I see some terrorists crying in the comments section

If police no admit, them go cry...

If police admit.. Them go cry.... Knife attacks happen everywhere...

They said he has been mentally unstable since he was 17....them no see that one...

This is totally different from a terrorist activity...

He didn't shout alahu akhbar before killing people.....

But when the radical Muslims terrorists want to commit their atrocities, they scream alahu akbar and start killing people.... That's terrorism because up until that point, most of the attackers didn't show any sign of mental instability....
U guys should know the difference

shoodboi2:
Joel Cauchi is not African and he's not a Muslim. If he were, they would have plastered their headlines with "Muslim man this" and "African migrant that" but he's white, so they say he has mental illness.

But now that he is a White Christian man, they are saying there's no "ideological motive" because presumably, he needs to be a Muslim or African to have an ideological motive. If he were a Muslim, they would've started mentioning Islam as if he did it because of religion and not because he's just being nasty.

And if he were an African migrant, that will even be worse. They will use it to support their removal of Africans and blacks from Australia and justify denying us visas because according to them, we are wild animals that need to be tamed.

This clearly is a clear case of the anti-African and anti-Islamic posture being spread by western media.

But the Koran admonises Muslim faithfuls to attack/kill infidels. It is in the Koran (the reason why islamic terrorism indoctrination is very easy, because you can simply point to the Koran that Allah commands it and you have hundreds of followers ready to wear a bomb vest)

Sometimes, even when these Islamic terrorists carry out attacks, they release a statement afterwards claiming they did it for Allah (e.g, the early days of Boko Haram). Infact, they release Koran verses to support their atrocities. Al-Qadea does this too. Infact, some leaders of islamic terrorists groups will release a "Fatwa" calling on all Muslim faithfuls to attack a given target (Osama bin laden released a Fatwa which lead to the September 11 bombings in the US)

So if a Muslim man kills people and comes out to say he did it because of his religion, I shouldn't believe him?

Go and take several sits abeg!

shoodboi2:
Joel Cauchi is not African and he's not a Muslim. If he were, they would have plastered their headlines with "Muslim man this" and "African migrant that" but he's white, so they say he has mental illness.

But now that he is a White Christian man, they are saying there's no "ideological motive" because presumably, he needs to be a Muslim or African to have an ideological motive. If he were a Muslim, they would've started mentioning Islam as if he did it because of religion and not because he's just being nasty.

And if he were an African migrant, that will even be worse. They will use it to support their removal of Africans and blacks from Australia and justify denying us visas because according to them, we are wild animals that need to be tamed.

This clearly is a clear case of the anti-African and anti-Islamic posture being spread by western media.

The guy is mentally disturbed. The police knew all about him for some time, and where he grew up, he was known to be schizophrenic.

Also, the press does report when people are mentally ill, regardless of race. There was a case in germany where a muslim guy did the same thing, and almost immediately it was reported he had ongoing mental issues.

Also, terrorists usually declare responsibilty immediately, as seen in the france truck attack for example.

It's not terrorism because he's a white Christian male. These people are the worst hypocrites on earth.

he may have been hypnotized

dominique:
Oh so it's no longer a terrorist attack. It's only after an assailant is identified that we're able to conclude if the attack was terrorist, gang violence or from a depressed individual with mental health issues due to a traumatized childhood.

Because he isn't African nor a muslim, it's no longer a terrorist attack

Africans themselves are tools in the hands of these people, they willingly fight and defend these Europeans of Caucasian descents to the extent of fighting their fellow Africans or even insulting their borrowed religion in the process.

Mental slaves abound in Africa.

And the people started attacking Muslims for no reason at all .

BlueStripper:


He is "white" don't you get it .

Pink skin. Caucasian.

They dont deserved to be called whites!

BlueStripper:


He is "white" don't you get it .

Nope mentally disturbed. His family has spoken. Police in his home region knew him well (he perpetrated the crime outside his home region).
When white people do things for terrorism, it is reported. See people like Brevik, and also the famous case of the canadian incel, who went on a woman killing spree before he killed himself. Go back in histroy in the USA for example, and there is a long list of white terrorists from the 1960's onward...left and right leaning. Kacziyski was clearly disturbed, yet was treated as a terrorist., for example. Tarrant in NZ who shot up two mosques was treated as a terrorist.

CaptainFM1:


Stop weeping religious sentiments around. The world has moved beyond what you're trying to remind her.

One mental slave detected. Once the attacker is their lord and savior, they'll start attacking people who points out the injustice.

You're doing just that.

Slave

shoodboi2:
Joel Cauchi is not African and he's not a Muslim. If he were, they would have plastered their headlines with "Muslim man this" and "African migrant that" but he's white, so they say he has mental illness.

But now that he is a White Christian man, they are saying there's no "ideological motive" because presumably, he needs to be a Muslim or African to have an ideological motive. If he were a Muslim, they would've started mentioning Islam as if he did it because of religion and not because he's just being nasty.

And if he were an African migrant, that will even be worse. They will use it to support their removal of Africans and blacks from Australia and justify denying us visas because according to them, we are wild animals that need to be tamed.

This clearly is a clear case of the anti-African and anti-Islamic posture being spread by western media.

When has an african ever done something like this?

Crafteck1:


But he is mentally disturbed, now when an act that only mentally disturbed people can do becomes a norm for a sect of people from a particular religion,to the extent that when its done, everyone is almost sure its them... what does that tell you?

But Africans or Muslims can't be mentally disturbed?

Procashtips:

One mental slave detected. Once the attacker is their lord and savior, they'll start attacking people who points out the injustice.

You're doing just that.

Slave

SMHFU!

3seriez:


Normal thing. The hypocrisy we have to get used to.

We must not get used to it.

We must fight it

We're in the information era

If our parents allowed it, we must not.

Let's not keep quiet until their aim with this is defeated.

ALL YOU FKERS SHOULD UP ...... MUSLIMS GO HAND IN HAND WITH TERRORISM..... WHEN YOU DONE TERRORISM ALL YOUR LIFE.... And the whole world have identified you with terrorism...... I owe no apology if they tag you with any violent crime.....

Oga you're also a hypocrite.

You would have called him a terrorist, attack his religion and sacred people IF HE WERE TO BE A MUSLIM.

Hypocrisy kee u all

CaptainFM1:


Stop weeping religious sentiments around. The world has moved beyond what you're trying to remind her.

shoodboi2:
Joel Cauchi is not African and he's not a Muslim. If he were, they would have plastered their headlines with "Muslim man this" and "African migrant that" but he's white, so they say he has mental illness.

But now that he is a White Christian man, they are saying there's no "ideological motive" because presumably, he needs to be a Muslim or African to have an ideological motive. If he were a Muslim, they would've started mentioning Islam as if he did it because of religion and not because he's just being nasty.

And if he were an African migrant, that will even be worse. They will use it to support their removal of Africans and blacks from Australia and justify denying us visas because according to them, we are wild animals that need to be tamed.

This clearly is a clear case of the anti-African and anti-Islamic posture being spread by western media.

Did the attacker shout "I kill you in Jesus mighty name?" Or did you hear he selected people that could not recite John 3 verse 16? When alshabab slaughtered hundreds in the Nairobi mall attack didn't they ask people to recite the Koran before slaughtering those who couldn't? So who is the one associating their religion to their killings? From these clear and verifiable examples that even a goat can understand, who is the one associating their religion with their killing? The people that burnt Deborah in Sokoto did they hide the reason why they did it? So what kind of brain can still blame other people for understanding what you have openly said? Ask yourself what kind of brain do you have? A goat has a better brain than your brain

CaptainFM1:


SMHFU!

Slave

Once it's Monday, go and queue at their embassy as usual.

Interior slave.

Joel Cauchi

Western media have covered for terrorist Islamic extremists for uncountable amount of times. I'm not supporting whatever they classified this as but we mustn't mislead the public. Whenever there's an ideological reason reason for an act it's different from when someone act under an influence of drugs or mental illness.

mu2sa2:
See the hypocrisy: They don't believe it is an act of terror. Why? Yes of course the suspect is a christian man. They wont call him christian terrorist. If the suspect were to bear a muslim name they would have filled the air waves with name calling. Hallelujah! Allah is Great!

shoodboi2:
Joel Cauchi is not African and he's not a Muslim. If he were, they would have plastered their headlines with "Muslim man this" and "African migrant that" but he's white, so they say he has mental illness.

But now that he is a White Christian man, they are saying there's no "ideological motive" because presumably, he needs to be a Muslim or African to have an ideological motive. If he were a Muslim, they would've started mentioning Islam as if he did it because of religion and not because he's just being nasty.

And if he were an African migrant, that will even be worse. They will use it to support their removal of Africans and blacks from Australia and justify denying us visas because according to them, we are wild animals that need to be tamed.

This clearly is a clear case of the anti-African and anti-Islamic posture being spread by western media.

. It doesn't change the fact the Islam is synonymous with terrorism

mu2sa2:
See the hypocrisy: They don't believe it is an act of terror. Why? Yes of course the suspect is a christian man. They wont call him christian terrorist. If the suspect were to bear a muslim name they would have filled the air waves with name calling. Hallelujah!
Allah is Great!

It's nobody's fault to stigmatize Muslims with terror, because Islam adherent believe in the gospel of knife.

dominique:
Oh so it's no longer a terrorist attack. It's only after an assailant is identified that we're able to conclude if the attack was terrorist, gang violence or from a depressed individual with mental health issues due to a traumatized childhood.

It's nobody's fault to suspect Islam influence in the first place because Muslims are known for their radicalism and gospel of the knife.

shoodboi2:
Joel Cauchi is not African and he's not a Muslim. If he were, they would have plastered their headlines with "Muslim man this" and "African migrant that" but he's white, so they say he has mental illness.

But now that he is a White Christian man, they are saying there's no "ideological motive" because presumably, he needs to be a Muslim or African to have an ideological motive. If he were a Muslim, they would've started mentioning Islam as if he did it because of religion and not because he's just being nasty.

And if he were an African migrant, that will even be worse. They will use it to support their removal of Africans and blacks from Australia and justify denying us visas because according to them, we are wild animals that need to be tamed.

This clearly is a clear case of the anti-African and anti-Islamic posture being spread by western media.

It's nobody's fault to suspect Islam influence in the first place because Muslims are known for their radicalism and gospel of the knife.

shoodboi2:


E pain you, abi? Panadol don cost o. 🤣😂🤡🤡

Who born this stray dog?
Na you need panadol and dichlofenac pass na. You were the one crying about stereotyping

shoodboi2:
Joel Cauchi is not African and he's not a Muslim. If he were, they would have plastered their headlines with "Muslim man this" and "African migrant that" but he's white, so they say he has mental illness.

But now that he is a White Christian man, they are saying there's no "ideological motive" because presumably, he needs to be a Muslim or African to have an ideological motive. If he were a Muslim, they would've started mentioning Islam as if he did it because of religion and not because he's just being nasty.

And if he were an African migrant, that will even be worse. They will use it to support their removal of Africans and blacks from Australia and justify denying us visas because according to them, we are wild animals that need to be tamed.

This clearly is a clear case of the anti-African and anti-Islamic posture being spread by western media.

Baba quit making sport if yourself nahhh.... besides,did you hear him shout any name before killing people?!
See guilty conscience

Chai!!!!! See what Nigerians are arguing about!!!!?

You guys are a huge disgrace!!!!!

dominique:
Oh so it's no longer a terrorist attack. It's only after an assailant is identified that we're able to conclude if the attack was terrorist, gang violence or from a depressed individual with mental health issues due to a traumatized childhood.

You nailed it.

Seems you didn't get the memo
Yes we have to be sure of the colour and religion of the assailant before they are properly labelled
Thy hypocrite of the West

Person una fr send naija mk e fellow us suffer mk him head correct

Morphinne:

Who born this stray dog?
Na you need panadol and dichlofenac pass na. You were the one crying about stereotyping

Pele. 🤡🤡🤡

shoodboi2:
Joel Cauchi is not African and he's not a Muslim. If he were, they would have plastered their headlines with "Muslim man this" and "African migrant that" but he's white, so they say he has mental illness.

But now that he is a White Christian man, they are saying there's no "ideological motive" because presumably, he needs to be a Muslim or African to have an ideological motive. If he were a Muslim, they would've started mentioning Islam as if he did it because of religion and not because he's just being nasty.

And if he were an African migrant, that will even be worse. They will use it to support their removal of Africans and blacks from Australia and justify denying us visas because according to them, we are wild animals that need to be tamed.

This clearly is a clear case of the anti-African and anti-Islamic posture being spread by western media.

You don't have to drag africanism into your religious extremism.

shoodboi2:
Joel Cauchi is not African and he's not a Muslim. If he were, they would have plastered their headlines with "Muslim man this" and "African migrant that" but he's white, so they say he has mental illness.

But now that he is a White Christian man, they are saying there's no "ideological motive" because presumably, he needs to be a Muslim or African to have an ideological motive. If he were a Muslim, they would've started mentioning Islam as if he did it because of religion and not because he's just being nasty.

And if he were an African migrant, that will even be worse. They will use it to support their removal of Africans and blacks from Australia and justify denying us visas because according to them, we are wild animals that need to be tamed.

This clearly is a clear case of the anti-African and anti-Islamic posture being spread by western media.

Even the bigots on nairaland started saying he's a Muslim. They started blaming West for allowing Muslims into their country, they think western countries are blind like them. The US is one of the countries with multi religion, are they Backward the way my naija is today? Let's all reason beyond our nose, I know devil is pushing hard to tarnish Islam, but God can never be mocked. I will be reading the comments of the fools that are coming after my comment.