Am really confused here.The birth of christ or the death anyway i believe christ was sent to earth so he can reconcile man with God.Both are significant.

yes thats it, you've answered the qwestion.

Yes, he wouldn't be able to die if he weren't born and we wouldn't be born again if he was never crucified. They both are important.

The death is most important.

Ressurection.

But how is there death without there first being life?

Easter cos he arose from the grave to make the difference.

Easter is more Significiant

otokx:

Easter because he arose from the grave to make the difference.

But he had to be born first. I say both are significant.

Easter. Wasn't that obvious?

anyone who tries to rip Easter and Christmas apart is bidding for the wrath of God on his head.

How could one even think that one is more important than the other. Both events are significant, important, individually unique, and one wont have meaning without the other.

Jesus was born pure and holy, through a holy vessel in the person of Mother Mary. He died a unique death to fulfill a certain unique purpose and awoke from death in a unique way.

If anyone says he/she puts a dividing line between Easter and Christmas, my conclusion is that such person is not a Christian.

kimba:

one wont have meaning without the other.

My point exactly.

They are both significant

They are both significant

They are both significant but the Easter Celebration means more to me.

Christmas. New clothes and a lot of masquerades on display.

Easter

They are of equal significance.He was born to die for our sins,and he couldn't die if he hadn't been born.His birth is as important as his death,he was born to die,and he died to give us a reason to live n be born again.

Can they bury you if you were not born? The birth was perfected in His death. You cannot and should not Separate them

---

^{What God has joined together, let no man put asunder}

christmas of course

Rhodalyn:

christmas of course

because you get more food and presents

See, the purpose of xmas is not the food, drinks and presents. It's about God's love for us which He demonstrated by sending Jesus down here. It's left to us if we went to accept this great gift of love or not. I have.

of course its not food. Its for God both easter and christmas thats why they are both significant

I'm going with Christmas because Father Christmas is way cooler than the Easter bunny.

Both are totally irrelevant and man-made

vooks:
Both are totally irrelevant and man-made

this is taking things for granted. Without the memorials of xmas and easter it would have been almost impossible to keep Christianity alive all these centuries. The holy spirit guided the church to do it likewise the scriptures.

Christmas jor! There's christmas bonus at work and it ushers in another bonus- 13th month . And then there's Salah bonus! No Easter Bonus

#Team.Abrahamic.Religious.Holidays

Which scriptures?

btoks:

this is taking things for granted. Without the memorials of xmas and easter it would have been almost impossible to keep Christianity alive all these centuries. The holy spirit guided the church to do it likewise the scriptures.

vooks:

Which scriptures?

Holy spirit inspired men to write books that ended up being OT and NT.

What scriptures from Genesis to Revelation tell you to celebrate Christmas or Easter?
These are late traditions and Christianity was doing fine by itself before the inventions came in

btoks:
Holy spirit inspired men to write books that ended up being OT and NT.

vooks:

What scriptures from Genesis to Revelation tell you to celebrate Christmas or Easter?
These are late traditions and Christianity was doing fine by itself before the inventions came in

now I see you didn't understand my original comment. the holy spirit guided the church.(pillar and foundation of truth) just like he guided the authors of the bible books.
The church is able to bind and loose as per Jesus.
The Jews celebrated the passover feast, easter is the fulfilment of the passover.
my question to you is,how do know that we should believe in the writings from Genesis to Rev? Also you do realise that the scriptures were written decades after the event?

You want me to take you through why ONLY 66 books make the canon?
The OT was already codified by the time of Christ and even Jesus alluded to this.
The NT. The last book was done in 95-6 AD

Now, the idea that Holy Spirit revealed stuff to latter day believers which was hidden from the Primitive/Early church is catholic-esque. They have no qualms believing that Mary was Assumed even in absence of that from the NT. are you Catholic?

btoks:
now I see you didn't understand my original comment. the holy spirit guided the church.(pillar and foundation of truth) just like he guided the authors of the bible books.
The church is able to bind and loose as per Jesus.
The Jews celebrated the passover feast, easter is the fulfilment of the passover.
my question to you is,how do know that we should believe in the writings from Genesis to Rev? Also you do realise that the scriptures were written decades after the event?