning and be sincere to urself. All of una go just de form opinion, with no reasonable point.
Liverpool claim they are cutting weekly wages, why start with Mane? why did they still offer Salah £350,000 to £400,000 when they are cutting cost? Salah is 31, Mane is 30, Van Dirk is 31. And Liverpool could only offer Mane £175,000 while offering Salah £350,000.
It is better now that Mane is earning £345,000 per week
The point is that Klopp already made his plans to dump Mane if he ask for a pay rise above £170,000 , that was why they Signed Luiz Diaz.. But they have forgotten that Mane is Ten times a big game player compared to Diaz.
Klopp will live with his decision of comparing Luiz Diaz to Mane.

That was very condescending.

You are entitled to your opinion as is every other person. But don't come here telling me how I don't know anything about football. When yourself is very myopic to see the big picture.

Soso990240:
You forgot to add if the player wins a trophy with the team(which is possible for Liverpool), or if the player wins highest goal scorer award(which Nunez can), then you will cough out that money. So why did you reduce the price Liverpool payed to £65 million? U de shame to admit that you payed such Huge amount for him?

It's an if situation. What if Liverpool doesn't win the league throughout his time here. I'm sure Timo Wener's transfer to Chelsea had the "win a league trophy" clause, but did it come to fruition. No.

mattmogan88:



Abeg shift .

No vex �

ScrillyGOAT:


It's an if situation. What if Liverpool doesn't win the league throughout his time here. I'm sure Timo Wener's transfer to Chelsea had the "win a league trophy" clause, but did it come to fruition. No.

I clearly stated the IF in question . Now that you mentioned Timo werner, dont forgot he won 3 major trophies with Chelsea including the Champions league. And we all know that the bigger the Trophy won, the higher the amount to be payed (if stated in the contract)

dochenaj:

That was very condescending.

You are entitled to your opinion as is every other person. But don't come here telling me how I don't know anything about football. When yourself is very myopic to see the big picture.

Sorry if you find my choice of words offensive, but i wrote because u were sounding like u never understood the situation. I hope the whole situation is clear to u now.