tolue42:


You're an illiterate

Chucks13:


No it will start from your head to your village and your region, 1966 will be a child play.....shey una no wan hear word baa?

We are well prepare for una when we are done with you all then we will face Bode George,Macaroni, Falz and Iyabo Ojo and Okupe.

You think is on this alone? Na na na you missed ut bo.

Chucks13:


No it will start from your head to your village and your region, 1966 will be a child play.....shey una no wan hear word baa?

We are well prepare for una when we are done with you all then we will face Bode George,Macaroni, Falz and Iyabo Ojo and Okupe.

You think is on this alone? Na na na you missed ut bo.

TakeNigeriaBack:


He wrote what? He? or his lawyer? Make up your mind. Also, present the FULL quote here lets see.

LogicnReason:
Damn you are so unintelligent. Okay let me break it down for you. THE 2ND RESPONDENT wrote it. If you don't get it now, then I suggest you get out

SenatePresdo:

Iamgrey5:
In my years alive, I have never seen a more brainwashed set of people than the supporters of labour party.

Firstly, the problem been referred to here is the likely pandemonium the 25% in Abuja debate if ratified by the Court will create for future Elections.

> It will elevate Abuja voters above all other states in Nigeria.

> It will go against the constitution of Nigeria that states all votes cast in Nigeria are equal because it will mean casting your votes in Abuja is more important than casting it in Akure, Onisha or Kano.

Secondly, a runoff doesn't itself guarantee that the winner of the runoff will still get the 25% requirement in Abuja. So will we simply continue to go for runoffs until the winning candidate get 25% in Abuja even if he gets 25% in all the 36 states of the federation.

Furthermore, this will put a weird spotlight on the democraphics of Abuja in future Elections which might create an ugly situation. Politicians might just import people from other states to make up the 25% in Abuja which might create an unwanted national debate in the future. Tribes will begin to fight over who should be allowed to vote in Abuja etc.


In conclusion, Tinubu's lawyer in his final written argument to the judges is only pushing his legal points with real life likely scenarios that might come out of the judgement.

MRMRMR:

Someone is educating u and u are spewing nonsense. Think deep about his point b4 insult. Obidiiots are beyond redemption. Instead of thinking, they throw tantrums. No wonder u guys are always losing

Chucks13:


No Yoruba beat war drum beside I had told you obi fools I'm not from SW but was born in SW and proud to say it anyday.

Tell IBB that told you if Yoruba are drumming war he would go to sleep but whn the Yoruba faced him after he annulled June 12 did he survived it, was he able to sleep? Go ask IBB how far and don't forget to ask IBB to roll his trouser up and check his legs you will be shock what you will see.

Pls abeg you fool taken other tribe quietness as coward to pls f e c k off. The war drum the igbo drummed consumed 3 million innocent igbo souls is that your pride?

Chucks13:


No Yoruba beat war drum beside I had told you obi fools I'm not from SW but was born in SW and proud to say it anyday.

Tell IBB that told you if Yoruba are drumming war he would go to sleep but whn the Yoruba faced him after he annulled June 12 did he survived it, was he able to sleep? Go ask IBB how far and don't forget to ask IBB to roll his trouser up and check his legs you will be shock what you will see.

Pls abeg you fool taken other tribe quietness as coward to pls f e c k off. The war drum the igbo drummed consumed 3 million innocent igbo souls is that your pride?

TakeNigeriaBack:


Post the full quote here if you no dey fear. Even IPOB TV (sorry AriseTV) already expose the claim that the lawyer threatened anarchy as FALSE. If e sure you post it here:

shinealight:


And then it will finally consume you lot…. it surely doesn’t matter where it starts!

SenatePresdo:


Yorubas are eternal cowards.

Ordinary Wakili at Igangan, Yorubas run enter IDP camp at Benin Republic


Ordinary Endsars Oba of Lagos Japaa

LogicnReason:
You are such a loser. Tinubu must be living large with ignoramus like u

Chucks13:


Here we go again a very foolish human so you forgot how fulani invade a village in SE and everyone in the village ran to bush? Or you want to pretend you didn't read the news?

I knew no matter how you pretend to be non tribal bigot the hateful gene in you will surely raise its ugly head.

What baffles me most is how 99% obidient goats especially the igbo faction became these stupid beat my imagination, just read a nonentity statement you posted above, you get sense so? I doubt it wallahi....

So during Lagos governorship election that the Yoruba took over all the pollin units why didn't you fight back if dem born you?

A coward always beat chest. You boasted to bomb Eagle Square if Tinubu is sworn in and we came here to dares you to try it pls why not come to Eagle Square and try shit and lets see?

Ordinary Ekpa a small boy ordered his boys to be sitting your a s s at home forcefully pls what do you do about it?

Oh sorry I saw your brothers being laid down and flogged by ipob and ugm and they crying like baby pls where is that your strenght and power?

F e c k off bro you lack shame.....

BeardedmeatR:
E go consume you tooooo

TakeNigeriaBack:


So, you have NOTHING. Hence you resort to insults.

LogicnReason:
Yep you deserve only insult after you mentioned ipob TV. Really? And then asking to me to quote the statement? You are a nonentity abeg. Your type full nairaland. You are not worth logical discuss

Amayabor1:


Lol. Everyone who points out their foolishness is an obidient. In their shallow mind, every Nigerian that voted in the last election voted for either Tinubu or Obi. I wonder if it was Chadians that voted for Atiku. Useless idiots.

If you like wail from now till eternity; The law is the law. If the law says you must get 25% in FCT before you can be declared a president, so shall it be. If Nigerians do not like the law, they can tell their national assembly Representatives to change it, but for now, it is the law.

SenatePresdo:


Was that why Awolowo drank Rat poison and died instead of fighting like a man?

Was that why Abiola who won Election was picked like shit and put inside prison and injected him dog shit where he wasted away?

Taaa.. Yorubas no get levels.

Why have they not killed Nnamdi Kanu? Despite how Nigerian soldiers were massacred in the East because of him?

They know KANU is not from Coward SadWastes

Make Tinubu do nonsense so he kpeme like Abiola, and nothing go happen

Igwe9:

What you need to understand is that Abuja is the seat of power, if votes are the same then any candidate that gets highest number of votes wins. no need for 25% in 2/3 of the States. Besides, why was the word "including FCT" not used, why "AND FCT"? that means that FCT is a must.
Think before you type, you can manipulate votes easily in any other state but you can't manipulate that of Abuja easily. States have Governors that write results even before the voting starts but Abuja has no Governor.

Abuja should be used as the yardstick for every state.

Reinamaria:
You shall know a wicked man by his words.
Tinubu is a very wicked man, who has bad intentions for Nigeria.

Petie33:

He hehe your type think from their ass did you forget about states also have capital too why is the same law not apply too if it's a law in the first place

Iamgrey5:
In my years alive, I have never seen a more brainwashed set of people than the supporters of labour party.

Firstly, the problem been referred to here is the likely pandemonium the 25% in Abuja debate if ratified by the Court will create for future Elections.

> It will elevate Abuja voters above all other states in Nigeria.

> It will go against the constitution of Nigeria that states all votes cast in Nigeria are equal because it will mean casting your votes in Abuja is more important than casting it in Akure, Onisha or Kano.

Secondly, a runoff doesn't itself guarantee that the winner of the runoff will still get the 25% requirement in Abuja. So will we simply continue to go for runoffs until the winning candidate get 25% in Abuja even if he gets 25% in all the 36 states of the federation.

Furthermore, this will put a weird spotlight on the democraphics of Abuja in future Elections which might create an ugly situation. Politicians might just import people from other states to make up the 25% in Abuja which might create an unwanted national debate in the future. Tribes will begin to fight over who should be allowed to vote in Abuja etc.


In conclusion, Tinubu's lawyer in his final written argument to the judges is only pushing his legal points with real life likely scenarios that might come out of the judgement.

Chucks13:


Bulaba, buluba, balablu, blabla, bloblo, blehbleh, blublu, balabala, bejeweled, bilibili shit..........carry on I tuned you already FM radio NL frequency 001....carry on.

Ewu anukpama!!! Eze Indiala nonentity chest beater slowpoke.

F e c k off...

Iamgrey5:
In my years alive, I have never seen a more brainwashed set of people than the supporters of labour party.

Firstly, the problem been referred to here is the likely pandemonium the 25% in Abuja debate if ratified by the Court will create for future Elections.

> It will elevate Abuja voters above all other states in Nigeria.

> It will go against the constitution of Nigeria that states all votes cast in Nigeria are equal because it will mean casting your votes in Abuja is more important than casting it in Akure, Onisha or Kano.

Secondly, a runoff doesn't itself guarantee that the winner of the runoff will still get the 25% requirement in Abuja. So will we simply continue to go for runoffs until the winning candidate get 25% in Abuja even if he gets 25% in all the 36 states of the federation.

Furthermore, this will put a weird spotlight on the democraphics of Abuja in future Elections which might create an ugly situation. Politicians might just import people from other states to make up the 25% in Abuja which might create an unwanted national debate in the future. Tribes will begin to fight over who should be allowed to vote in Abuja etc.


In conclusion, Tinubu's lawyer in his final written argument to the judges is only pushing his legal points with real life likely scenarios that might come out of the judgement.

Igwe9:

Mumu dey compare federal and state, who makes the constitution?
Does state capital have a commissioner as the case maybe?
Typical, You will never disappoint.

Igwe9:

What you need to understand is that Abuja is the seat of power, if votes are the same then any candidate that gets highest number of votes wins. no need for 25% in 2/3 of the States. Besides, why was the word "including FCT" not used, why "AND FCT"? that means that FCT is a must.
Think before you type, you can manipulate votes easily in any other state but you can't manipulate that of Abuja easily. States have Governors that write results even before the voting starts but Abuja has no Governor.

Abuja should be used as the yardstick for every state.

Iamgrey5:
In my years alive, I have never seen a more brainwashed set of people than the supporters of labour party.

Firstly, the problem been referred to here is the likely pandemonium the 25% in Abuja debate if ratified by the Court will create for future Elections.

> It will elevate Abuja voters above all other states in Nigeria.

> It will go against the constitution of Nigeria that states all votes cast in Nigeria are equal because it will mean casting your votes in Abuja is more important than casting it in Akure, Onisha or Kano.

Secondly, a runoff doesn't itself guarantee that the winner of the runoff will still get the 25% requirement in Abuja. So will we simply continue to go for runoffs until the winning candidate get 25% in Abuja even if he gets 25% in all the 36 states of the federation.

Furthermore, this will put a weird spotlight on the democraphics of Abuja in future Elections which might create an ugly situation. Politicians might just import people from other states to make up the 25% in Abuja which might create an unwanted national debate in the future. Tribes will begin to fight over who should be allowed to vote in Abuja etc.


In conclusion, Tinubu's lawyer in his final written argument to the judges is only pushing his legal points with real life likely scenarios that might come out of the judgement.