EreluRoz:
Nobody is dragging head with any man but let them be head in it's complete sense by providing and making sure his wife and family lives a luxurious life else the head will be dragged the moment they start demanding their wives contribute financially.

Women are created to enjoy their life and care for her home but modern men have successfully pushed women into hustling and providing financially which is why we record more divorce in this generation than the older generation.

Men should safeguard being the head or ready to share the head.

You're so smart...

UjuJoan2:


Nobody is the HEAD. Husband and wife are co-captains, and each have their own roles to fulfill, both equally important.

It’s easy to say people should defer in area where they are not competent, but what if you married a know it all? Who thinks they always knows what is best for the family?

Conflicts will certainly arise, and it’s only fair for women to defer to men if they refuse to listen (which for me is out of respect for their age, since most husbands are older than their wives, not because they are men). But if a man consistently makes bad choices, and refuses to listen to reason all the time, then the woman has every right to reject his decision.

This logic does not work in any life situation.

Na recipe for disaster.

Kobojunkie:
1. The Bible does no such thing as you claim there. Rather, Paul and Peter, both of whom lived in the Land of Canaan, during the time that was the Last Days of God's Judgement against the Nation of Israel(and Judah) under the Law of Moses, for reasons best known to them chose to assert the stance of the Old Law of Moses where married women are concerned. Jesus Christ, God's New Law, however, made it abundantly clear that in the Kingdom of God

▶ Marriage is of the world of men and not of the Kingdom of God - Luke 20 vs 34 - 36. This is to echo the fact that God Himself cursed marriage from the beginning(Genesis 3 vs 16) and that which is cursed cannot be of the Kingdom of God.
▶ There is only one head over a man and a woman in His Kingdom, and He alone is that Head/Teacher/Authority/Master - Matthew 23 vs 8 - 10
▶ All men and women in His Kingdom are equaled (No hierarchies) exist in His Kingdom- Matthew 23 vs 8 - 10
▶ There are no blessings in the Kingdom of God on those who choose marriage; only those who chose to live as Eunuchs have God's special blessings - Matthew 19 vs 11 - 12
▶ Those among the women who would choose to have children should weep for themselves and their children for it is those of them who would live as Eunuch(and the barren among them) that are blessed by God - Luke 23 vs 27 - 23

This can't be normal

None of the passages you quoted here said those things you attached to them. Not a single one.

And which Paul and Peter lived in the land of Canaan?

Lmao...

This cannot be normal...

1000Capacity:


In everything you typed, you are just confusing yourself

🤣

FatherCHRISTMAS:


Let her be. I like her that way. You have to be an atheist to understand truth. The moment you are able to hit atheism, that means you are no longer following blindly. That's means you are on the path to discovering truth.
You cant find truth without first questioning the age old teachings

An atheist who quotes the bible.

That's a new one.

Kelechi009:


Go in peace ke?! No oh, I am not a preacher of love, I am not here to preach love at all.

I am not trying to correct you, I am here to tell you that you're mentally deranged, you both should get your head checked in the psychiatric wards.

Mental illness is YOU trying to quote a text from a book you do not believe in, a book you hate & despise, a book you believe is a myth but you constantly quote it. You must be really CRAZY!

If you know you are not a BASTARD, refrain from this mentally ill behaviour.

🤣🤣

RepoMan007:

1. how will competwncy be established when vocatuon of both partner doesnt cover such issue?
2. your example of accountant managing finance is not appropriate. in marriages with no accountant, who manages it? besides accounting is centred around book and record keeping and not administratìon.

Great logic. 👍

crackhaus:
■ This can't be normal None of the passages you quoted here said those things you attached to them. Not a single one.
■ And which Paul and Peter lived in the land of Canaan? Lmao... This cannot be normal...

1.Wow...
You mean Jesus Christ never decreed the following in His Kingdom;
▶ All men and women are equals
▶ He alone is the Teacher, Master, Head, Shepherd, Authority, etc. In His Kingdom
▶ That God's special blessing/permissions belong to those who would live as Eunuchs for the sake of His Kingdom
▶ That women with children should cry for themselves and their children...

2. You didn't know Paul and Peter lived in the land of Canaan in the nation of Judah?

Let me guess. You have never actually read the book yourself but you are all too certain everything your MOGs have ever told you of it is true, right? You religious folks are very predictable. You will even throw God and the Bible in the fire all so you can hold on to the particular delusions you cling to.

How did I miss this thread

EreluRoz:
Nobody is dragging head with any man but let them be head in it's complete sense by providing and making sure his wife and family lives a luxurious life else the head will be dragged the moment they start demanding their wives contribute financially.

Women are created to enjoy their life and care for her home but modern men have successfully pushed women into hustling and providing financially which is why we record more divorce in this generation than the older generation.

Men should safeguard being the head or ready to share the head.

Raise am Raise am

crackhaus:

This logic does not work in any life situation.

Na recipe for disaster.

It's called consensus decision making. It breaks down in large groups, but it works if the group is small. A marriage consisting of a man and a woman is small enough for consensus decision making to work as long as each party is reasonable and wants the other party to also succeed. For the sake of harmony, the husband's wishes take priority in some areas and the wife's wishes take priority in other areas.

Seun:

It's called consensus decision making. It breaks down in large groups, but it works if the group is small. A marriage consisting of a man and a woman is small enough for consensus decision making to work as long as each party is reasonable and wants the other party to also succeed. For the sake of harmony, the husband's wishes take priority in some areas and the wife's wishes take priority in other areas.

It's nice when you speak like this. Objective analysis. Cool.

Man wouldhavebeen husband open tread ontop marriage matter....Oluwaseun

Seun:

It's called consensus decision making. It breaks down in large groups, but it works if the group is small. A marriage consisting of a man and a woman is small enough for consensus decision making to work as long as each party is reasonable and wants the other party to also succeed. For the sake of harmony, the husband's wishes take priority in some areas and the wife's wishes take priority in other areas.

I think you have it mixed up.

Consensus decision making works best in large groups where the majority can win a vote.
In a group consisting of two people, you can't have a consensus when both parties have opposing ideas. At best, what you'll have is a compromise.

In marriage, it becomes an issue of who should compromise more and in what situation. You captured the essence of 'compromise' in your last sentence.

Consensus means decisions will require the agreement of everybody. Clearly it's easier for two people to come to agreement than for 100 people to come to agreement on an issue.