Johnnyessence:
let me see their press statement on that. Without posting Inec signed press release on that, you are just a clueless propagandist. Inec , Pdp and Ademola Nurudeen Jackson Adeleke will filed their case in the Appeal court of justice. Odi Aye Atunwa fun ijoba Oyetola ni ipinle Osun

Misterone:
INEC has said they will not appeal the judgement. Appeal court is not a retrial court, no new evidence is introduced at this stage. It is a court to check if the judgement conforms with the laws of the land.

Osun Tribunal Judgement: INEC, Adeleke head to Appeal Court...

Johnnyessence:
Ismail omipidan the clueless press Secretary to Oyetola lies and propaganda are Siamese twins. Awon ole oni ro jati jati

Did you read the write up at all? Or are you just a making noise for nothing?

BVAS is a game changer! Adeleke should go and restBVAS is a game changer! Adeleke should go and rest...

NothingDoMe:
Looks clownish. Anyway he goes to higher courts. Wish him luck.

. Sure!

jahsharon:


Did you read the write up at all? Or are you just a making noise for nothing?

your thinking is beyond redemption, what do you want that clueless loser and useless propagandist iropidan will say. Awon ole jati jati gbogbo. Ka da fun gbogbo won lapapo.


Oyetola will lose both in Appeal court and Supreme Court of justice



Few points on this judgement:

1. The first report given to APC actually showed over-voting in more than 700 polling units. It is actually around 1500 polling units or thereabout including units APC won. Therefore, the alleged over-voting is widespread although APC based their petition on units they lost (700). This was alluded to in the minority judgement. Therefore, it is not restricted to where PDP won.

2. The second report given to PDP was better but was also showing over-voting in some units as well. The majority ruling of the tribunal claimed that INEC colluded with PDP in the pendency of the petition by APC to produce the second reports. However, this argument is puerile at best by two reasons (a) PDP is entitled to ask for the same forms/reports given to APC to defend the petition and can only ask for it in the pendency of the petition. Why would the winner of election ask for BVAS report? PDP won the election. They asked for the report after studying the petition of APC.

(b) The second BVAS report cannot be said to be tampered with because it still showed over-voting as claimed by APC although in less polling units across the state.

3. The two reports are contradictory leaving the PDP to then ask for physical inspection of the BVAS machines. At least the reports are generated by BVAS machines. The BVAS machines were brought to the open court and inspected and the data there correspond with the election results. Now, there were three evidences. 2 BVAS reports (printed from server, mind you) and one physical reports of the BVAS machines in the open court. In fact the two BVAS reports are not in tandem with the results of the physical inspection of the BVAS machines. The majority ruling decided to go with first BVAS report, neglecting 2nd BVAS validly given to PDP and the data on the BVAS itself.

4. In the majority judgement, the judge harped heavily and compared the veracity of the two BVAS reports. He said the 2nd BVAS report is doctored. Okay, but what of the BVAS machines itself? Is it also doctored? The tribunal gave permission to inspect the machines by the two parties and everyone in court saw there was no over-voting in BVAS machines but the tribunal didn't even take a position on the results of BVAS inspection in their ruling.

5. The tribunal didn't dabble into whether the results of BVAS machines inspection are accurate or tampered with as well. The question is, are BVAS machines tampered with as well? I will answer in negative by two reasons:

(a) we learned that only the chairman of INEC and director of ICT can have access to data stored on the BVAS machines. Even one of them cannot access the machines data without the cooperation of other. We all know that immediately after election and after tribunal started sitting, the BVAS machines were housed in the tribunal and not with INEC in Osogbo.

(b) The second reason why I believe that the machines were not tampered with was because the inspection of the machines showed over-voting in 6 units. If INEC had tampered with it, no polling units will report over-voting.

5. There were 3 members of the tribunal. The chairman wrote the leading judgment and other member wrote minority judgement. The third member of the panel did not agree with either the majority or minority judgements in the open court. After reading of the judgment by the chairman, the third member only greeted people and say goodbye. No concurrence or otherwise. I dare to say there is no judgement of that tribunal.

In conclusion, I believe the fight is actually against BVAS machines to erode the confidence of people on the machines or INEC and bring apathy in the forthcoming general election. Everybody should endeavour to get their PVC and vote wisely. Your vote will count.

pavoda:
You come on the internent and show your Cluelessness. Asking informed people with articulate views that you cant counter to go and read..

who ever u are u know next to nothing. This is not your usual tribunal to appeal to supreme case . Go and meet the elders in your family that reads journals to explain to you . Cus I can’t be explaining a simple thing to you. It will seem complex cus ur brain can’t carry . I will refer u to your father.

Kennyfancy:
They are questioning Adeleke certificate but keep mute when we talk about Tinubu certificate, Nigeria is funny

You're comparing Adelek F9 student with Tinubu who graduate with DISTINCTION from Chicago State University?

Your brain is paining you sir.

Johnnyessence:
uzodima back door to government house will be resisted and rejected by the Apex court sitting on Ademola Nurudeen Jackson Adeleke’s Appeal. Odi Aye Atunwa fun ijoba Oyetola ni ipinle Osun.

Well, let's see if the Appeal Court will order for a rerun or not

Taiggarr:

Obviously..

Kid what's ever satisfy u

Johnnyessence:
it wasn’t the full synchronisation reports, instead of APC to get their synchronisation reports of Bvas after 30 days, nope they quickly go to Inec office to get their synchronisation reports after 7 days of the election. Infact Appeal court of justice will overturned the black market judgement from the tribunal. Appeal Court justices will based their judgement on the 30 days Bvas synchronisation reports Inec did after the election. APC and Oyetola will be the one to lose the Appeal case after the justices listened to Inec counsel and its 30 days synchronisation reports. Appeal Court of justice will do the needful by affirming the victories of Senator Ademola Nurudeen Jackson Adeleke as the 6th governor of Osun State.

Why can't INEC declare Adeleke the winner after synchronising?

Johnnyessence:
clueless APC supporter, odi Aye Atunwa fun ijoba Oyetola ni ipinle Osun

Lol. EYAH WE UNDERSTAND YOUR OUT CRY BUT IT IS TOO LATE TO CRY.

If you're open to understanding and gaining knowledge, I suggest revisiting the New Electoral Act 2022. In contrast to the Electoral Act 2010, Gubernatorial Elections Petition cases no longer conclude at the Court of Appeal but can extend to the Supreme Court. It appears you may be mixing up the provisions of these two statutes.

victorsola:
who ever u are u know next to nothing. This is not your usual tribunal to appeal to supreme case . Go and meet the elders in your family that reads journals to explain to you . Cus I can’t be explaining a simple thing to you. It will seem complex cus ur brain can’t carry . I will refer u to your father.

Softmirror:


Lol. EYAH WE UNDERSTAND YOUR OUT CRY BUT IT IS TOO LATE TO CRY.

you will cry well this month when Atiku Abubakar of Pdp wins February 25th presidential poll in landslide victories. Atiku Abubakar everywhere you go