And some say the price of goods are already at black market rate. if so then what is the point of devalueing when the prices have adjusted themselves?

People talking about devaluation should take a deep breath and consider the points that were being raised and also vice versa.
1. Will devaluation grow more dollar?
2. Why do this same western economist fight against devaluation of the Chinese yuan, Japanese Yen etc?
3. If the price of oil rises to $60 today, i bet you the value of dollar would crash giving truth to the theory that we just dont have the dollars now, devaluation or no devaluation. but if the price of oil were to go up, where would the devaluation argument be?

If you look carefully, those people are not chinese people. they are exhibition people

see real lying in action

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwnFxWl5YzM

Anyway i have not seen the video you are referring to, but i will give you some advise and answer your question, why is it that you can never conduct yourself in a civil manner and use civil language? I guess its like shaykh adnan said, you were raised upon foul language so it is difficult to wean yourself away from it. but do yourself a favour and converse in civil manner.

So it is a matter of who made the accusation first before answers should be given? Get this clear, sunnis are not afraid to censure any sunni (scholar/layman) who makes errorneous claims, be it shirk or less than that. the problem is when people who have built their life upon deception says something, you have to double check, couple with the fact that those making the accusation are not known to have any proper understanding of islam (for the avoidance of doubt. i meant the rawafid shia).

Talking about those who destroy the image os islam, is it your self flaggetion that you want to call people to, striking even small babies with knifes, for something he knew nothing about(we can get the pics if you deny)?
is it wailing and beating oneself for no apparent reason you want to call people to?
is it cursing people on mimbar you want to call people to?
is it mutah (temporary marriage) you want to call people to? even though you will not want it for your daughter or your family member?
is it grave worship?
you people call to what is even worse than christianity, judaism put together
please let us know that good thing that shias call to, it is you who put up shows like retards.

now to some of the groups you mentioned, if you are well informed, you will know that the strongest condemnation for al-qaeda comes from sunni scholars (or those you call wahabis), if you deny that they said it we will bring it, we just do not believe in prolonging matters.
One of the strongest critics of Boko Haram is a sunni individual in the person of shaykh gumi.

what this goes to show is that, yes some sunnis might get things wrong, but the sunnis do not cover up what is against the word of Allah, they speak against it openly. the question for you is where are your scholars who condemn the shirk and profanities that you people utter? We posted some videos just for the purpose of showing the people what you shias believe. before somene sits in lagos or whereever and start denying that shias do not believe in this or that. who should we believe your scholars or you?

if this is not shirk then i dont know what is. Shias will never cease to amaze you and some still think we are upon the same religion.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=K6GXrd8BMcc&feature=endscreen

Sunnis are not afraid to praise Ali, Hassan and Husain when it is due and yet they say we hate ahlul bait. They were shocked to hear sunni say this, meaning they do not know their religion (thats why you see them (like lagosshia)saying shia do not say this, they do not say that and yet people more knowledgeable than him are defending those position he calims ignorance of. And of course they do not know what sunnis believe (not surprising)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CCG8hgasNQ

To all the shias on this forum and wherever. You say people falsely accuse you of saying the quran is not complete,
yet in one of the videos posted, your scholars says your hadith that says the quran contains 17,000 verses is authentic,
guess you are more knowledgeable than your scholars or ignorant or as usual playings games.

Your book kafi was quoted as saying all companions except 3 or so became disbelievers after the death of the prophet (saw), yet you still saying people are falsely accusing you. then you go on an on about non-issues, this is why i said in my first posting, these are your scholars saying things that opposes what you profess to believe. why dont you address that.

for clarity sake, what did kafi (i guess they say it is your saheeh bukhari) say about the companions?
what did your scholars say about the quran, does it contain 17,000 verses?

if our assertion is true that they affirm these two assertions, then at least be man enough to accept that you made a mistake in saying that ignorant sunni falsely accuses you and then clarify the issues if you are able.

there is no end to their lies and hatred for the wives of the Messenger

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSKTowfl7FA

Another shia demonstrating his lack of understanding of the quran

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0eI_0e3lwk

and this is one of their scholars about the quran, guess lagosshia is more knowledgeable.
it is not we 'ignorant sunni'that says the quran is not complete, it is your scholars that said it, so you sit down in lagos (if we go by your name because it could also be taqiya) and say it is not your belief while your scholars say it is your belief. so go and study your religion or come to us and we will teach you islam.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NbGpm_PzHI

lagosshia read my quote about khomeini correctly, i said he said the imams are higher in status than the prophet and you said all muslims believe that!!! Muslims dont believe that any muslim is higher in status than the Messenger of Allah.

LagosShia and his cohorts, and all sunnis too should watch the following video. Maybe lagosshia is more knowledgeable than that their alfa. See correct taqiyyah in action. why the fury over something that is part of your deen?
And please always address issues


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTTHfc8hq-g

what happened to quran 33:32 that clarified those that were being addressed in 33:33? you would not quote it because it refers to the wives

Thank you brother Ibrahim. I almost expect them to go violent and they did not disaapoint. the blood of the messenger of allah was spilled in battle with the kuffar, does that make it preferable to pray on such soil?

Jabir prayed on soil/stone, please quote in full and the source

Sunni hadiths about prostrating on earth, did anybody ever dispute about prostrating on earth? do not deflect, the issue is about the soil of karbala not any other soil.

About abrogation, the quran also refers to abrogation, unless you don't believe that part. (and we would not be surprised)

There is a lot of difference between shia and muslims. if anybody tells you it is only in the branches that we differ then the person falls into one of these categories.
1. A Shia practicing taqqiyya (he knows the truth but he pretends - and this is cardinal in their faith)
2. An ignorant Shia who does not know the fundamental of his belief and is thus similar to
3. An ignorant sunni who does not know what shiism is all about.

As for some of their fundamental belief that separate us, let us examine some few and more will come insha Allah.

1.Some of them believe that Ali should have been the prophet but jibril made a mistake
2.Some of them believe that most if not all the companions of the messenger of Allah became disbelievers after his death
3.Some of them believe that the quran that we have is not complete
4.Some of them believe that their imams (human beings not prophet) are infallible, menaing they do not make mistakes
5.Some of them curses the companions especially Abu Bakr, Umar and Aisha when the quran is clear about not having hatred towards those who have preceded us in faith
6.Some of them like khomeini believe that the imams are higher than the prophets, they have supernatural knowledge

if they like they can respond to each of these issues so that it can be clarified and we have limited it to these for now and because these are fundamental issues not secondary issues.

Not so fast. There are several issues to be observed from this write up.
1. if the soil must be pure, was it pure before the killing of Husayn(RA) or is it the killing that purified it more than any other soil?
2. Even in the narration quoted(even though unathenticated) nowhere is it stated that the Prophet (sallalhau alayhi wa salam) prostrated on it. he merely held it so if you want to follow the text, follow it exactly.
3. name the companions who also prostate on karbale stones.
4. when using narrations, state the authenticity form either sunni or shia perspective. so people will know the status of the narrations.
5. it is not sufficient to just quote narration from collectors of narrations, what is the collectors opinion of that narration. for example Abu Dawud comments on some ahadiths in his book by saying it is abrogated, so it will be unjust for someone to quote that narration as a narration from Abu Dawud and not say Abu Dawud position.
6. As an aside when you quote sunni narrations to support sunni positions, there is no point there, but when you quote auhtenticated sunni sources to oppose sunni views, then you have a point. likewise if we sunnis will quote shia sources (since we do not share authentication), it will only be useful if we quote what opposes your beliefs from your imams. which insha Allah abound and we will quote.