In a recent legal development that has drawn widespread attention, the court has rendered a significant judgment by striking out the All Progressives Movement's (APM) suit against Shettima and Tinubu. The court's decision, grounded in the absence of merit, is a crucial moment in the ongoing political discourse surrounding these prominent figures.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMwgnwS3X4s

The central issue at the heart of this case pertains to the APM's challenge to Shettima and Tinubu. Specifically, the APM had raised concerns about their eligibility and sought legal remedies to address these concerns.

However, after a thorough examination of the evidence presented and the legal arguments made, the court determined that the APM's suit lacked the requisite merit to proceed further. This decision underscores the importance of a rigorous legal process that hinges on the strength of the case brought before the court.

The concept of merit is a cornerstone of legal proceedings, ensuring that cases presented to the court are based on substantial evidence and adhere to the principles of justice and fairness. In this case, the court's ruling highlights that the APM's claims did not meet the necessary legal standards to warrant continued consideration.