omanzo02:

Posting the video on a public dormain will make the case in court useless, defence lawyers can easily disqualify the video and get their client off the hook, If there is a video, it will be played in court to the judges, lawyers and those present in court on that day.

seges: Look at the copy of the report from page 140( http://omojuwa.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/FINAL-SUBSIDY-REPORT..pdf) it implicates AP owned my Otedola.This is why Otedola is trying to sccuttle the integrity of the report.

Frank-C:
Ok. They are not more human than you. Go and buy ticket to fly presidential jet. Even in heaven, there is hierarchy. Sometimes, people just want to live in dreamland.

Beaf:

Have you heard of prejudicing a case? If the matter is going to court, you do not put the evidence before the public or it technically becomes inadmissible as evidence.
I'm not a legal expert, but there must be lawyers in the house to back this up.

holahabib: Chineke God!

onthefence:

Wrong. We do not operate the jury system. Its only when a matter is already in court that you may do something to prejudice it. At this stage nothing should be done to INTERFERE with investigations, assuming they are incomplete as it stands.

Prejudice
Definition - Transitive Verb
1 : to injure or damage the rights of by some legal action or prejudice <if it appears that a defendant or the government is prejudiced by a joinder of offenses ­Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 14>
2 : to injure or damage (rights) by some legal action or prejudice <that the denial prejudiced his right to a fair trial> <this clause does not ~ other rights>

Definition - Noun
[Old French, from Latin praejudicium previous judgment, damage, from prae- before + judicium judgment]
1 : injury or detriment to one's legal rights or claims (as from the action of another): as
a : substantial impairment of a defendant's ability to defend <the court found no ~ to the defendant by the lengthy delay in bringing charges>
b : tendency for a decision on an improper basis (as past conduct) by a trier of fact <whether an ex parte communication to a deliberating jury resulted in any reasonable possibility of ~ to the defendant ­National Law Journal>
c : implied waiver of rights and privileges not explicitly retained < District Court erred in attaching ~ to prisoner's complaint for injunctive relief ­National Law Journal>
2 : a final and binding decision (as an adjudication on the merits) that bars further prosecution of the same cause of action or motion <dismisses this case with ~> <the dismissal was without ~>
3 a : an irrational attitude of hostility directed against an individual, a group, a race, or their supposed characteristics <the Constitution does not prohibit laws based on ~ per se ­R. H. Bork>
b : an attitude or disposition (as of a judge) that prevents impartiality <that the judge before whom the matter is pending has a personal bias or ~...against him ­U.S. Code>
Pronunciation'pre-j&-d&s

acidtalk:

You Bloody Freaking Son Of LUCIFER.
Don't go crying again that I insulted you because you just opened your ver own coffin.

You LOW LIFE, Drug addict gay bastard.
You said amen to the Prayer CONFIRMATING how your generation yet unboen will live and die a miserable life.

Why have you been so scared of the prayer, or did you realize the implication of how you just ruined your life and that of your unborn generation for supporting evil, corruption and lies and make the citizens suffer in frustration and hardhip?

RENO OMOKRI, for the hungry child, the old whose pension was denied, the accidents caused by nondevelopment or road and other infrastructions and the others, you and you likes will eventually have a miserable life on earth because for the crumbs you want to eat, you have put others into sorrows.


Don't dare go about crying about my prayers for you, 'cus if you do, the Wrath of God will Perish you.


You just started a new war......

Beaf:

You sound quite daft, sick and insane, bro.
It is quite evident that you are at war with both yourself and common sense. Since I am not Reno Omokri, shouldn't your prayer return to you and become a fulfilled wish for yourself? Say "amen," fool.
Lolzzz!

There are too many people like acidtalk with mental health issues running around NL.

Beaf:

I take it that you do not know the meaning of the word, prejudice.
It has nothing to do with the jury system, as much as it has to swaying public opinion before judgement as a way to influence legal direction.
I don't enjoy daft conversation based on half-baked knowledge. So bro, please help yourself to a legal definition of the word:



http://research.lawyers.com/glossary/prejudice.html

I don't want any Dugbe market level comments, but would prefer comments on the matter from lawyers, because they know what exactly they are talking about in such matters from the Nigerian legal viewpoint.

onthefence:

It costs nothing to learn. You can not prejudice a matter that is not already in court. Simple. Has FL been charged to court? What are you in essence prejudicing. I repeat at this stage you can only Interfere with investigations.

klairekk: NLC, Save Nigeria Group where is thy STING :-XNLC, Save Nigeria Group where is thy STING

lacidi:

Sir, you can actually prejudice a matter that is not yet in Court. If a particular case is going to court and the primary evidence in that case is thrown open to public opinion, it can be argued in court that the Judge has become prejudiced by the comments and opinions expressed by the public on the evidence. In fact, if there is a poll in the newspaper which shows that majority of lawyers believe that the evidence presented is real/fake, then one can argue that the Judge had already formed an opinion or could be said to have been swayed by such opinion of a majority of his colleagues even before the evidence is put before him in court.

It would even be worse if the Judges friend, brother, colleague, extended family member, old boys association or whatever had stated an opinion on the evidence prior to the case going to court.

ballabriggs: So Lawan said he was going to rope Otedola even when he has done no wrong.

A whole Femi Otedola! Is Lawan that stupid that he does not know the power Otedola possesses?

Rewind....

seges: Look at the copy of the report from page 140( http://omojuwa.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/FINAL-SUBSIDY-REPORT..pdf) it implicates AP owned my Otedola.This is why Otedola is trying to sccuttle the integrity of the report.

Demdem: @emmasege
Will u shut up and be patient. When did the bribery scandal became a public knowledge? wasnt it over this past weekend? wont they take their time to go through all these allegations and counter allegations before coming out to take a position. Some of u guys are simply pathetic

emmasege:

Hypocrite, did it take them so long to oppose fuel subsidy removal which was a good move though, and did they ever speak up during the Fashola/Doctors saga?

The_Matrix:

Sire, yu are danm ryt on dis one, I'm taking the whole subsidy report panel thinghy wit a pinch of salt, Farouk would be damn ryt stewpid if he feels he could rope in the high and mighty Otedola when he is innocent. More so with the like of beef and pork concluding that Farouk was guilty, makes the whole thing have a political undertone

The_Matrix:

Sire, yu are danm ryt on dis one, I'm taking the whole subsidy report panel thinghy wit a pinch of salt, Farouk would be damn ryt stewpid if he feels he could rope in the high and mighty Otedola when he is innocent. More so with the like of beef and pork concluding that Farouk was guilty, makes the whole thing have a political undertone

onthefence:

Trash. What makes Soyinka more qualified than you? Grow some self esteem my friend.

lekkie073:
Soyinka is renowned globally, i bet u̶̲̥̅̊ я not even known in ur village!