One of the strikes hit a hotel in downtown Kherson, where journalists were staying
MOSCOW, September 26. /TASS/. The third day of voting in referendums on joining Russia is over in the Lugansk and Donetsk People’s Republics (LPR, DPR), as well as in the Zaporozhye and Kherson regions. The referendums have been recognized as valid in the first three regions as voter turnout has passed 50%. The voting process continues amid shelling attacks by the Ukrainian military. TASS looks at the main developments in Ukraine and around it.

Special operation
A Russian strike killed about 100 mercenaries near the city of Zaporozhye, Russian Defense Ministry Spokesman Lieutenant General Igor Konashenkov told reporters on Sunday. Up to 300 foreign mercenaries were killed in a strike in the Nikolayev Region. The Russian Aerospace Forces downed two Ukrainian MiG-29 aircraft redesigned to carry the US-made HARM missiles. Russian artillery forces also prevented the Ukrainian army from launching an offensive towards the city of Maryinka in the DPR. In addition, Russian troops stopped the Ukrainian forces from attacking the Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant, intercepting eight kamikaze drones.

Shelling attacks
Some major shelling attacks took place during the referendums over the weekend. One of the strikes hit a hotel in downtown Kherson, where journalists were staying. The attack killed former Ukrainian lawmaker and active politician Alexey Zhuravko. Two members of a mobile election commission suffered wounds in the DPR.

Referendums in Donbass
The referendums in the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics have been recognized as valid as over 50% of voters have already cast their ballots. Voter turnout currently stands at 76.09% in the LPR and at 77.12% in the DPR. International observers told a briefing in Donetsk that the voting process was in line with all international principles. According to DPR leader Denis Pushilin, observers haven’t recorded any irregularities in the republic.

Referendums in Kherson and Zaporozhye regions
Voter turnout has reached 51.55% in the Zaporozhye Region (including votes cast overseas) and 48.91% in the Kherson Region. Foreign observers, including those from Serbia, Germany, France and Turkey, haven’t reported any irregularities during the plebiscites in the two regions so far.

Bills on liberated territories
The procedure on the accession of the liberated territories to Russia may take place on September 30, a source in the State Duma (the lower house of parliament) told TASS. He did not rule out that Russian President Vladimir Putin would take part in the accession ceremony.

Its complicating

Biafra is next inshallah

Perfect. Happy for them.


Wish them grace, mercy, love, peace and everything good from God.

Rest in peace to all those who have died in the process. Putin should have concentrated just on the East from the get-go. But bygone is bygone.

Cities Russian Nukes will land and level New York, Washington, Los Angeles, London,Berlin, and Paris

ayoisblack:
One of the strikes hit a hotel in downtown Kherson, where journalists were staying
MOSCOW, September 26. /TASS/. The third day of voting in referendums on joining Russia is over in the Lugansk and Donetsk People’s Republics (LPR, DPR), as well as in the Zaporozhye and Kherson regions. The referendums have been recognized as valid in the first three regions as voter turnout has passed 50%. The voting process continues amid shelling attacks by the Ukrainian military. TASS looks at the main developments in Ukraine and around it.

Special operation
A Russian strike killed about 100 mercenaries near the city of Zaporozhye, Russian Defense Ministry Spokesman Lieutenant General Igor Konashenkov told reporters on Sunday. Up to 300 foreign mercenaries were killed in a strike in the Nikolayev Region. The Russian Aerospace Forces downed two Ukrainian MiG-29 aircraft redesigned to carry the US-made HARM missiles. Russian artillery forces also prevented the Ukrainian army from launching an offensive towards the city of Maryinka in the DPR. In addition, Russian troops stopped the Ukrainian forces from attacking the Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant, intercepting eight kamikaze drones.

Shelling attacks
Some major shelling attacks took place during the referendums over the weekend. One of the strikes hit a hotel in downtown Kherson, where journalists were staying. The attack killed former Ukrainian lawmaker and active politician Alexey Zhuravko. Two members of a mobile election commission suffered wounds in the DPR.

Referendums in Donbass
The referendums in the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics have been recognized as valid as over 50% of voters have already cast their ballots. Voter turnout currently stands at 76.09% in the LPR and at 77.12% in the DPR. International observers told a briefing in Donetsk that the voting process was in line with all international principles. According to DPR leader Denis Pushilin, observers haven’t recorded any irregularities in the republic.

Referendums in Kherson and Zaporozhye regions
Voter turnout has reached 51.55% in the Zaporozhye Region (including votes cast overseas) and 48.91% in the Kherson Region. Foreign observers, including those from Serbia, Germany, France and Turkey, haven’t reported any irregularities during the plebiscites in the two regions so far.

Bills on liberated territories
The procedure on the accession of the liberated territories to Russia may take place on September 30, a source in the State Duma (the lower house of parliament) told TASS. He did not rule out that Russian President Vladimir Putin would take part in the accession ceremony.

Null and void ab initio

Mrtaye:

Null and void ab initio

Real and genuine 'democracy' is respecting the rights of people to choose.
The people have spoken, they spoke loud and clear and the world heard them.
They came out and voted enmasse.
The amalgamation of Northern and Southern Nigeria by colonialists is technically null and void(the people never chose that, the colonialist masters did).

ayoisblack:

Real and genuine 'democracy' is respecting the rights of people to choose.
The people have spoken, they spoke loud and clear and the world heard them.
They came out and voted enmasse.
The amalgamation of Northern and Southern Nigeria by colonialists is technically null and void(the people never chose that, the colonialist masters did).

It shouldn't be initiated or instigated by Russia on Ukrainian territory or are you telling me that Ukraine can organize such referendum in the break away parts of Russia which Kremlin has been repressing?

Mrtaye:

It shouldn't be initiated or instigated by Russia on Ukrainian territory or are you telling me that Ukraine can organize such referendum in the break away parts of Russia which Kremlin has been repressing?

Russia can and will continue to do such in appropriate place...
Afterall NATO started it with Kosovo..

BentizilL:

Russia can and will continue to do such in appropriate place...
Afterall NATO started it with Kosovo..

God bless you.

BentizilL:

Russia can and will continue to do such in appropriate place...
Afterall NATO started it with Kosovo..

Lolz NATO is an organization of liberal countries and the decision is a multilateral one which was after due observation and consultation with the United Nations and international community carried along in order to balance the situation,so you bringing NATO issue shows that your point is not tenable afterall....you refused to answer my question!!! Will Russia allow a referendum in it's territory by Ukraine?

I think it's really messed up if Ukraine is continuing to shell and cause civilian casualties in spite of knowing that there are civilians there to participate in the referendums. I just came across a site with horrible pictures of residents of the Donetsk People’s Republic who were brutally killed by shelling. I want to post the pictures, but I'm not sure if they would be considered too graphic for this forum and in violation of the rules.

Mrtaye:

Lolz NATO is an organization of liberal countries and the decision is a multilateral one which was after due observation and consultation with the United Nations and international community carried along in order to balance the situation,so you bringing NATO issue shows that your point is not tenable afterall....you refused to answer my question!!! Will Russia allow a referendum in it's territory by Ukraine?

The people of today's Southern Cameroon became Cameroonians through a refrendrum.
They were restricted to either joining British colonized Nigeria or French colonized Cameroon.
Who gave the West the right/monopoly to violate the territorial integrity and carve out borders for those they considered inferior?
The amalgamation of Northern and Southern Nigeria by the invading barbarians from a barren land (devoid of human & natural resources) has no valid legal foundation (the people were not consulted).
The same legalities that validated the aforementioned cameroonian refrendrum validates the Donbass refrendrum.
The destabilization of Libya has led to an influx of arms across the Nigerian porous borders and today they're used to terrorize innocent Nigerian citizens.
NATO is a terrorist organization that has been known to leave sorrows, tears and blood as their trade mark in everything they touch.

Who gave NATO the right to invade Libya?
How's Libya today?
The destabilization of Libya has led to an influx of arms across the Nigerian porous borders and today they're used to terrorize innocent Nigerian citizens.
NATO is a terrorist organization that has been known to leave sorrows, tears and blood as their trade mark in everything they touch.

These regions are forever gone, even Adolf Hilter no fit reclaim am….. make all of una come back after the process don finish.

If na una no scream “War Crimes” i no go watch ball again

Teaser4:
These regions are forever gone, even Adolf Hilter no fit reclaim am….. make all of una come back after the process don finish.

If na una no scream “War Crimes” i no go watch ball again

ayoisblack:

The people of today's Southern Cameroon became Cameroonians through a refrendrum.
They were restricted to either joining British colonized Nigeria or French colonized Cameroon.
Who gave the West the right/monopoly to violate the territorial integrity and carve out borders for those they considered inferior?
The amalgamation of Northern and Southern Nigeria by the invading barbarians from a barren land (devoid of human & natural resources) has no valid legal foundation (the people were not consulted).
The same legalities that validated the aforementioned cameroonian refrendrum validates the Donbass refrendrum.
The destabilization of Libya has led to an influx of arms across the Nigerian porous borders and today they're used to terrorize innocent Nigerian citizens.
NATO is a terrorist organization that has been known to leave sorrows, tears and blood as their trade mark in everything they touch.

Mr Man stop misinforming people because of your own personal interest,the ICJ ruled that bakassi peninsula should be ceded to Cameroon and Nigeria obliged okay....all the other stories you are bringing highlights my reason that you have a personal beef against the West shikena

Mrtaye:

Mr Man stop misinforming people because of your own personal interest,the ICJ ruled that bakassi peninsula should be ceded to Cameroon and Nigeria obliged okay....all the other stories you are bringing highlights my reason that you have a personal beef against the West shikena

The fact that you have a very shallow understanding of history doesn't make facts misinformation.
A simple internet search would have saved you this embarrassment.
The ICJ ruling you cited is unrelated to the refrendrum I referenced.
A referendum was held in British Cameroons on 11 February 1961 to determine whether the territory should join neighbouring Cameroon or Nigeria. The option of independence was not on the ballot, having been opposed by Andrew Cohen, the UK representative to the UN Trusteeship Council.

Bakassi is a peninsula on the Gulf of Guinea. It lies between the Cross River estuary, near the city of Calabar and the Rio del Ray estuary on the east. It is governed by Cameroon, following the transfer of sovereignty from neighbouring Nigeria as a result of a judgment by the International Court of Justice.[1] On 22 November 2007, the Nigerian Senate rejected the transfer, since the Greentree Agreement ceding the area to Cameroon was contrary to Section 12(1) of the 1999 Constitution.[2] Regardless, the territory was completely ceded to Cameroon on 14 August 2008, exactly two years after the first part of it was transferred.

Nigeria and Cameroon have disputed the possession of Bakassi for some years[quantify], leading to considerable tension between the two countries. In 1981 the two countries went to the brink of war over Bakassi and another area around Lake Chad, at the other end of the two countries' common border. More armed clashes broke out in the early 1990s. In response, Cameroon took the matter to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on 29 March 1994.

ICJ verdict
The ICJ delivered its judgment on 10 October 2002, finding (based principally on the Anglo-German agreements) that sovereignty over Bakassi did indeed rest with Cameroon. It instructed Nigeria to transfer possession of the peninsula, but did not require the inhabitants to move or to change their nationality. Cameroon was thus given a substantial Nigerian population and was required to protect their rights, infrastructure and welfare.

In 1994 Cameroon went to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to avoid war with Nigeria after many armed clashes occurred in the disputed regions. Eight years later the ICJ ruled in Cameroon's favour and confirmed the 1913 border made by the British and Germans as the international border between the two countries. Nigeria confirmed it would transfer Bakassi to Cameroon.

The referendum in the Donbass was monitored and applauded by the President of BRICS (a coalition of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. They jointly constitute a majority of the global population), this further lends credence to the legality of the of Donbass refrendrum.

Why didn't NATO take Gaddafi to the ICJ instead of invading Libya?
Have the US/West/NATO been charged for war crimes in Iraq at the ICJ?

ayoisblack:

The fact that you have a very shallow understanding of history doesn't make facts misinformation.
A simple internet search would have saved you this embarrassment.
The ICJ ruling you cited is unrelated to the refrendrum I referenced.
The referendum in the Donbass was monitored and applauded by the President of BRICS (a coalition of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. They jointly constitute a majority of the global population), this further lends credence to the legality of the of Donbass refrendrum.

Oga you are the olodo because the referendum you were talking about is in Cameroon and within the territory of Cameroon without external interference or interest or in your own history did Nigeria invade Cameroon to organize referendum for southern Cameroon?

Mrtaye:

Oga you are the olodo because the referendum you were talking about is in Cameroon and within the territory of Cameroon without external interference or interest or in your own history did Nigeria invade Cameroon to organize referendum for southern Cameroon?

But you just implied it didn't exist?
You called it misinformation, I countered with facts and evidence and you had no choice but to contradict yourself. Yet I'm the olodo?

Me: The people of today's Southern Cameroon became Cameroonians through a refrendrum.

You: Mr Man stop misinforming people because of your own personal interest,the ICJ ruled that bakassi peninsula should be ceded to Cameroon and Nigeria obliged okay....all the other stories you are bringing highlights my reason that you have a personal beef against the West shikena

Me: The fact that you have a very shallow understanding of history doesn't make facts misinformation.
A simple internet search would have saved you this embarrassment.
The ICJ ruling you cited is unrelated to the refrendrum I referenced.
(Provided evidence)

You: Oga you are the olodo because the referendum you were talking about is in Cameroon and within the territory of Cameroon without external interference or interest or in your own history did Nigeria invade Cameroon to organize referendum for southern Cameroon?

You can't keep your narrative straight, you make contradictory and incoherent statements and you're inconsistent.

In addition,
This statement you made is misleading.
"the refrendrum you were talking about is in Cameroon and within the territory of Cameroon without external interference"
May I remind you that they were two distinct Cameroons; French Cameroon and British Cameroon a.k.a South Cameroon (two different colonies/territories that were later integrated to give birth to today's Cameroon)

ayoisblack:

But you just implied it didn't exist?
You called it misinformation, I countered with facts and evidence and you had no choice but to contradict yourself. Yet I'm the olodo?

Me: The people of today's Southern Cameroon became Cameroonians through a refrendrum.

You: Mr Man stop misinforming people because of your own personal interest,the ICJ ruled that bakassi peninsula should be ceded to Cameroon and Nigeria obliged okay....all the other stories you are bringing highlights my reason that you have a personal beef against the West shikena

Me: The fact that you have a very shallow understanding of history doesn't make facts misinformation.
A simple internet search would have saved you this embarrassment.
The ICJ ruling you cited is unrelated to the refrendrum I referenced.
(Provided evidence)

You: Oga you are the olodo because the referendum you were talking about is in Cameroon and within the territory of Cameroon without external interference or interest or in your own history did Nigeria invade Cameroon to organize referendum for southern Cameroon?

You can't keep your narrative straight, you make contradictory and incoherent statements and you're inconsistent.

In addition,
This statement you made is misleading.
"the refrendrum you were talking about is in Cameroon and within the territory of Cameroon without external interference"
May I remind you that they were two distinct Cameroons; French Cameroon and British Cameroon a.k.a South Cameroon (two different colonies/territories that were later integrated to give birth to today's Cameroon)

You Russia apologists always shift goal post and sounding vague by doing that but I don't need to spoon feed you because your mind is zeroed to "mother Russia".....but answer my question did Nigeria also invade Cameroon to force a referendum yes or no

Mrtaye:

You Russia apologists always shift goal post and sounding vague by doing that but I don't need to spoon feed you because your mind is zeroed to "mother Russia".....but answer my question did Nigeria also invade Cameroon to force a referendum yes or no

Yes I'm a Russian apologist, but I'm focused on facts.
Why did you switch positions on the Cameroon refrendrum?
You implied it never existed and you falsely claimed I had been misleading until evidence surfaced.
Now, you're shifting the goal post and deflecting attention away from your ignorance.
Why not get your facts straight before spewing nonsense and passing it as credible information.
In addition, Nigeria cannot be recognized as a legal entity given that the amalgamation of Southern and Northern Nigeria was done by the colonialist/invaders. (If we're using the same yardstick of justice on the legality of the integration/amalgamation of the Donbass with Russia).

ayoisblack:

Yes I'm a Russian apologist, but I'm focused on facts.
Why did you switch positions on the Cameroon refrendrum?
You implied it never existed and you falsely claimed I had been misleading until evidence surfaced.
Now, you're shifting the goal post and deflecting attention away from your ignorance.
Why not get your facts straight before spewing nonsense and passing it as credible information.
In addition, Nigeria cannot be recognized as a legal entity given that the amalgamation of Southern and Northern Nigeria was done by the colonialist/invaders. (If we're using the same yardstick of justice on the legality of the integration/amalgamation of the Donbass with Russia).

I don't switch position cos I already have my own alignment to the liberal west but the issue is that despotic Russia always want to align with the rule of law that doesn't exist in mother Russia.....
Back to my question did Nigeria invade Cameroon to impose referendum?

Nigeria cannot be recognized as a legal entity given that the amalgamation of Southern and Northern Nigeria was done by the colonialist/invaders. (If we're using the same yardstick of justice on the legality of the integration/amalgamation of the Donbass with Russia).
This invalidates the goal post shifting question you asked me.
No further comments from me because you're unintelligent, a liar, uneducated, childish and not worth it.
Implying the refrendrum didn't exist and admitting it existed in the light of easily obtainable evidence is switching positions.

Mrtaye:

I don't switch position cos I already have my own alignment to the liberal west but the issue is that despotic Russia always want to align with the rule of law that doesn't exist in mother Russia.....
Back to my question did Nigeria invade Cameroon to impose referendum?

Nigeria cannot be recognized as a legal entity given that the amalgamation of Southern and Northern Nigeria was done by the colonialist/invaders (If we're using the same yardstick of justice on the legality of the integration/amalgamation of the Donbass with Russia).
This invalidates the goal post shifting question you asked me.
Implying the refrendrum didn't exist and admitting it existed in the light of easily obtainable evidence is switching positions.
No further comments because you're unintelligent, a liar, uneducated, childish and not worth it.

ayoisblack:

Nigeria cannot be recognized as a legal entity given that the amalgamation of Southern and Northern Nigeria was done by the colonialist/invaders (If we're using the same yardstick of justice on the legality of the integration/amalgamation of the Donbass with Russia).
This invalidates the goal post shifting question you asked me.
Implying the refrendrum didn't exist and admitting it existed in the light of easily obtainable evidence is switching positions.
No further comments because you're unintelligent, a liar, uneducated, childish and not worth it.

Lolz Nigeria is not a legal entity in your dreams and imagination but don't kill yourself there is nothing you can do about it okay...I also know your region from your write up and I can confidently say that you are from the east..but answer my question did Nigeria invade Cameroon

Mrtaye:

Lolz Nigeria is not a legal entity in your dreams and imagination but don't kill yourself there is nothing you can do about it okay...I also know your region from your write up and I can confidently say that you are from the east..but answer my question did Nigeria invade Cameroon

Nigeria is not a legal entity and Nigeria CANNOT be considered/recognized to be a legal entity are two different statements.
Nigeria cannot be considered to be a legal entity because the amalgamation of Southern and Northern Nigeria was done by invaders/colonizers (by virtue of the opinion you've expressed, that amalgamation would be null and void).
No, the refrendrum in British Cameroon was engineered and conducted by the Western colonizers, not Nigeria.

ayoisblack:

Nigeria is not a legal entity and Nigeria CANNOT be considered/recognized to be a legal entity are two different statements.
Nigeria cannot be considered to be a legal entity because the amalgamation of Southern and Northern Nigeria was done by invaders/colonizers (by virtue of the opinion you've expressed, that amalgamation would be null and void).
No, the refrendrum in British Cameroon was engineered and conducted by the Western colonizers, not Nigeria.

I guessed your origin right and you also proved me right,I hereby rest my case

Mrtaye:

It shouldn't be initiated or instigated by Russia on Ukrainian territory or are you telling me that Ukraine can organize such referendum in the break away parts of Russia which Kremlin has been repressing?

See the problem
These people has been asking for this referendum from ukraine for 8years but rather they got butchered and massacred!! Putin is but their savior, and Putin didn’t instigate the referendum, the people asked for it!!

DerrickzB:


See the problem
These people has been asking for this referendum from ukraine for 8years but rather they got butchered and massacred!! Putin is but their savior, and Putin didn’t instigate the referendum, the people asked for it!!

Ok what about those being oppressed on Russia that Putin is silencing,can Ukraine also be their savior by organising a referendum for them and also will Russia allow

It’s calm today so far…it’s the last day of the referendum.

Mrtaye:

Lolz NATO is an organization of liberal countries and the decision is a multilateral one which was after due observation and consultation with the United Nations and international community carried along in order to balance the situation,so you bringing NATO issue shows that your point is not tenable afterall....you refused to answer my question!!! Will Russia allow a referendum in it's territory by Ukraine?

Why do you lie so much? NATO countries like Spain Greece etc doesn't even recognize Kosovo, UN doesn't recognize Kosovo. Just don't be plain stupid.