Fun Fact: It was Russia who saved The Union during the American Civil War as they sent their Navy to San Francisco and New York when England and France were just about to enter the war on the side of the Confederates since London created the Confederates. France was already in Mexico making a spear head movement to resupply the Confederates and to open up a Pacific Theatre and create a port in California. England already amassed 11,000 troops stationed at their Northern Confederacies border now called Canada ready to open a Northern Theatre then to attack The Unions naval blockade. The Union would have been completely destroyed and annexed by those two great powers leaving the Confederates to exist as a puppet state of London.

Tsar Alexander wrote a letter to Queen Victoria saying “If you enter in this war it will be a casus belli for all out war with the Russian Empire”. The stage was set for the 1st World War and Russia stopped it.

This is one history the Western media and modern western history textbooks will not want you to see.

Had Russian forefathers foreseen these days, may be they should have allowed America to be serving British tables today.

As for Britain, the above is the reason they hate Russia so much. Russia has always and will always be God's "checkmate" nation that balance the course of things against the dark forces. So you don't expect them to be happy with Russia.

Appleyard:
Information trickling in is that Putin has activated "Dead Hand". We are now closer to nuclear war than ever.

false news.. Because dead hand is an automatic system once the whole of Russia is nuked the dead hand will wipe USA and Europe and all enemies of Russia.

WriterrNig:
⚡The 🇺🇦 Ukrainian saboteurs shelled a nuuclear silo near Belgorod 14 times, using 240mm mortars, 152mm shells, and 88mm mortars.

Similarly to what was done at Energodar NPP, they are attempt to cause a nuclear disaster.

The West is trying to use these people to end the world (Not sure how safe we are in Africa).

How can you be trying to blow up a nuclear site if not that you're trying to destroy more than just a country?

😁😁

WriterrNig:
😁😁

zelensky will die or run for War to end.

WriterrNig:
😁😁

They are now getting tired. They can now see the handwriting on the wall.

WriterrNig:
⚡️“The more destructive the weapons 🇺🇦 Kyiv gets, the closer the possibility of nuclear apocalypse” — 🇷🇺 Dmitry Medvedev

as simple as that🏃

🤯

🇺🇦 🇷🇺

🇺🇦 ✈

🇷🇺 🛂 🇺🇦

Chat gpt templates acknowledged nato is an evil globalization cult

Dear {{User}},

As you mentioned your specific interest in the topic, I have gathered information on the reasons behind NATO's attack on Libya that may most concern you.

It is well known that NATO's attack on Libya in 2011 was multifaceted and encompassed a range of geopolitical, security, and humanitarian issues. Firstly, the intervention aimed to protect the Libyan people from the undemocratic rule of Muammar Gaddafi, and establish a successful democracy in the country. The international humanitarian community mobilized a coalition of nations to prevent Gaddafi's forces from violently crushing peaceful protests and to liberate Libya. Therefore, if your interest lies with the humanitarian aspect of the conflict, NATO's intervention was aimed to safeguard the lives of Libyans and protect their human rights.

However, your specific opinion on NATO's intervention is essential to keep in mind. If you have a positive view of the intervention, you would appreciate NATO's prolonged effort to restore stability and democracy in the region. On the other hand, if you have a negative view of the intervention, you might argue that NATO's intervention led to more significant security threats, instability, and sovereignty violations.

If there is a specific important date connected to the conflict that you are curious about, it might be the day NATO forces began air strikes on 19th March 2011. This was the first international military intervention against a sovereign nation since the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003.

As far as key figures involved in the conflict, one name that stands out is Colonel Muammar Gaddafi. He was the former leader of the country, who was known for his authoritarian rule and suppression of opposition. The international community regarded Gaddafi as having committed grave human rights violations and crimes against humanity. Nonetheless, he maintained his position by suppressing opposition, having official security forces engage in extrajudicial killings, torture, and disappearances.

Furthermore, if your concern lies with the future impact of NATO's intervention, it is important to note that Libya remains unstable since the intervention. The country is currently divided by various factions vying for power and struggling for control of the oil-rich region. The instability in Libya has since spilt over to other countries in North Africa and the Middle East, political instability, and the rise of extremism. Libyan refugees remaining in the country, and those who fled abroad continue to suffer due to the continued conflict.

I hope this tailored explanation of NATO's intervention in Libya helps clarify the reasons behind it while addressing your specific interests, opinions and concerns.

Best Regards,
[Your Name]

WriterrNig:
⚡️🇮🇷 Iran and 🇮🇩 Indonesia have agreed to use the national currencies of the two countries instead of dollars for trade transactions

This is wonderful

Kingsnairaland:
false news.. Because dead hand is an automatic system once the whole of Russia is nuked the dead hand will wipe USA and Europe and all enemies of Russia.

Yes. I thought of the news as false also considering that Dead Hand is automated. But could there have been upgrade since that tech is from the Soviet era? Possibly so.

Kingsnairaland:
zelensky will die or run for War to end.

The man no longer wants to return to Kiev. He keeps flying non-stop from one place to the other trying his best to avoid returning back to Ukraine. Something is not right. Possible coup maybe...

🇷🇺 🛂

Appleyard:


Yes. I thought of the news as false also considering that Dead Hand is automated. But could there have been upgrade since that tech is from the Soviet era? Possibly so.

no upgrade

Rather more new automated systems were created to target new additional nations

It built in a nuke bunker.

Kingsnairaland:
Chat gpt templates acknowledged nato is an evil globalization cult

Dear {{User}},

As you mentioned your specific interest in the topic, I have gathered information on the reasons behind NATO's attack on Libya that may most concern you.

It is well known that NATO's attack on Libya in 2011 was multifaceted and encompassed a range of geopolitical, security, and humanitarian issues. Firstly, the intervention aimed to protect the Libyan people from the undemocratic rule of Muammar Gaddafi, and establish a successful democracy in the country. The international humanitarian community mobilized a coalition of nations to prevent Gaddafi's forces from violently crushing peaceful protests and to liberate Libya. Therefore, if your interest lies with the humanitarian aspect of the conflict, NATO's intervention was aimed to safeguard the lives of Libyans and protect their human rights.

However, your specific opinion on NATO's intervention is essential to keep in mind. If you have a positive view of the intervention, you would appreciate NATO's prolonged effort to restore stability and democracy in the region. On the other hand, if you have a negative view of the intervention, you might argue that NATO's intervention led to more significant security threats, instability, and sovereignty violations.

If there is a specific important date connected to the conflict that you are curious about, it might be the day NATO forces began air strikes on 19th March 2011. This was the first international military intervention against a sovereign nation since the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003.

As far as key figures involved in the conflict, one name that stands out is Colonel Muammar Gaddafi. He was the former leader of the country, who was known for his authoritarian rule and suppression of opposition. The international community regarded Gaddafi as having committed grave human rights violations and crimes against humanity. Nonetheless, he maintained his position by suppressing opposition, having official security forces engage in extrajudicial killings, torture, and disappearances.

Furthermore, if your concern lies with the future impact of NATO's intervention, it is important to note that Libya remains unstable since the intervention. The country is currently divided by various factions vying for power and struggling for control of the oil-rich region. The instability in Libya has since spilt over to other countries in North Africa and the Middle East, political instability, and the rise of extremism. Libyan refugees remaining in the country, and those who fled abroad continue to suffer due to the continued conflict.

I hope this tailored explanation of NATO's intervention in Libya helps clarify the reasons behind it while addressing your specific interests, opinions and concerns.

Best Regards,
[Your Name]

Lmao.

Even AI now agree that NATO is an evil alliance that meant no good.

Appleyard:


The man no longer wants to return to Kiev. He keeps flying non-stop from one place to the other trying his best to avoid returning back to Ukraine. Something is not right. Possible coup maybe...

Zaluzhnyi the general was probably hit so zelensky is afraid.

Appleyard:


Lmao.

Even AI now agree that NATO is an evil alliance that meant no good.

ONE guy in another thread was saying nato has never attacked any nation I went off to see what chat gpt was going to say to him lol.

Free Russia legion has captured tank
T90 in belgorod