Recall that when APC and INEC Lawyers were cross-examining the witness from AIT on Friday, they claimed that INEC Chairman, on the 23rd of February 2023, just two days before the election said that INEC will no longer transmit the election results on the day of election.
The Feb. 23 Publication by INEC clearly said RAW FIGURES won't be transmitted and not that the result would not be transmitted.

According to the INEC Chairman, Presiding Officers have the mandate to use the Bimodal Voters Accreditation (BVAS) machine to snap election results documented on the results sheet from each polling unit and upload the photo of the result on the INEC Result Viewing Portal (IRev) for anxious Nigerians to observe. He said raw figure transmitted electronically was susceptible to hacking.

He went to say that difference between what Kenya did in 2015 and what they are doing is that they are not transmitting raw figures for collation. "In fact, the law does not allow for electronic collation of results. So, we don’t transmit raw figures because raw figures transmitted online are more susceptible to hacking, while image of a document is not susceptible to hacking.

This shows that INEC and APC Lawyers were deliberately lying and trying to mislead the court.


https://tribuneonlineng.com/we-wont-transmit-raw-figures-of-election-results-inec-chairman/

Tinubu was not interested in a free, fair and credible Electoral process, he was only interested in grabbing, stealing and running away with the people's mandate

The publication says "Raw Figures"


Fear Lawyers

Ofunaofu:
Tinubu was not interested in a free, fair and credible Electoral process, he was only interested in grabbing, stealing and running away with the people's mandate

If the Lawyers are telling the court that INEC chairman said the result would not be transmitted, they have unknowing told Nigerians that the non-transmission of the presidential election result was intentional and not because of any technical issue as they earlier claimed.