Lizzysamuel:
*Labour Party and Peter Obi v. INEC

SUMMARY OF ORDER*

1. Court refused to vary the previous order by the court in favour Inec so previous order stands.

2. Court allowed for Inec to re-configure Bvas provided all data is save on a secured backend server before the next Election and must give access to Labour party. (Emphasis on "which cannot be tempered with"

3. The court also ordered INEC to allow the Applicants to inspect and carry out digital forensic examination of all the electoral materials used in the conduct of the elections, as well as to avail them the Certified True Copies, of result of the physical inspection of the BVAS.

Lizzysamuel:
*Labour Party and Peter Obi v. INEC

SUMMARY OF ORDER*

1. Court refused to vary the previous order that Labour Party be granted access to Election materials in favour INEC. (So previous order stands).

2. Court allowed for INEC to re-configure Bvas provided all data is saved on a secured backend server before the next Election and must give access to Labour party. (Emphasis on "which cannot be tempered with"

3. The court also ordered INEC to allow the Applicants to inspect and carry out digital forensic examination of all the electoral materials used in the conduct of the elections, as well as to avail them the Certified True Copies, of result of the physical inspection of the BVAS.

4. The INEC deposed in their affidavit that the accreditation data will not be tampered with.

tinsel:
Obi requested only one thing- stop INEC from reconfiguring the machines. And the court ruled one thing- refused his request.
Obidients can interprete the ruling to massage their ego any way they like.

tinsel:
Obi requested only one thing- stop INEC from reconfiguring the machines. And the court ruled one thing- refused his request.
Obidients can interprete the ruling to massage their ego any way they like.

Lizzysamuel:


You are a real dumbo.

Court granted Obi request to access INEC materials.

iNEC ran to court for that to be vacated on prayer for reconfiguration.

LP returned to court to counter that.

Court decided to give a win win situation.

How old are you again?

tinsel:
Obi requested only one thing- stop INEC from reconfiguring the machines. And the court ruled one thing- refused his request.
Obidients can interprete the ruling to massage their ego any way they like.

tinsel:
Reporting falsehood to massage your ego.

LordTheus:


INEC requested only one thing- for the court to vacate Obi's request to inspect election materials under the excuse of reconfiguration. And the court ruled against that and instead reiterated that Obi and Atiku are allowed to inspect the BVAS nevertheless. Urchins can interprete the ruling to massage their ego any way they like.

JAMO84:
Obi always making useless noise and heating up the polity. Certified true copy of BVAS report that Oyetola got without making noise, Onitsha Nelson Mandela had to go to court to get it.

MrSegunAdewole:
leave the dumb bastard to be wallowing in his deceit

Lizzysamuel:


You are a real dumbo.

Court granted Obi request to access INEC materials.

iNEC ran to court for that to be vacated on prayer for reconfiguration.

LP returned to court to counter that.

Court decided to give a win win situation.

How old are you again?

Lizzysamuel:
*Labour Party and Peter Obi v. INEC

SUMMARY OF ORDER*

1. Court refused to vary the previous order that Labour Party be granted access to Election materials in favour INEC. (So previous order stands).

2. Court allowed for INEC to re-configure Bvas provided all data is saved on a secured backend server before the next Election and must give access to Labour party. (Emphasis on "which cannot be tempered with"

3. The court also ordered INEC to allow the Applicants to inspect and carry out digital forensic examination of all the electoral materials used in the conduct of the elections, as well as to avail them the Certified True Copies, of result of the physical inspection of the BVAS.

4. The INEC deposed in their affidavit that the accreditation data will not be tampered with.

Buckeyemedia1:
I give one thing to Obidients, they sure know how to deceive themselves since their days of Nnamdi Kanu & ipob.

tinsel:
Obi requested only one thing- stop INEC from reconfiguring the machines. And the court ruled one thing- refused his request.
Obidients can interprete the ruling to massage their ego any way they like.

Chekwume16:
How is it a win win when the same inec will be the ones to reconfigure and back up. Going to court against a sitting president is a waste of time in Nigeria

garfield1:


This isn't true madam.inec asked that obi cannot inspect the bvas but that they will save the data and transfer them.obi lawyers refused so Pandora is the loser

Ikea81:


INEC affirmed in their affidavit that no data will be tampered with. ....That's what LP is really after, the data and I am sure you don't know the importance of an affidavit cos your principal lied in one that he is 69yrs old when he is actually 89, and also swore on another to have a certificate he doesn't have..Criminals..una eye go soon clear.

Lizzysamuel:


Oga please never you come to my mention without a superior proof/argument.

You guys dumbness is out of this world.

garfield1:


The dumbness of zombidients is unrivalled kid

Seeeker:



INEC will save the data in their own server and na you go know whether tampered with or not.

ObiDENCE abi UGM na your name?

Lizzysamuel:


You see how sense you guys are.

Have you heard of forensic auditing before?

The panel, howeve asked INEC to upload data to back-end server and make true Certified copy to the respondents .

Chekwume16:
How is it a win win when the same inec will be the ones to reconfigure and back up. Going to court against a sitting president is a waste of time in Nigeria