₦airaland Forum

seunmsg:
On no account should the case against him be dropped. The case must be prosecuted diligently and justice served at the end of the day.

. Tomorrow early morning,Go to the court and inform them ,stop Disturbing us here

RightChanneI:
honesttalk21

You are no where to be seen and found, so sorry for that. It hit you hardly!

. He is Busy looking for one the Quran verses to support his Comments . Peace means different things when it comes to Islam .. Never seen Loved of Human Blood ,Killing ,Killing and Killing .

honesttalk21:
Echo Akir2025 substantiate your outbursts or at least try to make effort.

The Qur’an doesn’t dismiss the Bible; instead, it acknowledges the Torah and the Gospel as earlier messages from God (Qur’an 3:3, 5:46). This idea of later revelations correcting communities is actually a theme found in the Bible itself. Throughout the Bible, fear often accompanies encounters with angels. For instance, Daniel was so overwhelmed by Gabriel that he collapsed and lost his strength (Daniel 8:17–18; 10:7–9). Zechariah was troubled and fear fell upon him when he saw Gabriel (Luke 1:11–13), and Mary was greatly troubled (Luke 1:29). Gideon was terrified after meeting the angel of the LORD (Judges 6:22–23), and even John fell down in fear before an angel (Revelation 22:8–9). So, fear is actually a sign of divine awe in the Bible, not a sign of demonic intimidation. And the Gabriel mentioned in the Qur’an is the same messenger we recognize from the Bible.

. Quran is Written by Muhammad and his Men .Not dictated By Angel Gabriel, it's Plagiarised from the Bible .Never gave one Prophecy ,Died By Poison. It's a Catastrophic

AntiChristian:
Jesus preached and people wrote it down. Some transmitted it orally! The Qur'an wasn't transmitted by being written down but mainly by memorization!

Waraqah didn't have the book of Genesis, Numbers, Leviticus Deuteronomy and Exodus as Torah! And the Books of Paul were not the Injeel Jesus preached! That's certain!

The Quran ..Written by Men to Discredit the Holy Book of The Bible which have existed Many Years before the Quran .

Angel Gabriel never Intimidated anyone he Visits ...Only Demons does

honesttalk21:
Use your reading aids or what you like and see your mcq has been answered.

. ISLAM ...NOTHING PEACEFUL ABOUT THIS RELIGION..

Expecting comments

Thanks

It's Traditional religion Genocide that we have . Intact those Traditional religion worshippers are Not Nigerians ...What a Statement from Bulaba

How do you invest on Treasury Bills in Nigeria?

Please ,I want to request an Experts or someone that has already Invested on Treasury Bills to Kindly explain how I can Invest on Treasury bills .

Where to go get the Treasury Bills Genuinely

I understand one can starts between 100k to 5 Million and Above .

Assume one buys a TB worth 50 Million Naira ,What would be the likely Gain between 3 month ?

Can TB Crash if the Nigerian Economy isn't Going on fine ?

Can one Loose the Funds invested on TB ?

Bank Goes bankrupt,Can Operators of TB Goes bankrupt and one looses the funds he use to invest ?

Par-Adventure one wish to Discontinue the TB investment and decided to Take his Capital investment back ,How Swift it is or one would be Subjected to a cumbersome Protocols?

Is there any season , Appropriate time TB is Sold ?

Pls.Help

honesttalk21:
The Targum refers to the Aramaic translation and paraphrase of the Hebrew Bible. Unlike the Midrash, which is primarily interpretive commentary, the Targum serves both as a translation and as an explanatory tool, often incorporating interpretive elements directly into the text. Its emergence was largely a response to the linguistic realities following the Babylonian Exile, when Aramaic became the everyday language for many Jews. As a result, the Targum provided accessible scripture and clarification for communities no longer fluent in Hebrew. While avoiding anthropomorphic descriptions of God was one motivation, it was by no means the sole reason for the Targum’s development.

The term memra meaning the word,“agency,” or manifestation of YHWH serves as a theological and linguistic device within the Targum. When the Hebrew text presents the Angel of the LORD, the Targum sometimes substitutes memra to emphasize that this figure represents God’s operative presence. This choice highlights divine agency in the narrative, but it does not suggest a belief in multiple deities. Rather, it is a deliberate translation and theological strategy.

On non-living agents as messengers in the Tanakh, the Hebrew Bible frequently personifies divine attributes, allowing them to function as active agents.

The word of YHWH (Dabar/Memra) described as going forth and accomplishing God’s will (see Isaiah 55:11).
Wisdom (Chokhmah) in Proverbs, where wisdom is personified, speaking and acting as an agent (Proverbs 8 ) .

These are poetic devices, not indications of separate created beings. They allow non-personified aspects of God’s agency to act within the narrative framework.

There is no contradiction between the Shema’s declaration of God’s oneness and the use of memra in the Targum. In fact, the introduction of memra serves to uphold strict monotheism by avoiding literal, corporeal descriptions of God. This approach enables the Targum to convey divine action without attributing physical form to YHWH.

Repetition of Memra is not a statement on divine multiplicity. The frequent appearance of memra in Targumic texts is a matter of grammatical and ideological convention. Repetition of this term does not imply the existence of multiple divine persons; rather, it consistently personifies a single mode of divine action across various contexts.

Use of Memra in Heavenly contexts.
The Targum employs memra in heavenly scenes for the same reason it does elsewhere to avoid language that could suggest God possesses a physical form, even in celestial imagery. This reflects a consistent interpretive policy, not an assertion that memra is a separate deity.

The Angel of the LORD: Theophany or Created Angel?
The identity of the Angel of the LORD varies by context. In some passages, the angel functions as a theophany, speaking as God Himself. In others, particularly in later prophetic texts, the angel is depicted as a distinct being who converses with God. Ancient interpreters recognized these differences and debated their implications; there is no single, uniform interpretation.

Speaking from Between the Cherubim:Divine Presence in the Holy of Holies
Biblical texts describe the space between the cherubim in the Holy of Holies as the locus of God’s manifested presence in what later tradition calls the Shekinah. Classical Jewish interpretation maintains that God remains transcendent and is not physically localized, even as He communicates from this sacred space, whether directly or through intermediaries.

Second-Temple Literature and Exalted Heavenly Figures
Certain Second-Temple texts, such as 1 Enoch and some mystical or rabbinic writings, introduce exalted heavenly figures like Metatron. While these traditions reflect a diversity of thought, they are later or more sectarian developments. Their existence does not imply that the Targums universally endorse belief in a second deity.

Hagar’s Encounter: Seeing God and Angelic Theophany
When Hagar claims to have seen God after encountering the Angel, the narrative presents the angelic appearance as a theophany. The angel’s words and actions manifest God’s knowledge and authority. In such cases, ancient audiences understood the messenger as embodying God’s presence, not as a separate deity.

This one is Just Typing Long Epistle to defend Lies .

honesttalk21:
After failing with Quran 9:5 you run back to Quran 8:9 that was earlier addressed still insisting on translation that isn't in the original text. Evidence within the Qur’an and the actions of the Prophet Muhammad during pivotal moments in Islamic history affirm that Qur’an 8:39 was never intended as a universal call to arms against all non-believers. Instead, it addressed a specific conflict and underscored the importance of ending persecution, not enforcing conversion. Come back when you have clear unwavering concerns. Thank you.

You go Explain tire to defend Lies .The Practical life of your Religion founder doesn't speak or spell anything Peace .

Cherrybae:
King Reno, the slayer of obedient and ipob.

God bless Reno.

Obedient will not sleep today.

Obedient, ipob, you see una life

Had a Sound Sleep ,Not Everyone that Says the Truth about Reno are IPOB ,Stop being Sentimental.

Reno Doesn't Worth Being Made An Ambassador.

But I understand Tinubu must do this to Silence him to Appreciate His Deceitful Stop to Insulting him.

Reno Had Insulted Tinubu More than Enough ,There are Nigerians who never did that that Ought to have been given that Opportunities but I understand some Opposition and critics have to be Silenced with Such Position ..FFK as well.

Naija My County , Where the Sane and Respectful People are Abandoned and the Disrespectful are Celebrated.

Well done Baba Tinubu

Emu4life:
No Christian is subjected to Sharia Law.

You all should stop beating dead horse.

. This One is Typing from the Moin , No Christian is Subjected to Sharia Law , Continue

honesttalk21:
Banu Bakr and Banu Khuza‘ah were not Quraysh tribes but were allies of Quraysh and the Muslims, respectively. These are key participant in the treaty.
When Banu Bakr attacked Khuza‘ah, Quraysh backed them, breaking the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah. That’s why Qur’an 9:5 addresses those treaty-breakers, not all Meccans or non-Muslims. It's obvious you didn't even try to investigate this treaty and are carelessly making statements.

Quran is Words of Muhammad and His Men to Propagate His Founded Religion .He Fought and Fought ,Killed to Propagate it .It's all about War not Peace

honesttalk21:
The whole objection is based on something the Bible never actually states which is that the angel of the lord who appeared to Moses couldn’t possibly be Gabriel. In the Hebrew Bible, “Angel of the LORD” isn’t a personal name; it’s more of a title for God’s messenger acting with divine authority. Scholars from both Christian and Jewish backgrounds, along with academic researchers, all point out that this figure isn’t named anywhere in Exodus. The text simply doesn’t specify who the messenger was.

Since the Torah doesn’t name any angels in the stories of Moses, saying Gabriel never spoke to Moses is really just an argument from silence, not a fact found in the Bible. Later texts, like those in Daniel and Luke, do mention Gabriel, but that doesn’t rule out his earlier missions; it just means that the earlier books don’t name any angels at all. Some Jewish commentary even suggests that Gabriel had additional missions that aren’t explicitly mentioned in the Torah. So, the idea that Gabriel could not be the messenger to Moses isn’t accepted in Judaism, Christianity, or by historians.

Waraqa wasn’t doing a verse-by-verse analysis; he was recognizing the type of encounter. What he meant was that the messenger who came to Muhammad is the same heavenly figure who historically brings revelation from God to His prophets. This aligns perfectly with how biblical revelation operates. God sends His word through His chosen angel, and the prophetic experiences are notably similar across different traditions.

So, the claim that Waraqa got it wrong just doesn’t hold up. The Bible doesn’t contradict him, it doesn’t name the angel, and there’s nothing in scripture or scholarship that makes his recognition impossible. This objection is based on a selective interpretatio not on the actual text.

. Angel Gabriel didn't Appear to Mr.Muhammad .He and His People Formulated the whole thing to defend His Founded Religion

honesttalk21:
The Prophet pbuh was never told to harm his own people. Qur’an 9:5, it specifically addresses certain Meccan groups that broke a peace treaty by attacking the Prophet’s allies. The verses surrounding it make the boundaries clear as those who honored their agreements were safeguarded, anyone who sought peace was welcomed, and those who repented were left unharmed (9:1–4, 9:6). No reputable Muslim or Western historian interprets this as a directive to kill all Quraysh or all non-Muslims, because the historical context simply doesn’t support that interpretation.

The argument that Arabic isn’t Nigeria’s official language, doesn’t really prove anything. Latin isn’t the official language of any European nation, yet it played a crucial role in shaping European law, education, and scholarship for a thousand years. Civilizational influence comes from ideas and institutions, not from forcing everyone to speak a particular language. The way Islam influenced West Africa was similar: Ajami literacy (in Hausa, Kanuri, Fulfulde), governance systems, law, scholarship, trade, and widespread education (makarantun allo) all thrived long before Europeans showed up. And if language alone dictated influence, then how do we explain that English which isn’t tied to any of Nigeria’s ethnic groups became our national language and dominates our courts, schools, and politics? Influence doesn’t require a complete linguistic takeover.

You ask me to you a link and disregard that serious research isn’t done through quick TikTok-style snippets. Academic work is found in books and peer-reviewed journals. However, you can easily access major sources like UNESCO’s General History of Africa (Volumes III & IV), the African Ajami Library, The Kano Chronicle, and the Timbuktu Manuscripts Project all of which are open access and maintained by historians from Nigeria, Africa, America, and Europe. Clearly address with opposing research findings not knee jerk like outbursts.

These scholars aren’t coordinating Islamic propaganda. When Muslim sources, Western historians, and Nigerian academics all agree on the same facts, dismissing it as taqiyya isn’t critical thinking; it’s simply rejecting well-documented history because it challenges a preconceived narrative and does you no good.

Islam Breeds Terrorism the Standard and Legacy of the Founder that was Killed By Poison

honesttalk21:
The context of Qur’an 9:5 isn’t just a matter of speculation; it’s one of the most well-documented events in the life of the Prophet, recognized by both Muslim and Western scholars alike. Following the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah in 628 CE, tribes allied with Quraysh launched a night raid on the Muslim-aligned Banu Khuza‘ah, resulting in several deaths and a clear breach of the peace agreement. Quraysh backed these attackers. This incident is detailed in works like Ibn Hisham’s Sirah, al-Tabari, and Ibn Kathir, and it’s also mentioned in Sahih al-Bukhari. Notable Western historians such as Fred Donner, W. Montgomery Watt, and Patricia Crone have also examined it. Qur’an 9:5 was revealed after a four-month warning specifically aimed at these treaty violators, rather than being a blanket directive against all non-Muslims. This understanding is widely accepted in mainstream scholarship. Perharps you want to show and most unlikely prove otherwise?

The same goes for the Crusade. My claims are based on credible sources, not obscure websites. We have firsthand Christian accounts like those of Fulcher of Chartres and the Gesta Francorum, along with significant academic contributions from Steven Runciman, Thomas Asbridge, Jonathan Riley-Smith, and Christopher Tyerman published by reputable institutions like Cambridge, Yale, and Oxford. If citing well-respected historians is dismissed as taqiyya, then that term has truly lost its meaning particularly to you who often misquotes and use it. What you should do is show these authors and their writings say otherwise.

When it comes to Islam’s influence on Nigeria, the historical evidence is just as compelling. Islam brought Ajami literacy (Hausa, Kanuri, Fulfulde written in Arabic script), which facilitated administration, medicine, poetry, law, and record-keeping long before Europeans established schools. Scholars like Murray Last, John Hunwick, and Beverly Mack, along with Nigerian historians, have documented this in detail. Islam played a crucial role in shaping the governance of Kanem-Bornu, the Hausa states, and the Sokoto Caliphate; it expanded trans-Saharan trade routes linking the region to North Africa and beyond; and it laid the groundwork for the earliest widespread education system (makarantun allo). These contributions are significant for Nigeria as a whole, not just for the Muslim community.

Save your Energy.Nothing is Peaceful about Islam.

AntiChristian:
Who did they kill among your relatives?

Islam is a Religion War .If the ones they Killed Among Your Relatives doesn't Pains You ,It's not Everyone that is Heartless that waits before they kill someone among His relatives before He Voices Out .. Deborah and that Teacher Beheaded are Human Beings and Nigerian

honesttalk21:
Just as was displayed with Quran 8:39, the verse Qur’an 9:5 is misquoted and misunderstood and taken out of context. It was also revealed during a specific historical and military situation, aimed at armed pagans who had repeatedly broken treaties and attacked Muslims. It doesn’t give anyone the green light to kill civilians or force conversions. In fact, the same verse mentions that if they repent, pray, and pay zakat, they should be left alone. This clearly shows that the goal was to end persecution and promote peace, rather than spreading Islam through violence. Muhammad Mahmoud Ghali, highlights that this verse pertains to defensive warfare, not unprovoked aggression.

When it comes to the Crusades, there’s a wealth of verifiable sources. For instance, Pope Urban II’s speech at Clermont in 1095 is well-documented in medieval chronicles, including those by Fulcher of Chartres.

Historians like Steven Runciman and Jonathan Riley-Smith have thoroughly recorded these campaigns as wars sanctioned by religion, targeting Muslims, Jews, and heretical Christians, rather than being mere secular conflicts.

As for Nigeria, the impact of Islam is both well-documented and evident:

The introduction of Ajami script allowed local languages to be written using Arabic letters.

There’s been a significant spread of Qur’anic education and literacy.

Trans-Saharan trade networks were established, connecting West Africa to the wider Muslim world.

Zakat was implemented, leading to the creation of early organized social welfare systems.

Legal and ethical scholarship developed, which helped shape governance and jurisprudence in Hausa–Kanuri societies.

These contributions are historical realities, not glorification. Understanding context, history, and scholarship is far more important than relying on selective quotes or obscure links.

Links break because websites get redesigned, pages are moved or deleted, academic sites lock content behind paywalls, and URL systems change over time. A broken link does not mean the history is false it just means the website structure changed. You were unable to visit the last 2 links but say nothing on the first I believe you accessed.

Islam is Religion of War .

honesttalk21:
Where?

The Qur’an does NOT command fighting until Islam is the only religion.


The Crusades were openly religious wars even admitted by Christian historians.

Steven Runciman – A History of the Crusades

Jonathan Riley-Smith – The Crusades: A History

Pope Urban II’s speech (Council of Clermont, 1095) recorded in medieval Christian chronicles like Fulcher of Chartres

And Islam did bring education, law, trade, and literacy to parts of Nigeria long before colonialism.

The advent of Islam had a profound impact on the development of education in the region that is now Nigeria, primarily through the introduction of Islamic scholarship and the establishment of Quranic schools. These schools, often attached to mosques, became centers for learning, focusing on the memorization of the Quran, Arabic language, Islamic law, theology, and sometimes mathematics and astronomy.

https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1382/the-spread-of-islam-in-ancient-africa/

https://www.britannica.com/place/West-Africa/Islam#ref235677

https://www.oxfordislamicstudies.com/article/opr/t125/e0066

Why was your Muhammad Attacking traders then take there Goods .

honesttalk21:
Is this the best you can do?

Islam is not Religion of Peace .

The World without Taqquiya,Jihad , Terrorism would have been better .

Image123:
Some people go still complain, na their destiny.
Wetin gen Z and co know about ECOMOG that year.
Nigeria remains part of a regional standby / rapid-deployment force under ECOWAS, and troops may be mobilized abroad when needed. It's ECOWAS standby force.
There's an existing Mutual Defence and Constitutional Order Protocol — establishing a 5,000-person rapid-intervention force headquartered in Abuja.

Nigeria remains a key member of that security architecture. But wailers go wail tire, including content creators and ignorant TV people.

Some people don't understand the simple math, your street and neighborhood can't be burning and you sleep or have a party. The problems around us, put pressure on us. If you are rich in the middle of poor relatives, you are poor. Of course, wailers can't relate or understand. They are not destined to.

U are the Wailer here .

Think before you type ..Life is Being Wasted on daily basis in Nigeria , The Swift response should be Made towards Terrorism

honesttalk21:
Terrorism is a distortion of humanity, not a unique character of Islam. The Qur’an clearly states in 5:32 and 6:151 that killing innocents is forbidden. The Prophet (pbuh) never instructed anyone to attack civilians; jihad is about struggle, not violence.
Imagine a world free from terrorism, but also devoid of colonialism, Nazi ideology, militant cults, or oppressive regimes.
Violence isn’t exclusive to Islam; people twist every ideology to justify their actions.
If you assert that Islam promotes terror, show me a Qur’anic verse that supports that claim now or acknowledge that you can’t.

Islam,Islam ,Islam

Imagine a World without Islam ,A World Without Terrorism,A World Without Jihad ,A world without Taqquiya. A World Without Sharia...Ohhh !!! How Awesome it would have been .

honesttalk21:
Extremists aren’t truly practicing Islam; they’re actually going against it. Their actions have nothing to do with the Qur’an or the teachings of Prophet Muhammad pbuh. Instead, they stem from political manipulation, ignorance, and a complete disregard for the law. The Prophet never allowed for mob killings, never supported taking laws into your own hands nor forcefully enforcing, and certainly never taught his followers to impose belief through chaos.

In Islamic law, punishment is meant to be administered by recognized courts following due process, not by crowds, militias, or self-appointed vigilantes. Terrorist groups and mobs don’t embody the teachings of Islam; they completely contradict them.

History shows us that ruling elites have often twisted religion to justify their power. This has occurred in Christianity during the Crusades, within various Muslim empires, and across other traditions as well. The Crusades were a series of religious wars from 1095 to 1291, initiated and sanctioned by the Catholic Church to reclaim the Holy Land from Muslim control. Crusaders, promised spiritual rewards, targeted Muslims, Jews, and even other Christians, often committing massacres and forced conversions. They were explicitly religiously motivated, with military campaigns justified by Papal decrees and framed as a holy duty. There is no historical record of a Muslim leader sanctioning unrestricted violence against civilians or authorizing mobs to enforce religion the way the Crusades were organized.

The misuse of faith by violent individuals is a reality but that misuse doesn’t define the doctrine.

The distinction is clear. Islam prohibits anarchy and murder, while extremists thrive in that chaos. If violence were truly a part of Islam’s teachings, mobs wouldn’t be condemned by Islamic legal schools but they are.

Let’s place the blame where it belongs; on criminality, on lawlessness, and on political exploitation. Don’t mislabel the religion.

Oga ...Relax ..Islam is not Religion of Peace ..Fave the Truth ...

honesttalk21:
You're mixing up religious abuse with the idea of religious permission. Extremists aren't driven to violence by Islam itself; rather, they emerge in lawless regions where power-hungry leaders twist faith to their advantage. If Islam were the root of terrorism, then all 1.8 billion Muslims around the globe would be violent but that's simply not the case.

Christianity has its own dark chapters, like the Crusades, Inquisitions, and colonial genocides carried out in God's name, yet nobody equates Christianity with violence. The same reasoning applies to Islam.

The Qur’an 5:32 clearly states that taking one life is akin to taking all of humanity extremists overlook this because they thrive on chaos, not on the teachings of their faith.

If doctrine were the sole cause of terror, we'd see it everywhere but terror is selective. This points to the real issues at play; politics, ignorance, and the thirst for power, rather than Islam itself.

Social media outrage is not legal judgment. Justice happens in courts, not comment sections or market place noise.

Islam Islam Islam ,Imagine a World without it .

Imagine a World without Jihad , Terrorism,

Does Funds in Account Frozen or Closed By the Commercial Bank Moved to the CBN or Still kept with The Commercial Bank ?

honesttalk21:
The usual error of faulty generalisations.
Very hasty generalization fallacy that takes crimes by individuals and makes them Islamic doctrine. Islam does not allow vigilante killings; only courts under due process can judge crimes. Which court or governing body judged and declared these actions? Taqiyya is a minority survival concept, not a global Muslim strategy. Extremists like Boko Haram are rejected by mainstream Islamic scholarship. Confusing criminal behavior with religious teaching is dishonest reasoning, not serious debate.

You are unable to call your government governing bodies to do their work appropriately so you hide behind lazy lies.

Only Court Under Due Process Can Judge Crimes ....Hymmm !

So a Teacher Beheaded because He Tried Preventing a Muslim from Bringing in Quran into the Exam Hall ,Witnessed Physically by People in Broad day light is not a Crime ...it is Justice ...Such had to wait for a Judge to Say oh ! It's a crime ...What a Funny and Heartless Comment is this ?

A Lady Burnt to Death and even the Muslim that did that was so full of Joy and Confidence of what has done in Fulfilment of whatever he has Read from the Quran ,Even Displaying the Matches,I burnt her .

Needs a Judge somewhere to Pronounce , this is a Crime .

And so Many More .

Even Group of Muslim Lawyers had to Gather themselves to Defend that Guy ,Defend what ,What Basis will they Use..The Sharia ,Right is that a Nigerian Law or an Islamic Law in a Secular Country .

What has Deborah done that is wrong ?

What has that Teacher done Wrong .

But Why can't we just say the Naked Truth for Almighty God sake.
.Nothing is Being Generalise here ..It's an Objective Analysis..

advanceDNA:
As usual...u have come to play the same script of hiding under media........

if you will answer truthfully ......The class mates of Deborah who was set her ablaze for saying blood of Jesus cover her on a class group chat, are they not everyday Muslims she goes to class with at the higher institution?? Is it media that set her ablaze??

Again I ask you.....The teacher that was set beheaded for seizing the Quran a student wanted to take to the exam hall back in 2012, are they not everyday Muslims students she sees and teaches in the school??

Please explain....How is it peaceful that u muslims get to a location and suddenly want to cancel and suppress other pple's liberty and laws with your own shariah?? The same liberty that allowed you to grow freely and practice your islam?

Go and take a look at your extremism all over Europe....u keep giving media as an excuse, but you know u muslim always get to pples country and start agitating for laws against your host's laws and culture.....how is that peaceful??

Poland had to make a law that they won't allow Muslims immigrants into their country because they now realize u pple take advantage of friendly immigration laws to enter pples land only to turn round and wanting to subdue your host with laws antagonistic to their land..

The truth is that, ...u Muslims never show ur true colors when you are not majority or haven't increased significantly in an area which is the situation in the south...and it is called Taqiyya
.... But Once u become majority or have significant numbers, u are never peaceful to others that are not Muslims.......ur religion doesn't remain a personal thing anymore ...u start looking for how to cancel pple's law and culture to replace it with shariah... How is this peaceful??

When your fellow Muslims brother start doing their Islamic extremism , u call them criminals, but the truth is these violence and killings are permitted in Islamic states......and you all know it is permitted...

Lesser jihad which Bokoharam is doing is an Islamic practice...
Killing who leaves islam is allowed in islam..
Killing for wateva reason u tag as blasphemy is allowed in islam

.... But the issue is many of u want to practice these extreme practice anyway weda u are in Afghanistan or UK..u don't see it as extreme marrying a nine year old or killing someone who rejects Islam because even though ur Islam says no compulsion, you still consider the person a kufir and therefore qualified to be killed as a service you your God....

Hmmm ! It's well...This is Food for thought.Any Contrary View ?